References (101)
Aijmer, Karin
1997 I think – An English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen-Westvik (eds.), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karen
2002English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arroyo, José Luis Blas
2011From politeness to discourse marking: The process of pragmaticalization of muy bien in vernacular Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 855–874. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate
2016 Alors/donc/then at the right periphery: Seeking confirmation of an inference. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17(2): 208–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beijering, Karin
2012Expressions of Epistemic Modality in Mainland Scandinavian: A Study into the Lexicalization-grammaticalization-pragmaticalization Interface. PhD dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter
2007Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31(3): 569–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010From performative to concessive disjunct: I/you admit and admittedly . In Language Change and Variation from Old English to Late Modern English: A Festschrift for Minoji Akimoto [Studies in Language and Communication 14], 279–302. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2017The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2005Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia
2013The evolution of three pragmatic markers: As it were, so to speak/say and if you like . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14(2): 161–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia & Arnovick, Leslie
2010Pragmaticalisation and discursisation. In Historical Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics 8], Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 165–192. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Claudi, Ulrike & Heine, Bernd
1986On the metaphorical base of grammar. Studies in Language 10(2): 297–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craig, Colette G.
1991Ways to go in Rama: A case study in polygrammaticalization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 455–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, De Wolf, Simon & Van linden, An
Degand, Liesbeth & Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline
Degand, Liesbeth & Fagard, Benjamin
2011 Alors between discourse and grammar: The role of syntactic position. Functions of Language 18(1): 29–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Simon-Vandenbergen
2011Introduction: Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification of discourse markers. Linguistics 49(2): 287–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole
2014Parentheticals in Spoken English: The Syntax-Prosody Relation [Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dér, Csilla Ilona
2010On the status of discourse markers. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57(1): 3–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dér, Csilla Ilona & Markó, Alexandra
2010A pilot study of Hungarian discourse markers. Language and Speech 53(2): 135–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich & Beeching, Kate
2014Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery : Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2011aGrammaticalization and pragmaticalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 450–461. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2011bPragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49(2): 365–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dostie, Gaetane
2004Pragmaticalisation et marqueurs discursifs: Analyse sémantique et traitement lexicographique. Brussels: De Boeck & Larcier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dostie, Gaétane
2009Discourse markers and regional variation in French: A lexico-semantic approach. In Sociolinguistic Variation in Contemporary French [Impact: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 26], Kate Beeching, Nigel Armstrong & Francoise Gadet (eds), 201–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, Britt & Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt
1993Pragmaticalization: The case of ba and you know . Studier i Modern Sprakvetenskap 10: 76–92.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga
2007aMorphosyntactic Change. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2007bThe development of English parentheticals: A case of grammaticalization? In Tracing English through Time: Explorations in Language Variation: A Festschrift for Herbert Schendl on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday, Ute Smit et al. (eds), 103–118. Vienna: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Frank-Job, Barbara
2006A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 359–374. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1996Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6 (2), 167–190.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999What are discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Topic orientation markers. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 892–898. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furkó, Bálint Péter
2014Cooptation over grammaticalization. Argumentum 10: 289–300.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard
1982Palimpsestes: La littérature au second degré. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
1999Entwickelt sich der Konzessivkonnektor obwohl zum Diskursmarker? Grammatikalisierungstendenzen im gesprochenen Deutsch. Linguistische Berichte 180: 409–446.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
1997 Alors and donc in spoken French: A reanalysis. Journal of Pragmatics 28: 153–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998The semantic status of discourse markers. Lingua 104(3–4): 235–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Particles at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2011Discourse marker and modal particle: The functions of utterance final then in spoken English. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14): 3603–3623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016A processual view on grammar: Macrogrammar and the final field in spoken syntax. Language Sciences 54: 77–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1992Grammaticalization chains. Studies in Language 16(2): 335–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002On the role of context in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205–1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Language contact and extra-clausal constituents: The case of discourse markers. In Kaltenböck, Keizer & Lohmann (eds), 243–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Are there two different ways of approaching grammaticalization? In New Trends on Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 202], Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban & José Vicente Lozano (eds), 23–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
1991Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Kuteva, Tania
2016On insubordination and cooptation. In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language 115], Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds), 39–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping
2013An outline of discourse grammar. In Functional Approaches to Language, Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds), 175–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Cooptation as a discourse strategy. Linguistics 55: 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction [Studies in the Development of Language 9]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechthild
1984Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Functional Discourse Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 367–400. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word-formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward strengthening hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics 26(1): 23–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In: Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Volume 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003Grammaticalization (2nd rev. edn). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Ziv, Yael
1998Discourse markers: Introduction. In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2007Spoken parenthetical clauses in English. In Parentheticals. [Liguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 25–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2011On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 848–893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Heine, Bernd, Hong, Bo, Long, Haiping, Narrog, Heiko & Rhee, Seongha
2019World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, 2nd extensively revised and updated edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
2011Grammaticalization and Cognitive Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 79–91. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
[1982] 2015Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd edn [Classics in Linguistics 1]. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Lenker, Ursula
2000 Soþlice and witodlice: Discourse markers in Old English. In Pathways of Change. Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 229–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2006Deixis. In: Laurence R. Horn & Gregory L. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. London: Blackwell, 87–120.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael
2009Metalanguage in Interaction: Hebrew Discourse Markers [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 181]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matasović, Rolf
2008Patterns of grammaticalization and the layered structure of the clause. In New applications of Role and Reference Grammar: Diachrony, Grammaticalization, Romance Languages, Rolf Kailuweit, Björn Wiemer, Eva Staudinger & Rolf Matasović (eds), 45–57. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2009Degrammaticalization. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ocampo, Francisco
2006Movement towards discourse is not grammaticalization: The development of /claro/ from adjective to discourse particle in spoken Spanish. In Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Nura Sagarra & Almeida Jacqueline Toribio (eds), 308–319. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko Okada
2011The grammaticalization of discourse markers. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 611–620. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Prévost, Sophie
2011 A propos from verbal complement to discourse marker: A case of grammaticalization? Linguistics 49(2): 391–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rhee, Seongha
2018Grammaticalization of the plural marker in Korean: From object to text to stance. Journal of Language Sciences 25(4): 221–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rysová, Magdaléna
2017Discourse connectives: From historical origin to presentday development. In New Perspectives on Cohesion and Coherence, Katrin Menzel, Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski & Kerstin Kunz (eds), 11–35. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 5]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Stefan
2007Reduced Parenthetical Clauses as Mitigators: A Corpus Study of Spoken French, Italian and Spanish [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 27]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Stefan, Glikman, Julie & Mathieu Avanzi
(eds) 2015Parenthetical Verbs. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence Clifford
1999Discourse markers. Lingua 107: 227–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2018From the inside to the outside of the sentence: Forming a larger discourse unit with jijitsu ‘fact’. In New Trends on Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 202], Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban & José Vicente Lozano (eds), 333–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabor, Whitney & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1998Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37], Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 229–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony
1991A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Eliabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1982From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Directions for Historical Linguistics, [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 24], Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1): 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the International Conference of Historical Linguistics XII, Manchester 1995.
2015Investigating “periphery” from a functionalist perspective. Linguistics Vanguard 1(1): 119–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Modeling language change with constructional networks. In Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change [Studies in Pragmatics 18], Salvador Pons Bordería & Óscar Loureda Lamas (eds), 17–50. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B.
2002Regularity in Semantic Change [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 96]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urmson, James Opie
1952Parenthetical verbs. Mind (New Series) 61(244): 480–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Bogaert, Julie
2011 I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics 49(2): 295–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard
2002Imperatives, interruption in conversation and the rise of discourse markers: A study of Italian guarda . Linguistics 40: 987–1010. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006The rise of discourse markers in Italian: A specific type of language change. In Approaches to Discourse Markers [Studies in Pragmatics 1], Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 61–76. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike
2011 So as an emerging focus marker in German. Linguistics 49(5): 991–1039. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse
2000Grammaticalization versus lexicalization: ‘Methinks’ there is some confusion. In Pathways of Change. Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 355–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witosz, Bozena
2017Metatext in the discourse of the theory of text, stylistics and pragmalinguistics. Forum Lingwistyczne 4: 107–112.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by 3 other publications

Ghaderi, Soleiman
2024. An investigation of Persian response signals from an interactive perspective. Folia Linguistica 0:0 DOI logo
Lorenz, David
2023. Could Be it’s Grammaticalization: Usage Patterns of the Epistemic Phrases(it) Could/Might Be. Journal of English Linguistics 51:2  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Walters, Gina Scarpete
2023. The Evolution of Temporal Adverbs into Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization or Pragmaticalization? The Case of Romanian atunci “then” and apoi “afterwards”. In Internal and External Causes of Language Change,  pp. 189 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.