192027509 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code SLCS 225 Eb 15 9789027257420 06 10.1075/slcs.225 13 2022026482 00 EA E107 10 01 JB code SLCS 02 0165-7763 02 225.00 01 02 Studies in Language Companion Series Studies in Language Companion Series 11 01 JB code jbe-all 01 02 Full EBA collection (ca. 4,200 titles) 11 01 JB code jbe-eba-2023 01 02 Compact EBA Collection 2023 (ca. 700 titles, starting 2018) 11 01 JB code jbe-2022 01 02 2022 collection (96 titles) 01 01 Paradigms in Word Formation Theory and applications Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and applications 1 B01 01 JB code 507426049 Alba E. Ruz Ruz, Alba E. Alba E. Ruz University of Granada 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/507426049 2 B01 01 JB code 822426050 Cristina Fernández-Alcaina Fernández-Alcaina, Cristina Cristina Fernández-Alcaina Charles University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/822426050 3 B01 01 JB code 155426051 Cristina Lara-Clares Lara-Clares, Cristina Cristina Lara-Clares University of Granada 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/155426051 01 eng 11 390 03 03 vii 03 00 382 03 10 LAN009020 12 CF/2AB 24 JB code LIN.ENG English linguistics 24 JB code LIN.GERM Germanic linguistics 24 JB code LIN.MORPH Morphology 24 JB code LIN.SYNTAX Syntax 24 JB code LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 01 06 02 00 The focus of Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and applications is on the relevance of paradigms for linguistic description. 03 00 The focus of Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and applications is on the relevance of paradigms for linguistic description. Paradigmatic organization has traditionally been considered an inherent feature of inflectional morphology, but research in the last decades clearly shows the existence of paradigms in word formation, especially in affixal derivation, often at the expense of other word-formation processes. This volume seeks to address the role that paradigms may play in the description of compounding, conversion and participles. This volume should be of interest to anyone specialized in the field of English morphology and word formation. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/slcs.225.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027211583.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027211583.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/slcs.225.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/slcs.225.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/slcs.225.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/slcs.225.hb.png 01 01 JB code slcs.225.ack-p1 06 10.1075/slcs.225.ack-p1 vii viii 2 Miscellaneous 1 01 04 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.int 06 10.1075/slcs.225.int Section header 2 01 04 Introduction Introduction 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.01gae 06 10.1075/slcs.225.01gae 3 18 16 Chapter 3 01 04 Chapter 1. Dangerous liaisons Chapter 1. Dangerous liaisons 01 04 An introduction to derivational paradigms An introduction to derivational paradigms 1 A01 01 JB code 562444863 Livio Gaeta Gaeta, Livio Livio Gaeta University of Turin 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/562444863 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.p1 06 10.1075/slcs.225.p1 Section header 4 01 04 Part I. Theoretical background Part I. Theoretical background 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.02mel 06 10.1075/slcs.225.02mel 21 56 36 Chapter 5 01 04 Chapter 2. For a topology of derivational paradigms Chapter 2. For a topology of derivational paradigms 1 A01 01 JB code 265444864 Chiara Melloni Melloni, Chiara Chiara Melloni University of Verona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/265444864 2 A01 01 JB code 538444865 Serena Dal Maso Dal Maso, Serena Serena Dal Maso University of Verona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/538444865 01 eng 30 00

In recent times, paradigmatic approaches to word formation have become increasingly popular, but the very concept of derivational paradigm is still far from being clear and universally accepted: while paradigms are a useful construct for the treatment of inflectional phenomena, less straightforward is their adoption in the realm of derivation, which is characterized by numerous gaps and inconsistencies. The aim of our theoretical contribution is to discuss the representation that morphological entities and derivational relationships receive in paradigmatic approaches, especially those which are gaining popularity in recent developments of the research. Specifically, we will reflect on how word-internal and word-external morphological relationships are explained and modeled in different topological representations, starting from traditional organizations of cells in columns, to three-dimensional arrangements of morphological families, to schematic representations along the lines of the Construction Morphology framework and, finally, to Bybee’s multidimensional networks.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.p2 06 10.1075/slcs.225.p2 Section header 6 01 04 Part II. Compounding Part II. Compounding 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.03bau 06 10.1075/slcs.225.03bau 59 68 10 Chapter 7 01 04 Chapter 3. Interlocking paradigms in English compounds Chapter 3. Interlocking paradigms in English compounds 1 A01 01 JB code 354444866 Laurie Bauer Bauer, Laurie Laurie Bauer Victoria University of Wellington 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/354444866 01 eng 30 00

In this contribution, I consider the paradigmatic structure of compounds in English, showing that the various paradigms overlap and interlock, leading to a network of paradigmatic structures. I briefly consider the implications of such a structure for non-compound structures as well, and discuss how to deal with the productivity of paradigmatic structures in such a framework.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.04bag 06 10.1075/slcs.225.04bag 69 98 30 Chapter 8 01 04 Chapter 4. Fact-checking on compound verbs in English Chapter 4. Fact-checking on compound verbs in English 1 A01 01 JB code 905444867 Alexandra Bagasheva Bagasheva, Alexandra Alexandra Bagasheva Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/905444867 2 A01 01 JB code 175444868 Jesús Fernández-Domínguez Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús Jesús Fernández-Domínguez University of Granada 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/175444868 01 eng 30 00

The creation of compound verbs remains among the most contested phenomena of English word formation and the studies targeting these units have normally portrayed them as inconsistent or almost anomalous. This perception, together with the heterogeneous origins and the contested status of compound verbs, might explain why two central questions remain unanswered: (i) are these genuine compounds? and (ii) how can they be analyzed in a uniform manner? This paper tackles English verbal compounding with two hypotheses in mind: (i) that it is crucial to differentiate between a product- and a process-oriented approach to the phenomenon, and (ii) that a paradigm-based analysis acknowledging the role of analogy and the weight of metonymy proves highly beneficial.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.05cet 06 10.1075/slcs.225.05cet 99 128 30 Chapter 9 01 04 Chapter 5. Paradigm families in compounding Chapter 5. Paradigm families in compounding 01 04 The case of English compound nouns headed by -er deverbal nouns The case of English compound nouns headed by - er deverbal nouns 1 A01 01 JB code 942444869 Bozena Cetnarowska Cetnarowska, Bozena Bozena Cetnarowska University of Silesia in Katowice 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/942444869 01 eng 30 00

This chapter demonstrates the applicability of the notion of derivational paradigms and word-formation families to the study of compounds. Three families of English compounds are investigated which are headed by deverbal -er nominals. The semantic homogeneity of each of those compound families is assessed by analysing data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), supplemented by some lexicographic searches and web searches. This involves the examination of the polysemy of the head nouns, the implicit semantic relation between compound elements and the transparency (or opacity) of the compounds which belong to the selected compound families. Comments are provided on the use of construction schemas to generalize over the internal structure and semantic interpretation of compound families (or subfamilies).

01 01 JB code slcs.225.06mat 06 10.1075/slcs.225.06mat 129 152 24 Chapter 10 01 04 Chapter 6. Derivational paradigms Chapter 6. Derivational paradigms 01 04 The case of English combining forms The case of English combining forms 1 A01 01 JB code 659444870 Elisa Mattiello Mattiello, Elisa Elisa Mattiello University of Pisa 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/659444870 01 eng 30 00

This chapter investigates a set of ten English combining forms attested in the Oxford English Dictionary between 1980 and 1997 and discusses the suitability of paradigms for the conceptualisation of analogy-based combining-form combinations. In this chapter, the focus is on the secreted type of combining forms, which involve both abbreviation and secretion, as in initial Franken- (from Frankenstein, in Frankenfood) or final -erati (from literati, in glitterati), respectively used to refer to ‘genetically modified –’ and ‘a prominent or elite group related to –’. Using a corpus-based approach, the chapter shows that secreted combining forms offer word-formation paradigms that apply to series of similar words in the lexicon and are applicable to other new words which are at the basis of English vocabulary expansion.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.p3 06 10.1075/slcs.225.p3 Section header 11 01 04 Part III. Conversion Part III. Conversion 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.07ior 06 10.1075/slcs.225.07ior 155 180 26 Chapter 12 01 04 Chapter 7. Paradigmatic aspects of deverbal noun conversion in English Chapter 7. Paradigmatic aspects of deverbal noun conversion in English 1 A01 01 JB code 590444871 Gianina Iordachioaia Iordachioaia, Gianina Gianina Iordachioaia University of Stuttgart 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/590444871 01 eng 30 00

In this paper, I seek to identify some recurrent and predictable patterns in the formation of deverbal converted nouns in English (to climb > the climb), which crucially differ from denominal conversion verbs (the bottle > to bottle) in showing only limited productivity. I will argue, however, that noun conversion exhibits regularities with respect to the morphological make-up and the semantic class of the base verbs, as well as to the noun’s interpretation in comparison to other competing suffix-based nominalizations, which I will describe as creating relatively stable derivational series within derivational paradigms (Hathout & Namer 2019).

01 01 JB code slcs.225.08sev 06 10.1075/slcs.225.08sev 181 214 34 Chapter 13 01 04 Chapter 8. Paradigms in English and Czech noun/verb conversion Chapter 8. Paradigms in English and Czech noun/verb conversion 01 04 A contrastive study of corresponding lexemes A contrastive study of corresponding lexemes 1 A01 01 JB code 360444872 Magda Ševčíková Ševčíková, Magda Magda Ševčíková Charles University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/360444872 2 A01 01 JB code 623444873 Hana Hledíková Hledíková, Hana Hana Hledíková Charles University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/623444873 01 eng 30 00

The study deals with English noun/verb conversion pairs that have both formally and semantically close counterpart pairs in Czech. The study’s aim is to examine how these nouns and verbs, linked with similar semantic relations in English and Czech, are accommodated in the two languages with different morphological structures and conversion playing a different role. The noun/verb pairs, extracted from the British National Corpus and from the SYN2000 corpus, are analysed as two-cell paradigms and examined along with selected derivatives. The data suggest that in the Czech sample, nominals are preferred over verbs in expressing the particular meanings and most verbs appear as denominal formations, often differently from their English counterparts.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.09rod 06 10.1075/slcs.225.09rod 215 248 34 Chapter 14 01 04 Chapter 9. Conversion in a paradigmatic framework of word formation Chapter 9. Conversion in a paradigmatic framework of word formation 1 A01 01 JB code 330444874 Alexandra Soares Rodrigues Soares Rodrigues, Alexandra Alexandra Soares Rodrigues ESE – Instituto Politécnico de Bragança 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/330444874 01 eng 30 00

This paper intends to present arguments that favour a paradigmatic approach to conversion, extending Bonami & Strnadová’s (2019) proposal of aligning relations within paradigmatic systems to the aligning relation criteria. The paper compares English and Portuguese conversion and syntactic nominalisations, according to the aligning relation criteria. Those criteria compare the different phenomena with affixed deverbal nouns situated in a paradigmatic level. A paradigmatic approach strengthens the concept of conversion as word formation because it enables us to observe an alignment between conversion pairs and affixation pairs, in contrast to syntactic nominalisations, which do not obey the same features of affixed deverbal nouns and are, thus, not aligned with them.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.10vil 06 10.1075/slcs.225.10vil 249 282 34 Chapter 15 01 04 Chapter 10. Complex verbs Chapter 10. Complex verbs 01 04 The interplay of suffixation, conversion, and parasynthesis in Portuguese and English The interplay of suffixation, conversion, and parasynthesis in Portuguese and English 1 A01 01 JB code 84444875 Alina Villalva Villalva, Alina Alina Villalva Universidade de Lisboa & The Word Lab 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/84444875 01 eng 30 00

Denominal and deadjectival complex verbs form a heterogenous set. They all belong to the coarse-grained class of causative verbs, but they may be obtained by different morphological processes, namely suffixation (code n codify v ; laic adj laicize v ), conversion (water n water v ; dry adj dry v ), or parasynthesis (globe n englobe v ; rich adj enrich v ). The focus of this paper is on the description and comparative analysis of the three processes, based mainly on data from European Portuguese (e.g., planificar v ‘plan’, jogar v ‘play’, esburacar v ‘make a hole’, fragilizar v ‘fragilize’, secar v ‘dry’, envelhecer v ‘grow old’) and English (e.g., codify, play, debug, fragilize, dry, enrich). The analysis will deal with each of these verb-forming processes individually and how they relate with each other.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.p4 06 10.1075/slcs.225.p4 Section header 16 01 04 Part IV. Participles Part IV. Participles 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.11fab 06 10.1075/slcs.225.11fab 285 318 34 Chapter 17 01 04 Chapter 11. Structural and lexical aspects of the morphology of English participles Chapter 11. Structural and lexical aspects of the morphology of English participles 1 A01 01 JB code 896444876 Antonio Fábregas Fábregas, Antonio Antonio Fábregas UiT-The Arctic University of Norway 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/896444876 01 eng 30 00

In this contribution, I explore the plausibility of a paradigm-free view to the analysis of different irregularities involving participles in English. I propose that making reference to paradigm-like entities is inescapable to provide a full account of the forms, but that the role of paradigms is more limited than standardly assumed in the literature. We will provide arguments in favour of the idea that most irregular participles (gone, been, written) emerge through the structurally-determined competition between stored verbal exponents. There will only be a small number of cases where it is necessary to invoke a higher-level object such as the paradigm, in the form of a diacritic (e.g., ABA cases such as come-came-come; Bauer et al. 2013).

01 01 JB code slcs.225.12pop 06 10.1075/slcs.225.12pop 319 340 22 Chapter 18 01 04 Chapter 12. English participles in the derivational paradigm Chapter 12. English participles in the derivational paradigm 1 A01 01 JB code 389444877 Gergana Popova Popova, Gergana Gergana Popova Goldsmiths, University of London 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/389444877 01 eng 30 00

This chapter surveys the different uses of the English participles and discusses their status with respect to the distinction between derivation and inflection. In the debate about whether participles are verbal or adjectival, or indeed a mix between the two, most scholars have taken the position that ability to undergo further derivation (with affixes like -ness or negative un- for instance) indicates adjectival status. The paper assumes a descriptive focus and, without aiming to take a conclusive position relative to this general debate, explores such derivation further. The patterns covered in the paper are relatively few, but productive. This leads to derivational networks with sparse membership, but generally stable formal and semantic alignment.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.p5 06 10.1075/slcs.225.p5 Section header 19 01 04 Part V. Paradigms in ELT Part V. Paradigms in ELT 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.13gra 06 10.1075/slcs.225.13gra 343 378 36 Chapter 20 01 04 Chapter 13. Derivational paradigms in ELT textbooks Chapter 13. Derivational paradigms in ELT textbooks 1 A01 01 JB code 155444878 Tomáš Gráf Gráf, Tomáš Tomáš Gráf Charles University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/155444878 2 A01 01 JB code 392444879 Kateřina Vašků Vašků, Kateřina Kateřina Vašků Charles University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/392444879 01 eng 30 00

Developing morphological awareness is an effective learning strategy which can simplify learning L2 vocabulary. The present chapter explores how far morphological-awareness activities are represented in over 100 international ELT coursebooks, 10 teacher training manuals and 17 practice books. The results show the coverage is rather low and unsystematic except in specialist manuals for vocabulary teaching and vocabulary practice books. Even in them the quality varies. Materials mostly focus on affixation and are not based on research findings. Attention should be paid to presenting teachers and teacher-trainees with more information on teaching derivational paradigms, and to introducing existing research and reliable materials which contain quality exercises and explicit information for students as well as ideas for classroom use.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.index 06 10.1075/slcs.225.index 379 382 4 Miscellaneous 21 01 04 Index Index 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.p0 06 10.1075/slcs.225.p0 Section header 22 01 04 Introduction Introduction 01 eng
01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/slcs.225 Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20220919 C 2022 John Benjamins D 2022 John Benjamins 02 WORLD 13 15 9789027211583 WORLD 09 01 JB 3 John Benjamins e-Platform 03 https://jbe-platform.com 29 https://jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027257420 21 01 00 Unqualified price 02 105.00 EUR 01 00 Unqualified price 02 88.00 GBP GB 01 00 Unqualified price 02 158.00 USD
322027508 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code SLCS 225 Hb 15 9789027211583 06 10.1075/slcs.225 13 2022026481 00 BB 08 835 gr 10 01 JB code SLCS 02 0165-7763 02 225.00 01 02 Studies in Language Companion Series Studies in Language Companion Series 01 01 Paradigms in Word Formation Theory and applications Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and applications 1 B01 01 JB code 507426049 Alba E. Ruz Ruz, Alba E. Alba E. Ruz University of Granada 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/507426049 2 B01 01 JB code 822426050 Cristina Fernández-Alcaina Fernández-Alcaina, Cristina Cristina Fernández-Alcaina Charles University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/822426050 3 B01 01 JB code 155426051 Cristina Lara-Clares Lara-Clares, Cristina Cristina Lara-Clares University of Granada 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/155426051 01 eng 11 390 03 03 vii 03 00 382 03 10 LAN009020 12 CF/2AB 24 JB code LIN.ENG English linguistics 24 JB code LIN.GERM Germanic linguistics 24 JB code LIN.MORPH Morphology 24 JB code LIN.SYNTAX Syntax 24 JB code LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 01 06 02 00 The focus of Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and applications is on the relevance of paradigms for linguistic description. 03 00 The focus of Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and applications is on the relevance of paradigms for linguistic description. Paradigmatic organization has traditionally been considered an inherent feature of inflectional morphology, but research in the last decades clearly shows the existence of paradigms in word formation, especially in affixal derivation, often at the expense of other word-formation processes. This volume seeks to address the role that paradigms may play in the description of compounding, conversion and participles. This volume should be of interest to anyone specialized in the field of English morphology and word formation. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/slcs.225.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027211583.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027211583.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/slcs.225.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/slcs.225.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/slcs.225.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/slcs.225.hb.png 01 01 JB code slcs.225.ack-p1 06 10.1075/slcs.225.ack-p1 vii viii 2 Miscellaneous 1 01 04 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.int 06 10.1075/slcs.225.int Section header 2 01 04 Introduction Introduction 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.01gae 06 10.1075/slcs.225.01gae 3 18 16 Chapter 3 01 04 Chapter 1. Dangerous liaisons Chapter 1. Dangerous liaisons 01 04 An introduction to derivational paradigms An introduction to derivational paradigms 1 A01 01 JB code 562444863 Livio Gaeta Gaeta, Livio Livio Gaeta University of Turin 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/562444863 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.p1 06 10.1075/slcs.225.p1 Section header 4 01 04 Part I. Theoretical background Part I. Theoretical background 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.02mel 06 10.1075/slcs.225.02mel 21 56 36 Chapter 5 01 04 Chapter 2. For a topology of derivational paradigms Chapter 2. For a topology of derivational paradigms 1 A01 01 JB code 265444864 Chiara Melloni Melloni, Chiara Chiara Melloni University of Verona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/265444864 2 A01 01 JB code 538444865 Serena Dal Maso Dal Maso, Serena Serena Dal Maso University of Verona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/538444865 01 eng 30 00

In recent times, paradigmatic approaches to word formation have become increasingly popular, but the very concept of derivational paradigm is still far from being clear and universally accepted: while paradigms are a useful construct for the treatment of inflectional phenomena, less straightforward is their adoption in the realm of derivation, which is characterized by numerous gaps and inconsistencies. The aim of our theoretical contribution is to discuss the representation that morphological entities and derivational relationships receive in paradigmatic approaches, especially those which are gaining popularity in recent developments of the research. Specifically, we will reflect on how word-internal and word-external morphological relationships are explained and modeled in different topological representations, starting from traditional organizations of cells in columns, to three-dimensional arrangements of morphological families, to schematic representations along the lines of the Construction Morphology framework and, finally, to Bybee’s multidimensional networks.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.p2 06 10.1075/slcs.225.p2 Section header 6 01 04 Part II. Compounding Part II. Compounding 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.03bau 06 10.1075/slcs.225.03bau 59 68 10 Chapter 7 01 04 Chapter 3. Interlocking paradigms in English compounds Chapter 3. Interlocking paradigms in English compounds 1 A01 01 JB code 354444866 Laurie Bauer Bauer, Laurie Laurie Bauer Victoria University of Wellington 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/354444866 01 eng 30 00

In this contribution, I consider the paradigmatic structure of compounds in English, showing that the various paradigms overlap and interlock, leading to a network of paradigmatic structures. I briefly consider the implications of such a structure for non-compound structures as well, and discuss how to deal with the productivity of paradigmatic structures in such a framework.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.04bag 06 10.1075/slcs.225.04bag 69 98 30 Chapter 8 01 04 Chapter 4. Fact-checking on compound verbs in English Chapter 4. Fact-checking on compound verbs in English 1 A01 01 JB code 905444867 Alexandra Bagasheva Bagasheva, Alexandra Alexandra Bagasheva Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/905444867 2 A01 01 JB code 175444868 Jesús Fernández-Domínguez Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús Jesús Fernández-Domínguez University of Granada 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/175444868 01 eng 30 00

The creation of compound verbs remains among the most contested phenomena of English word formation and the studies targeting these units have normally portrayed them as inconsistent or almost anomalous. This perception, together with the heterogeneous origins and the contested status of compound verbs, might explain why two central questions remain unanswered: (i) are these genuine compounds? and (ii) how can they be analyzed in a uniform manner? This paper tackles English verbal compounding with two hypotheses in mind: (i) that it is crucial to differentiate between a product- and a process-oriented approach to the phenomenon, and (ii) that a paradigm-based analysis acknowledging the role of analogy and the weight of metonymy proves highly beneficial.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.05cet 06 10.1075/slcs.225.05cet 99 128 30 Chapter 9 01 04 Chapter 5. Paradigm families in compounding Chapter 5. Paradigm families in compounding 01 04 The case of English compound nouns headed by -er deverbal nouns The case of English compound nouns headed by - er deverbal nouns 1 A01 01 JB code 942444869 Bozena Cetnarowska Cetnarowska, Bozena Bozena Cetnarowska University of Silesia in Katowice 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/942444869 01 eng 30 00

This chapter demonstrates the applicability of the notion of derivational paradigms and word-formation families to the study of compounds. Three families of English compounds are investigated which are headed by deverbal -er nominals. The semantic homogeneity of each of those compound families is assessed by analysing data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), supplemented by some lexicographic searches and web searches. This involves the examination of the polysemy of the head nouns, the implicit semantic relation between compound elements and the transparency (or opacity) of the compounds which belong to the selected compound families. Comments are provided on the use of construction schemas to generalize over the internal structure and semantic interpretation of compound families (or subfamilies).

01 01 JB code slcs.225.06mat 06 10.1075/slcs.225.06mat 129 152 24 Chapter 10 01 04 Chapter 6. Derivational paradigms Chapter 6. Derivational paradigms 01 04 The case of English combining forms The case of English combining forms 1 A01 01 JB code 659444870 Elisa Mattiello Mattiello, Elisa Elisa Mattiello University of Pisa 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/659444870 01 eng 30 00

This chapter investigates a set of ten English combining forms attested in the Oxford English Dictionary between 1980 and 1997 and discusses the suitability of paradigms for the conceptualisation of analogy-based combining-form combinations. In this chapter, the focus is on the secreted type of combining forms, which involve both abbreviation and secretion, as in initial Franken- (from Frankenstein, in Frankenfood) or final -erati (from literati, in glitterati), respectively used to refer to ‘genetically modified –’ and ‘a prominent or elite group related to –’. Using a corpus-based approach, the chapter shows that secreted combining forms offer word-formation paradigms that apply to series of similar words in the lexicon and are applicable to other new words which are at the basis of English vocabulary expansion.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.p3 06 10.1075/slcs.225.p3 Section header 11 01 04 Part III. Conversion Part III. Conversion 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.07ior 06 10.1075/slcs.225.07ior 155 180 26 Chapter 12 01 04 Chapter 7. Paradigmatic aspects of deverbal noun conversion in English Chapter 7. Paradigmatic aspects of deverbal noun conversion in English 1 A01 01 JB code 590444871 Gianina Iordachioaia Iordachioaia, Gianina Gianina Iordachioaia University of Stuttgart 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/590444871 01 eng 30 00

In this paper, I seek to identify some recurrent and predictable patterns in the formation of deverbal converted nouns in English (to climb > the climb), which crucially differ from denominal conversion verbs (the bottle > to bottle) in showing only limited productivity. I will argue, however, that noun conversion exhibits regularities with respect to the morphological make-up and the semantic class of the base verbs, as well as to the noun’s interpretation in comparison to other competing suffix-based nominalizations, which I will describe as creating relatively stable derivational series within derivational paradigms (Hathout & Namer 2019).

01 01 JB code slcs.225.08sev 06 10.1075/slcs.225.08sev 181 214 34 Chapter 13 01 04 Chapter 8. Paradigms in English and Czech noun/verb conversion Chapter 8. Paradigms in English and Czech noun/verb conversion 01 04 A contrastive study of corresponding lexemes A contrastive study of corresponding lexemes 1 A01 01 JB code 360444872 Magda Ševčíková Ševčíková, Magda Magda Ševčíková Charles University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/360444872 2 A01 01 JB code 623444873 Hana Hledíková Hledíková, Hana Hana Hledíková Charles University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/623444873 01 eng 30 00

The study deals with English noun/verb conversion pairs that have both formally and semantically close counterpart pairs in Czech. The study’s aim is to examine how these nouns and verbs, linked with similar semantic relations in English and Czech, are accommodated in the two languages with different morphological structures and conversion playing a different role. The noun/verb pairs, extracted from the British National Corpus and from the SYN2000 corpus, are analysed as two-cell paradigms and examined along with selected derivatives. The data suggest that in the Czech sample, nominals are preferred over verbs in expressing the particular meanings and most verbs appear as denominal formations, often differently from their English counterparts.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.09rod 06 10.1075/slcs.225.09rod 215 248 34 Chapter 14 01 04 Chapter 9. Conversion in a paradigmatic framework of word formation Chapter 9. Conversion in a paradigmatic framework of word formation 1 A01 01 JB code 330444874 Alexandra Soares Rodrigues Soares Rodrigues, Alexandra Alexandra Soares Rodrigues ESE – Instituto Politécnico de Bragança 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/330444874 01 eng 30 00

This paper intends to present arguments that favour a paradigmatic approach to conversion, extending Bonami & Strnadová’s (2019) proposal of aligning relations within paradigmatic systems to the aligning relation criteria. The paper compares English and Portuguese conversion and syntactic nominalisations, according to the aligning relation criteria. Those criteria compare the different phenomena with affixed deverbal nouns situated in a paradigmatic level. A paradigmatic approach strengthens the concept of conversion as word formation because it enables us to observe an alignment between conversion pairs and affixation pairs, in contrast to syntactic nominalisations, which do not obey the same features of affixed deverbal nouns and are, thus, not aligned with them.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.10vil 06 10.1075/slcs.225.10vil 249 282 34 Chapter 15 01 04 Chapter 10. Complex verbs Chapter 10. Complex verbs 01 04 The interplay of suffixation, conversion, and parasynthesis in Portuguese and English The interplay of suffixation, conversion, and parasynthesis in Portuguese and English 1 A01 01 JB code 84444875 Alina Villalva Villalva, Alina Alina Villalva Universidade de Lisboa & The Word Lab 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/84444875 01 eng 30 00

Denominal and deadjectival complex verbs form a heterogenous set. They all belong to the coarse-grained class of causative verbs, but they may be obtained by different morphological processes, namely suffixation (code n codify v ; laic adj laicize v ), conversion (water n water v ; dry adj dry v ), or parasynthesis (globe n englobe v ; rich adj enrich v ). The focus of this paper is on the description and comparative analysis of the three processes, based mainly on data from European Portuguese (e.g., planificar v ‘plan’, jogar v ‘play’, esburacar v ‘make a hole’, fragilizar v ‘fragilize’, secar v ‘dry’, envelhecer v ‘grow old’) and English (e.g., codify, play, debug, fragilize, dry, enrich). The analysis will deal with each of these verb-forming processes individually and how they relate with each other.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.p4 06 10.1075/slcs.225.p4 Section header 16 01 04 Part IV. Participles Part IV. Participles 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.11fab 06 10.1075/slcs.225.11fab 285 318 34 Chapter 17 01 04 Chapter 11. Structural and lexical aspects of the morphology of English participles Chapter 11. Structural and lexical aspects of the morphology of English participles 1 A01 01 JB code 896444876 Antonio Fábregas Fábregas, Antonio Antonio Fábregas UiT-The Arctic University of Norway 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/896444876 01 eng 30 00

In this contribution, I explore the plausibility of a paradigm-free view to the analysis of different irregularities involving participles in English. I propose that making reference to paradigm-like entities is inescapable to provide a full account of the forms, but that the role of paradigms is more limited than standardly assumed in the literature. We will provide arguments in favour of the idea that most irregular participles (gone, been, written) emerge through the structurally-determined competition between stored verbal exponents. There will only be a small number of cases where it is necessary to invoke a higher-level object such as the paradigm, in the form of a diacritic (e.g., ABA cases such as come-came-come; Bauer et al. 2013).

01 01 JB code slcs.225.12pop 06 10.1075/slcs.225.12pop 319 340 22 Chapter 18 01 04 Chapter 12. English participles in the derivational paradigm Chapter 12. English participles in the derivational paradigm 1 A01 01 JB code 389444877 Gergana Popova Popova, Gergana Gergana Popova Goldsmiths, University of London 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/389444877 01 eng 30 00

This chapter surveys the different uses of the English participles and discusses their status with respect to the distinction between derivation and inflection. In the debate about whether participles are verbal or adjectival, or indeed a mix between the two, most scholars have taken the position that ability to undergo further derivation (with affixes like -ness or negative un- for instance) indicates adjectival status. The paper assumes a descriptive focus and, without aiming to take a conclusive position relative to this general debate, explores such derivation further. The patterns covered in the paper are relatively few, but productive. This leads to derivational networks with sparse membership, but generally stable formal and semantic alignment.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.p5 06 10.1075/slcs.225.p5 Section header 19 01 04 Part V. Paradigms in ELT Part V. Paradigms in ELT 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.13gra 06 10.1075/slcs.225.13gra 343 378 36 Chapter 20 01 04 Chapter 13. Derivational paradigms in ELT textbooks Chapter 13. Derivational paradigms in ELT textbooks 1 A01 01 JB code 155444878 Tomáš Gráf Gráf, Tomáš Tomáš Gráf Charles University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/155444878 2 A01 01 JB code 392444879 Kateřina Vašků Vašků, Kateřina Kateřina Vašků Charles University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/392444879 01 eng 30 00

Developing morphological awareness is an effective learning strategy which can simplify learning L2 vocabulary. The present chapter explores how far morphological-awareness activities are represented in over 100 international ELT coursebooks, 10 teacher training manuals and 17 practice books. The results show the coverage is rather low and unsystematic except in specialist manuals for vocabulary teaching and vocabulary practice books. Even in them the quality varies. Materials mostly focus on affixation and are not based on research findings. Attention should be paid to presenting teachers and teacher-trainees with more information on teaching derivational paradigms, and to introducing existing research and reliable materials which contain quality exercises and explicit information for students as well as ideas for classroom use.

01 01 JB code slcs.225.index 06 10.1075/slcs.225.index 379 382 4 Miscellaneous 21 01 04 Index Index 01 eng 01 01 JB code slcs.225.p0 06 10.1075/slcs.225.p0 Section header 22 01 04 Introduction Introduction 01 eng
01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/slcs.225 Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20220919 C 2022 John Benjamins D 2022 John Benjamins 02 WORLD WORLD US CA MX 09 01 JB 1 John Benjamins Publishing Company +31 20 6304747 +31 20 6739773 bookorder@benjamins.nl 01 https://benjamins.com 21 41 10 01 00 Unqualified price 02 JB 1 02 105.00 EUR 02 00 Unqualified price 02 88.00 01 Z 0 GBP GB US CA MX 01 01 JB 2 John Benjamins Publishing Company +1 800 562-5666 +1 703 661-1501 benjamins@presswarehouse.com 01 https://benjamins.com 21 41 10 01 00 Unqualified price 02 JB 1 02 158.00 USD