Cover not available
Part of
On Spoken French: An Ashby Reader
William J. Ashby
[Studies in Language Companion Series 226] 2023
► pp. 451–474

Variable liaison in the Spoken French of Tours: A real-time analysis

Conference paper presented at Association for French Language Studies. L’Université de Tours. Tours, France. September 25, 2003

 | University of California, Santa Barbara
 | University of Louisville
Published online: 2 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.226.c33
References (49)
References
Ågren, John. 1973. Étude sur quelques liaisons facultatives dans le français de conversation radiophonique: Fréquence et facteurs. Studia Romanica Upsaliensia, 10. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nigel. 2001. Social and Stylistic Variation in Spoken French: A Comparative Approach [Impact: Studies in Language and Society 8]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, William J. 1981. French liaison as a sociolinguistic phenomenon. In Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages 9, William W. Cressey & Donna Jo Napoli. (eds), 46–57. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2003. La liaison variable en français parlé tourangeau: Une analyse en temps réel. Conference paper presented at Association for French Language Studies. L’Université de Tours. Tours, France. September 25, 2003.
Bybee, Joan L. 2001. Frequency effects on French liaison. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45], Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper. (eds), 337–359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1947. La liaison en français: tendances et classifications. The French Review 21: 148–157.Google Scholar
. 1955. Les facteurs de la liaison facultative en français. The French Review 29: 42–49.Google Scholar
Encrevé, Pierre. 1988. Liaison avec et sans enchaînement: Phonologie tridimensionnelle et usage du français. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Labov, Willliam. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, Alan. 1996. A Diachronic Study of French Variable Liaison. MLitt dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
. 1998. French variable liaison: A proposed simplification. Francophonie, 17: 11–14.Google Scholar
Editor’s references
Armstrong, Nigel. 2001. Social and Stylistic Variation in Spoken French: A Comparative Approach [Impact: Studies in Language and Society 8]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, William J. 1977a. Clitic Inflection: An Historical Perspective. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1981a. The loss of the negative particle ne in French: A syntactic change in progress. Language 57: 674–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981b. French liaison as a sociolinguistic phenomenon. In Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages 9, William W. Cressey & Donna Jo Napoli. (eds), 46–57. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2001. Un nouveau regard sur la chute du ne en français parlé tourangeau: S’agit-il d’un changement en cours? Journal of French Language Studies 11: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. La liaison variable en français parlé tourangeau: Une analyse en temps réel. Conference paper presented at Association for French Language Studies. L’Université de Tours. Tours, France. September 25, 2003.
This volume. A new look at ‘ne’ loss in the Spoken French of Tours: A case of change in progress? [Translated by Bonnie B. Fonseca-Greber], pp. 419–446. DOI logo
Auger, Julie. 1993. More evidence for verbal agreement marking in colloquial French. In Linguistic Perspectives on the Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 103], William J. Ashby, Marianne Mithun, Giorgio Perissinotto & Eduardo Raposo. (eds), 177–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auger, J. 1994. Pronominal Clitics in Quebec Colloquial French: A Morphological Analysis. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Barnes, Betsy Kerr. 1988. Left Detachment in Spoken Standard French [Pragmatics & Beyond VI:3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Batchevanova, M. & van Gelderen, E. 2016. The interaction between the French subject and object cycles. In Cyclical Change Continued [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 227], Elly van Gelderen. (ed.), Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coveney, Aidan. 1996. Variability in Spoken French: A Sociolinguistic Study of Interrogation and Negation. Exeter: Elm Bank.Google Scholar
Culbertson, Jennifer. 2010. Convergent evidence for categorial change in French: From subject clitic to agreement marker. Language 86(1): 85–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dansereau, Diane M. 2006. Savoir dire: Cours de phonétique et de prononciation, 2nd edn. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin/Cengage.Google Scholar
Dubois, Jean & Dubois-Charlier, Françoise. 1970. Éléments de linguistique française: Syntaxe. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Dugua, Céline & Baude, Olivier. 2017. La liaison à Orléans, corpus et changement linguistique: Une première étude exploratoire. Journal of French Language Studies 27(1): 41–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enquêtes sociolinguistiques à Orléans (ESLO 1 and ESLO 2). <[URL]> (9 April 2021).
Fagyal, Zsuzsanna, Kibbee, Douglas & Jenkins, Fred. 2006. French: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnibeth Beale. 2000. The Change from Pronoun to Clitic to Prefix and the Rise of Null Subjects in Spoken Swiss French. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnie. 2011. The norm, diglossia, and linguistic identity formation: The case of French. Presentation at Forging Linguistic Identities, Towson University, Towson, MD, 17 March 17.Google Scholar
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnie & Waugh, Linda R. 2003a. On the radical difference between the subject personal pronouns in written and spoken European French. In Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use [Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 46], Pepi Leistyna & Charles F. Meyer (eds), 225–240. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2003b. The subject clitics of Conversational European French: Morphologization, grammatical change, semantic change, and change in progress. In A Romance Perspective on Linguistic Knowledge and Use [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 238], Rafael Núñez-Cedeño, Luis López & Richard Cameron. (eds), 99–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuβ, Eric. 2005. The Rise of Agreement: A Formal Approach to the Syntax and Grammaticalization of Verbal Inflection [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 81]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2011. The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Martin. 1978. The Evolution of French Syntax: A Comparative Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
King, R., Martineau, F. & Mougeon, R. 2011. The interplay of internal and external factors in grammatical change: First-person plural pronouns in French. Language 87(3): 470–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. (ed.). 1999. The Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. 1981. Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-Standard French [Pragmatics & Beyond II:6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lodge, R. A. 1993. French: From Dialect to Standard. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martineau, Françoise & Mougeon, Raymond. 2003. A sociolinguistic study of the origins of ne deletion in European and Quebec French. Language 79: 118–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palasis, Katerina. 2013. The case for diglossia: Describing the emergence of two grammars in the early acquisition of metropolitan French. Journal of French Language Studies 23: 17–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberge, Y. 1990. The syntactic recoverability of null arguments. Montreal: McGill University Press.Google Scholar
Rowlett, Paul. 2013. Do French speakers really have two grammars? Journal of French Language Studies 23(1): 37–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stark, Elisabeth, Meisner, Charlotte & Völker, Harald. (eds). 2014. Negation and Clitics in French: Interaction and Variation. Special issue of Journal of French Language Studies 24(1).Google Scholar
Vendryes, Jospeph. 1914/1968. Le langage: Introduction linguisitique à l’histoire. Paris: La renaissance du livre.Google Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 2011. Pour un modèle diglossique de description du français: quelques implications théoriques, didactiques et méthodologiques. Journal of French Language Studies 21(1): 231–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar