Chapter published in:
Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions: Categories, co-text, and context
Edited by Pascal Hohaus and Rainer Schulze
[Studies in Language Companion Series 216] 2020
► pp. 109140

References

Aijmer, Karin
1980Evidence and the Declarative Sentence. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
2009 Seem and evidentiality. Functions of Language 16(1): 63–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2003Evidentiality in typological perspective. In Studies in Evidentiality [Typological Studies in Language 54], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 1–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B.
1986Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 273–312. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Austin, John L.
1962Sense and Sensibilia, reconstructed by Geoffrey J. Warnock from the manuscript notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Barron, Julia
1997LFG and the history of raising verbs. In Proceedings of the LFG97 Conference University of California, San Diego, Miriam Butt & Trancy Holloway King (eds). Stanford CA: CSLI. http://​www​-csli​.stanford​.edu​/publications (25 May 2019).Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1972The syntax of parecer . In Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics to the Memory of Pierre Delattre, Albert Valdman (ed.), 65–76. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper
2010aEvidence for what? Evidence and scope. STUF. Zeitschrift für Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 63(4): 290–307.Google Scholar
2010bRaising verbs and auxiliaries in a functional theory of grammatical status. In Language Usage and Language Structure, Kasper Boye & Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen (eds), 73–104. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Epistemic Meaning. A Crosslinguistic and Functional-Cognitive Study. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016The expression of epistemic modality. In The Oxford Handbook of Mood and Modality, Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 117–140. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2018Evidentiality: The notion and the term. In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), 261–272. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter
2012A usage-based theory of grammatical status. Language 88(1): 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen
1978Universals of language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Questions and Politeness Strategies in Social Interaction, Esther Goody (ed.), 56–311. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1985Morphology. A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
1999On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics 31(7): 881–909. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1986Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 261–272. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Clemen, Gudrun
1997The concept of hedging. Origins, approaches and definitions. In Hedging and Discourse. Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts, Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schröder (eds), 235–248. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clemen, Wolfgang
1959Schein und Sein bei Shakespeare. München: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Col, Gilles & Poibeau, Thierry
2014An instruction-based analysis of over . Language and Cognition 6(3): 370–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dance, Richard
2018The horns of a dilemma: Finding the Viking influence on Medieval English vocabulary. In Textual Reception and Cultural Debate in Medieval English Studies, María José Esteves Ramos & José Ramón Prado-Pérez (eds), 101–128. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark
Word frequency list from 450-million words version of the Corpus of Contemporary American English. https://​www​.wordfrequency​.info​/free​.asp​?s​=y (28 May 2019).
Dedenbach-Salazar Sáenz, Sabine
1997La descripción gramatical como reflejo e influencia de la realidad lingüística: La presentación de las relaciones hablante-enunciado e intra-textuales en tres gramáticas quechuas coloniales y ejemplos de su uso en el discurso quechua de la época. In La descriptión de las lenguas amerindias en la epoca colonial, Klaus Zimmermann (ed.), 291–320. Frankfurt: Vervuert.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2000 Scheinen als Faktizitätsmarker. In Wortschatz und Orthographie in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Festschrift für Horst Haider Munske zum 65. Geburtstag am 5. Mai 2000, Mechthild Habermann, Peter O. Müller & Bernd Naumann (eds), 333–355. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2006Hecken und Heckenausdrücke. Versuch einer Neudefinition. In Italienisch und Deutsch als Wissenschaftssprachen. Bestandsaufnahmen, Analysen, Perspektiven, Emilia Calaresu, Christina Guardiano & Klaus Hölker (eds), 294–315. Berlin: Lit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, Kresic, Marijana & Smirnova, Elena
2009The grammaticalization channels of evidentials and modal particles in German: Integration in textual structures as a common feature. In Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics, Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds), 189–208. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
& Smirnova, Elena 2010Evidentiality in German. Linguistic Realization and Regularities in Grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele & Stathi, Katarina
2019Two distinct sources–one target. A diachronic contrastive study of the grammaticalization of German scheinen and English seem . Functions of Language 26(2): 177–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar, Levshina, Natalia & Klavan, Jane
2016Cognitive linguistics. Looking back, looking forward. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4): 447–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, Terry
1986William Shakespeare. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvan
2009How Words Mean: Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models, and Meaning Construction. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faller, Martina
2002Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Fiehler, Reinhard
1990Kommunikation, Information und Sprache. Alltagsweltliche und wissenschaftliche Konzeptualisierungen und der Kampf um die Begriffe. In Information ohne Kommunikation. Die Loslösung der Sprache vom Sprecher, Rüdiger Weingarten (ed.), 99–128. Frankfurt: Fischer.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
2010Pragmatic competence. In New Approaches to Hedging, Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Stefan Schneider (eds), 15–34. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Viktor
2018Where do evidentials come from? In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), 124–147. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
2015Sense individuation. In The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, Nick Riemer (ed.), 233–247. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gisborne, Nicolas & Holmes, Jasper
2007A history of English verbs of appearance. English Language and Linguistics 11(1): 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givòn, Talmy
1982Evidentiality and epistemic space. Studies in Language 6(1): 23–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul
1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T.
2015Polysemy. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar S. Divjak (eds), 472–490. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
201915 years of collostructions: Some long overdue additions/corrections (to/of actually all sorts of corpus-linguistics measures). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24(3): 385–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand
2007Raising as grammaticalization: The case of Germanic seem-verbs. Rivista di Linguistica 19(1): 129–150.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn revised by Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Webster, John K.
2014Text Linguistics. The How and Why of Meaning. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Harris, Randy Allen
1993The Linguistics Wars. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S.
1970Papers in Structural and Transformational Linguistics. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2015Framework-free grammatical theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, 2nd edn, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 287–310. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hennemann, Anja
2013A Context-sensitive and Functional Approach to Evidentiality in Spanish or Why Evidentiality Needs a Superordinate Category. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herrtage, Sidney J. H.
(ed.) 1882Catholicon Anglicum, an English-Latin Wordbook, dated 1483 (Camden Society, n.s. 30). Oxford: Hall & Stacy.Google Scholar
Hübler, Axel
1983Understatement and Hedges in English [Pragmatics & Beyond, IV:6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1998Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izvorsky, Roumyana
1997The present perfect as an epistemic modal. In Proceedings of Salt VII, Aaron Lawson (ed.), 222–239. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobsen Jr., William H.
1986The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 3–28. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1971/1957Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian Verb. In Roman Jakobson, Selected Writings, II: Word and Language, 130–147. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, Theo A. J. M.
2003Monosemy versus polysemy. In Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics, Hubert Cuyckens, René Dirven & John R. Taylor (eds), 93–122. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Stig
2007/2001The English verb seem and its correspondences in Norwegian: What seems to be the problem? In Seeing through Multilingual Corpora. On the Use of Corpora in Contrastive Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 26], 117–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark
1987The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Samuel
1755A Dictionary of the English Language, Vol. 2. London: Strahan.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Mihatsch, Wiltrud & Schneider, Stefan
(eds) 2010New Approaches to Hedging. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2011On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 852–897. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Koppenfels, Werner
2000Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. In Shakespeare-Handbuch, 4th edn, Ina Schabert (ed.), 533–544. Stuttgart: Kröner.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1972Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 183–228. Reprinted in Journal of Philosophical Logic 4(2): 458–508.Google Scholar
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1999Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lampert, Günther
2011 Seem: Evidential, epistemic, or what else? International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 2(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
2015Sense activation triggering in English epistentials: Attention distribution, contextual modulation of meaning, and categorization issues. Cognitive Semantics 1(1): 77–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Between composition and emergentness: A cognitive re-reading of the Way-construction. Cognitive Semantics 2(2): 164–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Seem- and appear-constructions: Their history and present state. Berlin: Lang.
Lampert, Günther & Lampert, Martina
2010Where does evidentiality reside? Notes on (alleged) limiting cases: Seem and be like . STUF 63(4): 308–321.Google Scholar
Lampert, Martina
2011Attentional profiles of parenthetical constructions: Some thoughts on a cognitive-semantic analysis of written language. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 2(1): 81–106.Google Scholar
Lampert, Martina & Lampert, Günther
2013… the ball seemed to keep rolling … Linking up Cognitive Systems in Language: Attention and Force Dynamics. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1995Raising and transparency. Language 71(1): 1–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lancashire, Ian
2018Introduction to Lexicons of Early Modern English . https://​leme​.library​.utoronto​.ca​/help​/intro (1 June 2019).
Lewis, Robert E.
2002The Middle English dictionary at 71. Dictionaries. Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America 23: 76–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics, 2 Vols. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory & Gilbert, Kristin Enola
2015Multimodal Conduct in the Law. Language, Gesture, and Materiality in Legal Interaction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
MED Middle English Dictionary, Hans Kurath, Sherman M. Kuhn & Robert E. Lewis (eds) Ann Arbor MI University of Michigan Press 1956 2001 http://​quod​.lib​.umich​.edu​/m​/med/ 3 June 2020
Medin, Douglas L. & Ross, Brian H.
1996Cognitive Psychology, 2nd edn. Fort Worth TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
Medin, Douglas & Ortony, Andrew
1989Psychological essentialism. In Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, Steven Vosniadou & Andrew Ortony (eds), 179–195. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Paul Georg
1997Hedging strategies in written academic discourse. Strengthening the argument by weakening the claim. In Hedging and discourse. Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts, Raija Markkanen & Hertmut Schröder (eds), 21–41. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1986Evidential diachrony in Northern Iroquoian. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 89–112. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Momma, Haruko
2013From Philology to English Studies. Language and Culture in the 19th Century. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang G.
2006Einleitung. In William Shakespeare. Hamlet. Englisch-deutsche Studienausgabe, 15–74. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Murphy, Gregory L.
2011Review of Evans (2009). Language 87(2): 393–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
New English Dictionary on Historical Principles
Newman, John
1981The Semantics of Raising Constructions. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Nuyts, Jan
2017Evidentiality reconsidered. In Evidentiality Revisited. Cognitive Grammar, Functional and Discourse-oriented Perspectives, [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271], Juana Isabel Marín Arrese, Gerda Haßler & Marta Carretero (eds), 57–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Susan
1981Problems of seem/scheinen Constructions and their Implications for the Theory of Predicate Sentential Complementation. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
www​.oed​.com (26 May 2019).
Palmer, Frank Robert
2001Mood and Modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Stephen E.
1999Vision Science. From Photons to Phenomenology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pokorny, Julius
1959Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul
2009Modality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F., Frader, R. Joel & Bosk, Charles
1982On hedging in physician-physician discourse. In Linguistics and the Professions, Proceedings of the Second Annual Delaware Symposium on Language Structure, Robert J. di Prieto (ed.), 83–97. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johan
2001aEvidentiality. Part I. Glot International 5(4): 125–133.Google Scholar
2001bEvidentiality. Part II. Glot International 5(5): 161–168.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edgar
1921Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren. Studien in psychologischer Analyse. Kopenhagen: Gyldendalse Bokhandel.Google Scholar
Ruhl, Charles
1989On Monosemy. A Study in Linguistic Semantics. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Joseph Nicol
1755A new universal etymological English dictionary: … Originally compiled by N. Bailey. … And now re-published with many corrections,.. . by different hands. The etymology of all terms.. . being revised and corrected by Joseph Nicol Scott, … Vol. Pages 1 to 557. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Chicago IL: Gale.Google Scholar
Schröter, Juliane
2018Genau oder ungenau? ‘Hedges’ in der Kommunikation der Geisteswissenschaften mit nicht-wissenschaftlichen Publika. In Geisteswissenschaften und Öffentlichkeit. Linguistisch betrachtet, Martin Luginbühl & Juliane Schröter (eds), 169–196. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Seppänen, Aimo
1987On the syntax of seem and appear . Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 40: 336–351.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William
2006Hamlet [Arden Shakespeare, 3rd series], Ann Thompson & Neil Taylor (eds). London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Silva, Penny
2000Time and meaning. Sense and definition in the OED . In Lexicography and the OED. Pioneers in the Untrodden Forest, Lynda Mugglestone (ed.), 77–95. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2005, Johnson and the OED . International Journal of Lexicography 18(1): 231–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, Chris & Kuteva, Tania
1995Distributed spatial semantics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 18: 167–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skeat, Walter W.
1882An Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Theodore
1938Hamlet and the nature of reality. ELH. A Journal of English Literary History 5(4): 253–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario
2018Extragrammatical expression of information source. In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), 273–285. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Stein, Gabriele
2004The Catholicon Anglicum (1483): A Reconsideration. Nordic Journal of English Studies 3(1): 109–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical form. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Usonienė, Aurelia
2000On the modality of the English verbs of seeming. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 14: 185–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Usonienė, Aurelia & Šinkūnienė, Jolanta
2013A cross-linguistic look at the multifunctionality of the English verb seem . In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana Isabel Marín Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arus Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 281–316. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varttala, Teppo
2001Hedging in Scientifically-Oriented Discourse. Exploring Variation According to Discipline and Intended Audience [Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis 138]. PhD dissertation, University of Tampere.
Volkmann, Gesina
2005Weltsicht und Sprache. Epistemische Relativierung am Beispiel des Spanischen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
White, Peter R. R.
2000Dialogue and inter-subjectivity: Reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging. In Dialogue Analysis VII. Working with Dialogue, Malcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill, & Frances Rock (eds), 67–80. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitt, Richard J.
2015On the grammaticalization of inferential evidential meaning: English seem and German scheinen . Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 20(2): 233–271.Google Scholar
2018Evidentiality and propositional scope in Early Modern German. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19(1): 122–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn
2008Lexikalische Markierungen evidenzieller Funktionen: Zur Theoriebildung und empirischen Erforschung im Slavischen. In Lexikalische Evidenzialitätsmarker im Slavischen [Wiener Slawistischer Almanach. Sonderband 72], Björn Wiemer & Vladimir A. Plungian (eds), 5–49. München: Sagner.Google Scholar
2010Evidenzialität aus kognitiver Sicht. In Die slavischen Sprachen im Licht der kognitiven Linguistik / Славянские языки в когнитивном аспекте, Tanja Anstatt & Boris Norman (eds), 117–139. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2018aEvidentials and epistemic modality. In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, Alexandra Aikhenvald (ed.), 85–108. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar
2018bCatching the Elusive. Lexical evidentiality markers in Slavic languages (A questionnaire study and its background). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn & Kampf, Veronika
2011On conditions instantiating tip effects of epistemic and evidential meanings in Bulgarian. Slověne 2: 5–38.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Robert
1971 It seems . Linguistic Inquiry 2(4): 558–559.Google Scholar
Willet, Thomas
1988A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1): 51–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar