Miscellaneous published in:
Pejorative Suffixes and Combining Forms in English
José A. Sánchez Fajardo
[Studies in Language Companion Series 222] 2022
► pp. 213–223

References

Abbott, Andrew.
2014 The problem of excess. Sociological Theory 32 (1): 1-26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Keith.
2007 The pragmatics of connotation. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (6): 1047-1057. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008  Metaphor and Metonymy: A Diachronic Approach . Chichester, W. Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
2016 Pragmatics in language change and lexical creativity. SpringerPlus 5. https://​springerplus​.springeropen​.com​/articles​/10​.1186​/s40064​-016​-1836​-y. Crossref
>
Allan, Keith & Burridge, Kate.
1991  Euphemism & Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2006  Forbidden Words. Taboo and the Censoring of Language . Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Irving L.
1998 Slang: Sociology. In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics , J. L. Mey & R. E. Asher (eds), 878-883. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Allen, Margaret R.
1978 Morphological Investigations. Ph.D. Dissertations, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Anderson, Luvell & Lepore, Ernie.
2013 Slurring words. Noûs 47 (1): 25-48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, Lars G. & Trudgill, Peter.
1990  Bad Language . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nigel.
2005  Translation, Linguistics, Culture: A French-English Handbook . Clevedon/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark & Fudeman, Kirsten.
(2005) 2011  What is Morphology? Malden/Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Augustyn, Rafał & Gniecka, Agata.
2011 Irony behind diminutives: A cognitive linguistic analysis of popular technical terms. Lubelskie Materaly Neofilologiczne 35: 31-49.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Anthony E.
1992 Connotation. In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistics , W. Bright (ed), 297-298. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Balteiro, Isabel.
2007  The Directionality of Conversion in English . Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Barbe, Katharina.
1995  Irony in Context . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardsley, Dianne & Simpson, Jane.
2009 Hypocoristics in New Zealand and Australian English. In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond , P. Peters, P. Collins & A. Smith (eds), 49-69. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baron, Naomi S.
2004 See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23: 397-423. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, Jamie, Reffin, Jeremy, Rumball, Noelle & Williamson, Sarah
2014  Anti-Social Media . London: Demos.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie.
(1983) 1989  English Word-formation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994  Introducing Linguistic Morphology . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
1998 Is there a class of neoclassical compounds, and if so is it productive? Linguistics 36: 403-422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004  A Glossary of Morphology . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2014 Rare, obscure and marginal affixes in English. Lexis 8. https://​journals​.openedition​.org​/lexis​/304 Crossref
2016 Re-evaluating exocentricity in word-formation. In Morphological Metatheory , D. Siddiqi & H. Harley (eds), 461-477. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 Metonymy and the semantics of word-formation. In MMM11 Online proceedings , N. Koutsoukos, J. Audring & I. Masini (eds), 1-13.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie & Huddleston, Rodney.
2002 Lexical word-formation. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , R. Huddleston & G. K. Pullum (eds), 1621–1721. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo
2015  The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Behrens, Heike.
2009 Grammatical categories. In The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language [Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics ], E. Bavin (ed), 199-216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Besedina, Natalia.
2012 Evaluation through morphology: A cognitive perspective. In Proceedings of CLA Meeting 1, 177-192.Google Scholar
Bisetto, Antonietta & Scalise, Sergio.
2005 The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio 4 (2): 319-332.Google Scholar
Bochnak, M. Ryan & Csipak, Eva.
2014 A new metalinguistic degree morpheme. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 24 , T. Snider, S. D’Antonio & M. Weigand (eds), 432-452.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Renée Jorgensen.
2017 The pragmatics of slurs. Noûs 51 (3): 439-462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert.
(2005) 2007  The Grammar of Words . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2009 Word-formation templates and the hierarchical lexicon. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding , R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 201-2016. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010  Construction Morphology . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2015 Construction morphology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology , A. Hippisley & G. T. Stump (eds), 424-448. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2019 The role of schemas in Construction Morphology. Word Structure 12 (3): 385-395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, Jeffrey S. & Pleydell-Pearce, Christopher W.
2011 Swearing, euphemisms, and linguistic relativity. PLoS ONE 6 (7). https://​journals​.plos​.org​/plosone​/arti/​/cle​?id​=10​.1371​/journal​.pone​.0022341 Crossref
Breidenbach, Carla M.
2006 Deconstructing Mock Spanish: A multidisciplinary analysis of Mock Spanish as racism, humor, and insult. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
Brennan, Susan E.
1998 The grounding problem in conversations with and through computers. In Social and Cognitive Psychological Approaches to Interpersonal Communication , S. R. Fussell & R. J. Kreuz (eds), 201-225. Hilllsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C.
1987  Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burridge, Kate.
2004  Blooming English . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012 Euphemism and language change: The sixth and seventh ages. Lexis 7: 65-91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butt, John & Benjamin, Carmen.
1994 Diminutive, augmentative and pejorative suffixes. A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish . Boston, MA: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butterly, Amelia.
2015 Warning: Why using the term ‘coloured’ is offensive. BBC Newsbeat 27 January 2015 <https://​www​.bbc​.co​.uk​/newsbeat​/article​/30999175​/warning​-why​-using​-the​-term​-coloured​-is​-offensive
Cannon, Garland.
1987  Historical Change and English Word-Formation . New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Carner-Morley, Jess.
2020 The new taboo: How ‘flattering’ became fashion’s ultimate F-word. The Guardian 12 August 2020 <https://​www​.theguardian​.com​/fashion​/2020​/aug​/12​/the​-new​-taboo​-how​-flattering​-became​-fashions​-ultimate​-f​-word
Carston, Robyn.
2003 Truth-conditional semantics. In The Handbook of Pragmatics Online , J. Östman & J. Verschueren (eds). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Casas Gómez, Miguel.
2012 The expressive creativity of euphemism and dysphemism. Lexis 7. https://​journals​.openedition​.org​/lexis​/349 Crossref
2018 Lexicon, discourse and cognition: Terminological delimitations in the conceptualizations of linguistic taboo. In Linguistic Taboo Revisited , A. Pizarro Pedraza (ed), 13-32. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cervi, David & Wajnryb, Ruth.
1992 Coping with Aussie English. English Today 8 (2): 18-21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Channell, Joanna.
1999 Corpus-based analysis of evaluative lexis. In Evaluation in Text , S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds), 38-55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ciszek, Ewa.
2012 The Middle English suffix ‑ish: Reasons for decline in productivity. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 47 (2–3): 27-39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter.
2012 Australian English: Its evolution and current state. International Journal of Language, Translation and Intercultural Communication 1 (1): 75-86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crespo Fernández, Eliecer.
2008 Sex-related euphemism and dysphemism: An analysis in terms of Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Atlantis 30 (2): 95-110.Google Scholar
2015  Sex in Language: Euphemistic and Dysphemistic Metaphors in Internet Forums . London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2018 Taboos in speaking of sex and sexuality. In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language , K. Allan (ed), 41-60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croom, Adam M.
2011 Slurs. Language Sciences 33: 343-358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 How to do things with slurs. Studies in the way of derogatory words. Language & Communication 33: 177-204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 The semantics of slurs: A refutation of coreferentialism. Ampersand 2: 30-38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, Terry.
(1992) 1997  An Introduction to Historical Linguistics . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan.
1986  Lexical Semantics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David.
1996 Reflecting linguistic change. The Teacher Trainer 10 (1): 15-16.Google Scholar
Cuddon, J. A.
2012  A Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory . Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane.
1996  The French Influence on Middle English Morphology . Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane & Plag, Ingo.
2000 Categorywise, some compound type morphemes seem to be rather suffix-like: On the status of ‑ful, ‑type, and ‑wise in Present Day English. Folia Linguistica 34 (3–4): 225-245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davie, Jim.
2018  Slang across Societies: Motivations and Constructions . New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole & Stahi, Katerina.
2016 Grammaticalization and prosody: The case of English sort/kind/type of constructions. Language 92 (4): 911-947. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Klerk, Vivian & Antrobus, Richard.
2004 Swamp-donkeys and Rippers: The use of slang and pejorative terms to name ‘the other’. Alternation 11 (2): 264-282.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
2004 Adjective classes in typological perspective. In Adjective Classes: A Cross-linguistic Typology , R. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 1-49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014  Making New Words: Morphological Derivation in English . Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U.
2000 Extragrammatical vs. marginal morphology. In Extragrammatical and Marginal Morphology , U. Doleschal & A. M. Thornton (eds), 1-10. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia.
2001 Morphopragmatics of diminutives and augmentatives: On the priority of pragmatics over semantics. In Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics and Discourse: A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer , I. Kenesei & R. M. Harnish (eds), 43-58. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drößiger, Hans-Harry.
2017 On evaluative conceptualizations of swear words and invectives. Athens Journal of Philology 4 (3): 201-218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eble, Connie.
1996  Slang and Sociability: In-group Language among College Students . Chapel Hill/London: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Eitelmann, Matthias, Haugland, Kari E. & Haumann, Dagmar
2020 From engl-isc to whatever-ish: a corpus-based investigation of ‑ish derivation in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics 24 (4): 801-831. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles.
1997  Mappings in Thought and Language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Turner, Mark.
2002  The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities . New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita, Meibauer, Jörg & Wiese, Heiker
2016 What is pejoration, and how can it be expressed in language? In Pejoration , R. Finkbeiner, J. Meibauer & H. Wiese (eds), 1-20. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fradin, Bernard.
2000 Combining forms, blends and related phenomena. In Extragrammatical and Marginal Morphology , U. Doleschal & A. M. Thornton (eds), 11-59. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Furiassi, Cristiano, Pulcini, Virginia & Rodríguez González, Félix
(eds) 2012  The Anglicization of European Lexis . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Games, Alex.
2006  Kick the Bucket and Swing the Cat: The Balderdash & Piffle Collection of English Words, and Their Curious Origins . London: BBC Books.Google Scholar
Garner, Bryan A.
2003  Modern American Usage . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geraeerts, Dirk.
1997  Diachronic Prototype Semantics. A Contribution to Historical Lexicology . Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ghomeshi, Jila, Jackendoff, Ray, Rosen, Nicole & Russel, Kevin
2004 Contrastive focus reduplication in English (The Salad-Salad Paper). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 307-357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W.
2011 Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes 48 (8): 529-562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff.
2003 Componential Analysis. In Handbook of Pragmatics Online , J. Ola Östman & J. Verschueren (eds). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2015 “Swear words” and “curse words” in Australian (and American) English. At the crossroads of pragmatics, semantics and sociolinguistics. Intercultural Pragmatics 12 (2): 189-218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, Kyle & MacKenzie, Laurel.
2009 A po-mo boho in SoHo: Emerging specificity in English templatic hypocoristics. Paper presented at the LSA Annual Meeting , San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Grandi, Nicola & Körtvélyessy, Livia.
2015 Introduction: Why evaluative morphology? In The Edinburgh Handbook of Evaluative Morphology , N. Grandi & L. Körtvélyessy (eds), 4-17. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sydney.
1970  Verb-intensifier Collocations in English . Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul.
1975 Logic and conversation. In The Logic of Grammar , D. Davidson & G. Harman (eds), 64-75. Encino, CA: Dickenson.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1978  Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning . Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Hamans, Camiel.
2020 How an ‘Italian’ suffix became productive in Germanic languages. In The Interaction of Borrowing and Word Formation , P. ten Hacken & R. Panocová (eds), 140-161. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamawand, Zeki.
2011  Morphology in English: Word-Formation in Cognitive Grammar . New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Harris, Tabea.
2020 Vagueness, context-sensitivity, and scale structure in four types of adjectives with the suffix ‑ish . In Quantification and Scales in Change , R. Gergel & J. Watkins (eds), 67-84. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Hedger, Joseph A.
2013 Meaning and racial slurs. Derogatory epithets and the semantics-pragmatics interface. Language & Communication 33: 205-213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hester, Helen.
2014  Beyond Explicit. Pornography and the Displacement of Sex . Albany: State of New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H.
2008  The Everyday Language of White Racism . Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas.
2017 Construction grammars. In The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics , B. Dancygier (ed), 310-329. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hohenhaus, Peter.
2007 How to do (even more) things with nonce words. In Lexical Creativity, Texts and Context , J. Munat (ed), 15-38. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holleb, Morgan L. E.
2019  The A-Z of Gender and Sexuality . London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Hom, Christopher.
2008 The semantics of racial epithets. Journal of Philosophy 105: 416-440. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Pejoratives. Philosophy Compass 5 (2): 164-185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
(1993) 2003  Grammaticalization . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huffaker, David A. & Calvert, Sandra L.
2005 Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10 (2). https://​onlinelibrary​.wiley​.com​/doi​/full​/10​.1111​/j​.10836101​.2005​.tb00238​.x Crossref
Hughes, Geoffrey.
2006  An Encyclopedia of Swearing . London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Iacobini, Claudio & Giuliani, Alessandro
2010 A multidimensional approach to the classification of combining forms. Italian Journal of Linguistics 22 (2): 287-316.Google Scholar
Jamet, Denis.
2009 A morphophonological approach to clipping in English. Lexis 1. https://​journals​.openedition​.org​/lexis​/884 Crossref
Jeshion, Ronin.
2013 Expressivism and the offensiveness of slurs. Philosophical Perspectives 27: 231-259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel.
1996 Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72 (3): 533-78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter.
2009 Astronaut, astrology, astrophysics: About combining forms, classical compounds and affixoids. In Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on New Approaches in Historical Lexis (HEL-LEX 2 ), R. W. McConchie, A. Honkapohja & J. Tyrkko (eds), 1-13. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Projects.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Randall.
2003  The Strange Case of a Troublesome Word . New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Kidd, Evan, Kemp, Nenagh & Quinn, Sara
2011 Did you have a choccie bickie this arvo? A quantitative look at Australian hypocoristics. Language Sciences 33: 359-368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kołłątaj, Andrzej
2016 Reduplication in English: Typology, correlation with slang and metaphorisation. Polilog. Studia Neofilologiczne 6: 237-248.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd.
2020  English Linguistics . Berlin: J. B. Metzler. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2017 Conceptual metaphor theory. In The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language , E. Semino & Z. Demjén (eds), 13-27. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán & Radden, Günter
1998 Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic point of view. Cognitive Linguistics 9: 37-77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George.
1987  Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind . Chicago: Chicago University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993 The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought , A. Ortony (ed), 202-251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 Metaphor, morality, and politics, or, why conservatives have left liberals in the dust. Social Research 62: 177-213.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1980  Metaphors We Live by . Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1997 The contextual basis of cognitive semantics. In Language and Conceptualization , J. Nuyts & E. Pederson (eds), 229-252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lardier, Donna.
2006 Words and their parts. In An Introduction to Language and Linguistics , R. W. Fasold & J. Connor-Linton (eds), 56-96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lederer, Jenny.
2013 ‘Anchor baby’: A conceptual explanation for pejoration. Journal of Pragmatics 57: 248-266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey.
1974  Semantics . Harmondsworth: Pinguins Books.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne.
2007 Blendalicious. In Lexical Creativity, Texts and Contexts , J. Munat (ed), 115-133. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leisi, Ernst.
1969 Das heutige Englisch. Wesenszüge und Probleme (5th edition). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Leith, Dick
(1983) 1997  A Social History of English (2nd edition). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lewis, Gail & Phoenix, Ann
2004 ‘Race’, ‘ethnicity’, and ‘identity’. In Questioning Identity: Gender, Class, Ethnicity , K. Woodward (ed), 115-150. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle.
2009 IE, Germanic: English. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding , R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 357-369. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lillo Buades, Antonio.
2018 Etymological myths and compound etymologies in rhyming slang. English Studies 99 (6): 688-703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lipka, Leonhard.
2002  English Lexicology: Lexical Structure, Word Semantics and Word-Formation . Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Louw, Bill.
1993 Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer?—the diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In Text and Technology , M. Baker, G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 157-176. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov.
1966 Genetic analysis of word formation. Current Trends in Linguistics 3: 305-364.Google Scholar
1977 Why ap-ish but worm-y? In Studies in Descriptive and Historical Linguistics , P. J. Hopper (ed), 341-364. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, Hans.
1969 The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation (2nd edition). Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Mattiello, Elisa.
2005 The pervasiveness of slang in standard and non-standard English. Mots Palabras Words 6: 7-41.Google Scholar
2013 Extra-Grammatical Morphology in English: Abbreviations, Blends, Reduplicatives, and Related Phenomena. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 Analogical neologisms in English. Italian Journal of Linguistics 28 (2): 1-40.Google Scholar
2018 Paradigmatic morphology splinters, combining forms, and secreted affixes. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 15 (1): 2-22.Google Scholar
Mattiello, Elisa & Dressler, Wolfgang U.
2018 The morphosemantic transparency/opacity of novel English analogical compounds and compound families. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 53: 67-114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mattiello, Elisa, Ritt-Benmimoun, Veronika & Dressler, Wolfgang U.
2021 Asymmetric use of diminutives and hypocoristics to pet animals in Italian, German, English, and Arabic. Language and Communication 76: 136-153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McAndrew, Alex.
1992 Hosties and Garbos: A look behind diminutives and pejoratives in Australian English. In Language and Civilization: A Concerted Profusion of Essays and Studies in Honour of Otto Hietsch , C. Blank (ed), 166-184. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
McGregor, William B.
2015  Linguistics: An Introduction . London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia & Dressler, Wolfgang U.
2020 Pragmatics explanations in morphology. In Word Knowledge and Word Usage , V. Pirrelli, I. Plag & W. U. Dressler (eds), 405-452. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Danielle.
2005 Producing containment: The rhetorical construction of difference in Will and Grace . The Journal of Popular Culture 38 (6): 1050-1068. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagano, Akiko.
2008  Conversion and Back-Formation in English . Toward a Theory of Morpheme-Based Morphology . Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Neuhaus, H. Joachim.
1977 Wortbilgungssemantik. In Perspektiven der Wortbildungforschung , H. Brekle & D. Kastovsky (eds), 203-209. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Gerald V.
2009 Metaphors and the pejorative framing of marginalized groups: Implications for social work education. Journal of Social Work Education 45 (1): 29-46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Susan.
2014 Delineating derivation and compounding. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology , R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 26-49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, Isabel.
2017 Towards a morphosyntactic analysis of -ish. Word Structure 10 (1): 54-78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita.
2011 Metonymization: A key mechanism in semantic change. In Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View , A. Barcelona, R. Benczes & F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds), 61-88. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, Efrén
2020 ‘People of color’ are protesting. Here’s what you need to know about this new identity. The Washington Post 2 July 2020 <https://​www​.washingtonpost​.com​/politics​/2020​/07​/02​/people​-color​-are​-protesting​-heres​-what​-you​-need​-know​-about​-this​-new​-identity/
Plag, Ingo.
(2003) 2018 Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prćić, Tvrtko.
2005 Prefixes vs. final combining forms in English: A lexicographic perspective. International Journal of Lexicography 18: 313-334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Suffixes vs. final combining forms in English: A lexicographic perspective. International Journal of Lexicography 21 (1): 1-22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter & Kövecses, Zóltan.
1999 Towards a theory of metonymy. In Metonymy in Language and Thought , K. U. Panther (ed), 17-60. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Renner, Vincent, Maniez, François & Arnaud, Pierre J. L.
2012 Introduction: A bird’s-eye view of lexical blending. In Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Lexical Blending , V. Renner, F. Maniez & P. J. L. Arnaud (eds), 1-11. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez González, Félix & Sánchez Fajardo, José A.
2018 Motives for clipped words in English and Spanish word-formation. Neologica 12: 219-235.Google Scholar
Rodríguez González, Félix & Knospe, Sebastian.
2019 The variation of calques in European languages, with particular reference to German and Spanish: Main patterns and trends. Folia Linguistica 53 (1): 233-276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José.
1998 El modelo cognitivo idealizado de ‘tamaño’ y la formación de aumentativos y diminutivos en español. In Estudios Cognoscitivos del Español I , R. Maldonado (ed), 355-373. Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas UNAM.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Gómez-González, María de los Ángeles.
2014 Constructing discourse and discourse constructions. In Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space , M. A. Gómez-González, F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza & F. Gonzálvez-García (eds), 295-314. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez Fajardo, José A.
2018 Porn: Not all that glitters is sex. American Speech 93 (1): 143-150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 Exploring the ‘shashification’ of teenage slang. English Today 35 (3): 49-54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020 On the analogical suffixation of paired antonyms: The case of English innie and outie . Atlantis. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 42 (1): 189-211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez Fajardo, José A. & Tarasova, Elizaveta.
2020 Of brownie girls and Aussie families: A new look at morphosemantic paradigmaticity in Adj+ie/y nominalisations. In Paradigmatic Relations in Derivational Morphology , J. Fernández-Domínguez, A. Bagasheva & C. Lara-Clares (eds), 186-212. Amsterdam: Brill.Google Scholar
Santibáñez Sáez, Francisco.
1999 Conceptual interaction and Spanish diminutives. Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica 25: 173-190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Bisetto, Antonietta.
2009 The classification of compounds. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding , R. Lieber & P. Štekauer, 34-53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P.
2003  Diminutives in English . Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schreuder, Hindrik.
1970  Pejorative Sense Development in English . College Park, MD: McGrath Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Sendlmeier, Walter, Steffen, Ines & Bartels, Astrid.
2016 Pejorative prosody. In Pejoration , R. Finkbeiner, J. Meibauer & H. Wiese (eds), 21-40. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shields, Kenneth, Jr.
2001 On the origin of English diminutive suffix -y, -ie. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: International Review of English Studies 37: 141-144.Google Scholar
Siddiqi, Daniel.
2011 The English intensifier ass. Snippets 23: 16-17.Google Scholar
Silva, Penny
(ed) 1996  A Dictionary of South African English . New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jane.
2004 Hypocoristics in Australian English. In A Handbook of Varieties of English: Vol. II , B. Kortmann & E. Schneider (eds), 643-656. Berlin: Mouton de Guyter.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John
(ed) 1987  Looking Up. An Account of the COBUILD Project in Lexical Computing . London/Glasgow: Collins.Google Scholar
Smith, Hiram L.
2019 Has nigga been reappropriated as a term of endearment?: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. American Speech 94 (4): 420-477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Rachel.
2011 Urban dictionary: Youth slanguage and the redefining of definition: What’s up with meep and other words in the Urban Dictionary. English Today 27 (4): 43-48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steinmetz, Sol & Kipfer, Barbara Ann.
2006  The Life of Language: The Fascinating Ways Words Are Born, Live and Die . New York. Random House.Google Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol.
1998  An Onomasiological Theory of English Word-Formation . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Dominic.
2010  Semantic Prosody . New York/London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael.
1995a Collocations and cultural connotations of common words. Linguistics and Education 7 (4): 379-390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995b Collocations and semantic profiles: On the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of Language 2 (1): 23-55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svorou, Soteria.
2012 Relational constructions in cognitive linguistics. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics , D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Szymanek, Bogdan.
2005 The latest trends in English word-formation. In Handbook of Word-formation , P. Štekauer & R. Lieber (eds), 429-448. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Denis, Derek.
2008 Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech 83 (1): 3-34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali.
2016  Teen Talk: The Language of Adolescents . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tarasova, Elizaveta & Sánchez Fajardo, José A.
2020 Iconicity and word-formation: An examination of Adj+ie/y nominalisations through a bidirectional conceptualisation model. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34: 331-343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
forthcoming Adj+ie/y nominalisations in contemporary English: From diminution to pejoration. In Grammar of Hate , N. Knoblock (ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R.
(1989) 2003  Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Technau, Björn.
2018 Going beyond hate speech: The pragmatics of ethnic slur terms. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14 (1): 25-43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tenchini, María Paola & Frigerio, Aldo.
2020 The impoliteness of slurs and other pejoratives in reported speech. Corpus Pragmatics 4: 273-291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomić, Gorica.
2019 Headedness in contemporary English slang blends. Lexis 14. https://​journals​.openedition​.org​/lexis​/3862
Tournier, Jean.
1985  Introduction Descriptive à la Lexicogénétique de l’Anglais Contemporain . Paris/Geneva: Champion-Slatkine.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2012 Pragmatics and language change. In Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics , K. Allan & K. Jaszczolt (eds), 549-565. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Semantic change. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics . Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme.
2013  Constructionalization and Constructional Changes . Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullmann, Stephen.
1962  Semantics: An Introduction to the Science of Meaning . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vallée, Richard.
2014 Slurring and common knowledge of ordinary language. Journal of Pragmatics 61: 78-90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varner, Natasha.
2016 Shesouke Sasaki’s 20-year battle to eradicate “jap” from Print Media. Densho Blog https://​densho​.org​/shosukesasaki/
Warren, Beatrice.
1990 The importance of combining forms. In Contemporary Morphology , W. U. Dressler, H. C. Luschützky, O. E. Pfeiffer & J. R. Rennison (eds), 111-132. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wescott, Roger W.
1978 Zazzification in American Slang. Forum Linguisticum 3 (2): 185-187.Google Scholar
Whiting, Daniel.
2013 It’s not what you said, it’s the way you said it: Slurs and conventional implicatures. Analytic Philosophy 54: 364-377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitsitt, Samuel P.
2013  Metonymy, Synecdoche, and the Disorders of Contiguity . Padova: Libreria Universitaria.Google Scholar
Widawski, Maciej.
2003  Anatomy of American Slang . Warszawa-Chicago: Galeria Polskiej Książki.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna.
1982 Why can you have a drink when you *can’t have an eat? Language 58: 753-799. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1985 Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts: Polish vs. English. Journal of Pragmatics 9 (2–3): 145-78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986 Does language reflect culture? Evidence from Australian English. Language in Society 15: 349-374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard.
1985  Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Charlotte, Soydan, Haluk & Johnson, Mark R. D.
(eds) 1998  Social Work and Minorities: European Perspectives . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy.
2009 Reference, inference and the semantics of pejoratives. In The Philosophy of David Kaplan , J. Almog & P. Leonardi (eds), 137-159. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeschel, Arne
2012  Incipient Productivity . A Construction-Based Approach to Linguistic Creativity . Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar