Chapter published in:
Building Categories in Interaction: Linguistic resources at work
Edited by Caterina Mauri, Ilaria Fiorentini and Eugenio Goria
[Studies in Language Companion Series 220] 2021
► pp. 73110
Ariel, Mira & Mauri, Caterina
2018Why use “or”? Linguistics 56(5): 939–993. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter
2000On-line syntax—Oder: Was es bedeuten könnte die Zeitlichkeit der mündlischen Sprache ernst zu nehmen. Sprache und Literatur 85(31): 43–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Projection and minimalistic syntax in interaction. Discourse Processes 46(2–3): 180–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The temporality of language in interaction: Projection and latency. In Deppermann & Günthner (eds), 27–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter & Pfänder, Stefan
2007Multiple retractions in spoken French and spoken German. A contrastive study in oral performance styles. Cahiers de Praxématique 48: 57–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barotto, Allessandra
2018The role of exemplification in the construction of categories: The case of Japanese. Folia Linguistica 52: 37–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barotto, Allessandra & Mauri, Caterina
2018Constructing lists to construct categories. Rivista di Linguistica 30: 95–134.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
1983Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition 11(3): 211–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Couper-Kuhlen, Elisabeth
2011Action, prosody and emergent constructions: The case of “and.” In Auer & Pfänder (eds), 263–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla
1995I segnali discorsivi. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, Vol. III: Tipi di frase, deissi, formazione delle parole, Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi, & Anna Cardinaletti (eds), 225–257. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire
1990Un modèle d’analyse syntaxique “en grilles” pour les productions orales. Anuario de Psicología 47: 11–28.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2006From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4): 711–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Usage-based theory and exemplar representation. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 46–49. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bonvino, Elisabetta, Cortés Velásquez, Diego & Fiorenza, Elisa
2010“Sopratavola soprammobile come dite voi”: Lists in L1 and L2. Italian Journal of Linguistics 30(1): 201–230.Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna
1994Vague Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Conte, Maria-Elisabeth
1996 “Anaphoric encapsulation”. In Coherence and anaphora (= Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 10) Walter De Mulder & Liliane Tasmowski (eds.), 1–10.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective (Reprinted). Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio, Mancini, Federico, Vedovelli, Massimo & Voghera, Miriam
1993Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato. Milano: Etaslibri.Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio
. n.d. ‘Insomma’. In Il nuovo De Mauro. https://​dizionario​.internazionale​.it​/parola​/insomma> (24 March 2021).
Deppermann, Arnulf & Günthner, Susanne
(eds) 2015Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 27]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2015Usage-based construction grammar. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Eva Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds), 296–322. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2017Usage-based linguistics. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Mark Aronoff (ed.). Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, Jack
2014Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 359–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles, Thompson, Sandra A., Englebretson, Robert & Martey, Nii
2000–2005Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Parts 1–4. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek
1991Categories are for talking. On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory and Psychology 1(4): 515–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Discourse and Cognition. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1982Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles, Kay, Paul & O’ Connor, Mary Catherine
1988Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3): 501–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita
2019Reflections on the role of pragmatics in Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 11(2): 171–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
2010Beyond the sentence: Constructions, frames and spoken interaction. Constructions and Frames 2(2): 185–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fiorentini, Ilaria
2018aEccetera eccetera e così via di seguito. I general extenders dell’italiano contemporaneo. In Club Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 2, Francesca Masini & Fabio Tamburini (eds), 20–39. Bologna: Circolo Linguistico dell’Università di Bologna (CLUB).Google Scholar
2018b‘E le rimanenti cose’. “Eccetera” tra reticenza e inferenza. In Spazi bianchi. Le espressioni letterarie, linguistiche e visive dell’assenza, Alfonsina Buoniconto, Gerardo Salvati & Raffaele Cesaro (eds), 249–260. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar
Fox Tree, Jean E. & Schrock, Josef C.
2002Basic meanings of you know and I mean . Journal of Pragmatics 34(6): 727–747. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam
2010Grammar and interaction. New directions in constructional research. Constructions and Frames 2(2): 125–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara & Andorno, Cecilia
2014Vagueness markers as politeness strategies in an Italian radio phone-in show. Beiträge Zur Fremdsprachenvermittlung 20: 15–40.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at Work. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Goria, Eugenio
2020The discursive construction of categories. Categorisation as a dynamic and co-operative process. Language Sciences 81: 101233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goria, Eugenio, & Mauri, Caterina
2018Il corpus KIParla: Una nuova risorsa per lo studio dell’italiano parlato. In Club Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 2, Francesca Masini & Fabio Tamburini (eds), 96–116. Bologna: Circolo Linguistico dell’Università di Bologna (CLUB).Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2007Coordination. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 1–51. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2019Construction Grammar and its Application to English, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme
(eds) 2013The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1987Emergent grammar. In Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13: General Session and Parasession on Grammar and Cognition, Jon Aske, Natasha Berry, Laura A. Michaelis & Hana Filip (eds), 139–157. Berkeley CA: BLS. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Imo, Wolfgang
2015Interactional Construction Grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 1: 69–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1990List-construction as a task and resource. In Interactional Competence, George Psathas (ed.), 63–92. New York NY: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
2004Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Conversation Analysis. Studies from the First Generation [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 125], Gene H. Lerner (ed.), 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kahane, Sylvain & Pietrandrea, Paola
2012Types d’entassement en français. Actes du 3e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française. SHS Web of Conferences 1: 1809–1828.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Baisa, Vit, Bušta, Jan, Jakubíček, Miloš, Kovář, Vojtĕch, Michelfeit, Jan, Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vit
2014The Sketch Engine. Ten years on. Lexicography 1(1): 7–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H.
1991On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society 20: 441–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per
2005The Written Language Bias in Linguistics: Its Nature, Origins and Transformations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lo Baido, Maria Cristina
2018Mitigation via exemplification in present-day Italian: A corpus-based study. ELUA. Estudios de Lingüística Universidad de Alicante, (ELUA-2018, Anexo 4). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Masaryk University, NLP Centre
2011enTenTen, LINDAT/CLARIN digital library at the Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics (ÚFAL), Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/11858​/00​-097C​-0000​-0001​-CCDF​-8> (24 March 2021).
Masini, Francesca
2006Binomial constructions: Inheritance, specification and subregularities. Lingue e Linguaggio 5(2): 207–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Masini, Francesca & Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco
2018Listing between lexicon and syntax: Focus on frame-naming lists. Rivista di Linguistica 30: 135–172.Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca, Mauri, Caterina & Pietrandrea, Paola
2018List constructions: Towards a unified account. Italian Journal of Linguistics 30(1): 49–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Masini, Francesca & Pietrandrea, Paola
2010Magari. Cognitive Linguistics 21(1): 75–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mauri, Caterina
2008Coordination Relations in the Languages of Europe and Beyond. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Building and interpreting ad hoc categories: A linguistic analysis. In Formal Models in the Study of Language, Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stehanie Durrleman-Tame & Christophe Laenzlinger (eds), 297–326. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mauri, Caterina, Ballarè, Silvia, Goria, Eugenio, Cerruti, Massimo & Suriano, Francesco
2019aKIParla Corpus: A New Resource for Spoken Italian. In Proceedings of the Sixth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics. Bari, Italy, November 13–15, 2019, Raffaela Bernardi, Roberto Navigli & Giovanni Semeraro (eds). http://​ceur​-ws​.org​/Vol​-2481​/paper45​.pdf> (24 March 2021).
Mauri, Caterina, Goria, Eugenio & Fiorentini, Ilaria
2019bNon-exhaustive lists in spoken language. Constructions and Frames 11(2): 290–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt
1998bThe semantic status of discourse markers. Lingua 104(3–4): 235–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola
1999Coherence through understanding through discourse patterns: Focus on news reports. In Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 63], Wolf Bublitz, Uta Lenk & Eija Ventola (eds), 77–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Construction discourse: A prolegomenon. In Östman & Fried (eds), 121–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola & Fried, Mirjam
(eds) 2005Construction Grammars. Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions [Constructional Approaches to Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
1999Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pekarek-Doehler, Simona
2011Emergent grammar for all practical purposes: The on-line formatting of left- and right dislocations in French conversation. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, Peter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds), 45–87. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, Martin
2017The syntax of self-repair in German: An explanatory model. Journal of Pragmatics 119: 63–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret
2007Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics 39(3): 483–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
(eds) 2001Studies in Interactional Linguistics [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1979The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, 12: Discourse and Syntax, Talmy Givón (ed.), 261–286. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam
2013Tipi di “tipo” nel parlato e nello scritto. In Di linguistica e di sociolinguistica. Studi offerti a Norbert Dittmar, Immacolato Tempesta & Massimo Vedovelli (eds), 185–195. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam, Iacobini, Claudio, Savy, Renata, Cutugno, Francesco, De Rosa, Aurelio & Alfano, Iolanda
2014VoLIP: A searchable Italian spoken corpus. In Complex Visibles Out There, Ludmila Veselovská & Markéta Janebová (eds), 628–640. Olomouc: Palacký University.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard
2005Co-compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard
2006The rise of discourse markers in Italian: A specific type of language change. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 61–76. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Carston, Robyn
2007A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In Pragmatics, Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), 230–259. Houndmills: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar