Chapter published in:
Building Categories in Interaction: Linguistic resources at work
Edited by Caterina Mauri, Ilaria Fiorentini and Eugenio Goria
[Studies in Language Companion Series 220] 2021
► pp. 373414
References

References

Aijmer, Karin
2002English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Gisle
2001Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation. A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 84]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira & Mauri, Caterina
2018Why use or? Linguistics 56(5): 939–993. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
1983Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11(3): 211–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate
2007A politeness-theoretic approach to pragmatico-semantic change . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(1): 68–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent
1972Speculations on the growth of ethnobotanical nomenclature. Language in Society 1: 51–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992Ethnobiological classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte & Davidse, Kristin
2010The grammaticalization of nominal type noun constructions with kind/sort of: Chronology and paths of change. English Studies 91(2): 180–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
2007Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Chauveau-Thoumelin, Pierre
2016De l’exemplification à la catégorisation approximative: Étude de la construction [[X]SN genre [Y]SN]. Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française (CMLF 2016), Jul 2016, Tours, France. Actes du Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française. https://​www​.shs​-conferences​.org​/articles​/shsconf​/abs​/2016​/05​/shsconf​_cmlf2016​_12005​/shsconf​_cmlf2016​_12005​.html> (2 May 2017).
2018Exemplification and ad hoc categorization: The genre-construction in French. In Linguistic Strategies for the Construction of Ad Hoc Categories: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Caterina Mauri & Andrea Sansò (eds). Special issue of Folia Linguistica 52(s39–1):): 177–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny & Secova, Maria
2018The origins of new quotative expressions: The case of Paris French. Journal of French Language Studies 28(2): 209–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
2000Number. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Danon-Boileau, Laurent & Morel, Mary-Annick
1997 Question, point de vue, genre, style…: Les noms prépositionnels en français contemporain. Faits de Langues 9: 193–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine
2004Type specimens and scientific memory. Critical Inquiry 31(1): 153–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Smedt, Liesbeth, Brems, Lieselotte & Davidse, Kristin
2007NP-internal functions and extended uses of the ‘type’ nouns kind, sort, and type: Towards a comprehensive, corpus-based description. Language & Computers 62(1): 225–255.Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole & Stathi, Katerina
2016Grammaticalization and prosody: The case of english sort/kind/type of constructions. Language 92(4): 911–946. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denison, David
2002History of the sort of construction family. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Construction Grammar, Helsinki, 6–8 September 2002.
DHLF = Rey, Alain
1998Dictionnaire de la langue française. Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert.Google Scholar
Dufaye, Lionel
2016GENRE ou le scénario d’une grammaticalisation. LINX: Bulletin de Centre de Recherches Linguistiques de Paris-X Nanterre 10: 45–59.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne
1998Des jumeaux du discours: Genre et like . La Linguistique 34(2): 31–47.Google Scholar
FRANTEXT = Base textuelle FRANTEXT
Gelman, Susan A. & Kalish, Chuck W.
2006Conceptual development. In Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 2: Cognition, Perception and Language, Deanna Kuhn & Robert S. Siegler (eds), 687–733. New York NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Gelman, Susan A. & Brandone, Amanda C.
2010Fast-mapping placeholders: Using words to talk about kinds. Language Learning and Development 6(3): 223–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Godefroy, Frédéric
1881–1902Dictionnaire de l’ancienne langue française et de tous ses dialectes du IXe au XVe siècle. Paris: F. Vieweg.Google Scholar
Hampton, James A.
1997Conceptual combination. In Knowledge, Concepts and Categories, Koen Lamberts & David R. Shanks (eds), 133–159. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2003The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 211–242. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Buchholz, Oda
1998Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera & Dónall Ó Baoill (eds), 277–334. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002On the role of context in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Isambert, Paul
2016 Genre: Une mode récente mais qui vient de loin. Journal of French Language Studies 26(1): 85–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2011On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 852–897. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knittel, Marie-Laurence
2009Taxonomic adjectives in French: A syntactic account. https://​hal​.archives​-ouvertes​.fr​/hal​-00418115> (6 March 2019).
Kolyaseva, Alena F.
2018The ‘new’ Russian quotative tipa: Pragmatic scope and functions. Journal of Pragmatics 128: 82–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kornfeld, Laura Malena
2013Atenuadores en la lengua coloquial argentina. Lingüística 29(2): 17–49.Google Scholar
Lo Baido, Maria Cristina
2018Categorization via exemplification: Evidence from Italian. In Linguistic Strategies for the Construction of Ad Hoc Categories: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Caterina Mauri & Andrea Sansò (eds). Special issue of Folia Linguistica 52(s39–1): 69–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marques, Aldina
2015“Tipo”: Référentiation et modalisation dans des interactions verbales orales. In Travaux et documents 60, Maria Helena Araújo Carreira (ed.), 249–260. Paris: Université Paris 8.Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina
2017Building and interpreting ad hoc categories: A linguistic analysis. In Formal Models in the Study of Language: Applications in Interdisciplinary Contexts, Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stephanie Durrlemann-Tame & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds), 297–326. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mihatsch, Wiltrud
2007The construction of vagueness: ‘Sort of’ expressions in Romance languages. In Aspects of Meaning Constructing Meaning: From Concepts to Utterances, Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Koepcke, Thomas Berg & Peter Siemund (eds), 225–245. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009The approximators French comme, Italian come, Portuguese como and Spanish como from a grammaticalization perspective. In Grammaticalization and Pragmatics: Facts, Approaches, Theoretical Issues, Corinne Rossari, Claudia Ricci & Adriana Spiridon (eds), 65–91. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
2010„Wird man von Hustensaft wie so ne art bekifft?“ Approximationsmarker in romanischen Sprachen. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar
2016aType-noun binominals in four Romance languages. Language Sciences 53(Part B): 136–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016bCollectives, object mass nouns and individual count nouns: nouns between lexical and inflectional plural marking. In Lexical Plurals and Beyond, Peter Lauwers & Marie Lammert (eds). Special issue of Lingvisticæ Investigationes 39(2): 289–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018From ad hoc category to ad hoc categorization: The proceduralization of Argentinian Spanish tipo . In Linguistic Strategies for the Construction of Ad Hoc Categories: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Caterina Mauri & Andrea Sansò (eds). Special issue of Folia Linguistica 52(s39–1): 147–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hennecke, Inga & Mihatsch, Wiltrud
to appear). From taxonomic to pragmatic uses of French genre: Degrees of prosodic prominence as indicators of pragmaticalization. To appear in: Clear versus approximate categorisation: A crosslinguistic perspective, Hélène Vassiliadou & Marie Lammert eds. Cambridge Scholars
Mihatsch, Wiltrud
to appear a). Germanic, Romance and Slavic taxonomic nouns and their functions: An overview. To appear in Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move. Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Anna Kisiel, Alena Kolyaseva & Wiltrud Mihatsch eds. De Gruyter Series Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM], 352 De Gruyter Mouton URL https://​www​.degruyter​.com​/document​/isbn​/9783110701166​/html
to appear b). A panoramic view of Romance taxonomic nouns and their derivatives. To appear in Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move. Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Anna Kisiel, Alena Kolyaseva & Wiltrud Mihatsch eds. De Gruyter Series Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM], 352 De Gruyter Mouton URL https://​www​.degruyter​.com​/document​/isbn​/9783110701166​/html
OED = Murray, James
1884Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford: OUP. http://​dictionary​.oed​.com> (2 May 2017).
Pereira Lima-Hernandes, Maria Célia
2005A interface sociolingüística / gramaticalização: Estratificação de usos de tipo, feito, igual e como. Sincronia e diacronia. PhD dissertation, University of Campinas.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor, Mervis, Carolyn, Gray, Wayne, Johnson, David W. & Braem Penny Boyes
1976Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8: 382–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosenkvist, Henrik & Skärlund, Sanna
2013Grammaticalization in the present – The changes of modern Swedish typ . In Synchrony and Diachrony: A Dynamic Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 133], Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli (eds), 313–338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosier, Laurence
2002 Genre: Le nuancier de la grammaticalisation. Travaux de Linguistique 44(1): 79–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rouget, Christine
1997Espèce de, genre de, sorte de: Approximatifs ou sous-catégorisateurs? In Psychomécanique du langage. Problèmes et perspectives. Actes du 7e Colloque International de Psychomécanique du langage (Cordoue, 2–4 June 1994), Paulo de Carvalho & Olivier Soutet (eds), 289–298. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Sloutsky, Vladimir M.
2010From perceptual categories to concepts: What develops? Cognitive Science 34: 1244–1286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Edward E.
1995Concepts and categorization. In Thinking. An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Vol. 3, Edward E. Smith & D. N. Osherson (eds), 3–33. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
TLFi = Trésor de la Langue Française informatisé
Ullman, Michael T.
2004Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative / procedural model. Cognition 92(1–2): 231–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan
2013Semantic maps, for synchronic and diachronic typology. In Synchrony and Diachrony: A Dynamic Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 133], Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli (eds), 153–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vladimirska, Elena
2016Entre le dire et le monde: Le cas du marqueur discursif genre. In Nouveaux regards sur l’approximation et la précision, Silvia Adler, Hava Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot & Maria Asnes (eds), 195–209. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam
2013A case study on the relationship between grammatical change and synchronic variation: The emergence of tipo[-N] in Italian. In In Synchrony and Diachrony: A Dynamic Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 133], Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli (eds), 283–312. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Gregory & Birner, Betty
1995Definiteness and the English existential. Language 71(4): 722–742. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, Sandra R. & Gelman, Susan A.
2010Different kinds of concepts and different kinds of words: What words do for human cognition. In The Making of Human Concepts [Oxford Series in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience], Denis Mareschal, Paul C. Quinn & Stephen E. G. Lea (eds), 99–129. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zamparelli, Roberto
2000Layers in the Determiner Phrase. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar