Review published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 16:1 (2013) ► pp.9196
References (11)
References
Baker, Charlotte & Carol Padden. 1978. Focusing on the nonmanual components of ASL. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 27–57. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baker-Shenk, Charlotte. 1983. A micro-analysis of the nonmanual components of American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, Penny. 1999. Rhythmic temporal patterns in the signing of deaf early and late leaners of Swiss German Sign Language. Language and Speech 421. 177–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane. 1998. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coerts, Jane. 1992. Nonmanual grammatical markers: An analysis of interrogatives, negations and topicalisations in Sign Language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Fenlon, Jordan. 2010. Seeing sentence boundaries: The production and perception of visual markers signaling boundaries in signed languages. PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Wendy Sandler. 1999. Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech 421. 143–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 2005. Prosodic constituency and intonation in a sign language. In Helen Leuninger & Daniela Happ (eds.), Gebärdensprachen: Struktur, Erwerb, Verwendung (Linguistische Berichte Special Issue 15), 59–86. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1999. A functional journey with a formal ending. What do brow raises do in American Sign Language? In Michael Darnell, Edith A. Moravcsik, Michael Noonan, Frederick J. Newmeyer & Kathleen M. Wheatly (eds.), Functionalism and formalism in linguistics, vol. 2: Case studies, 295–313. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winston, Elisabeth & Christine Monikowski. 2003. Marking topic boundaries in signed interpretation and transliteration. In Melanie Metzger, Steven Collins, Valerie Dively & Risa Shaw (eds.), From topic boundaries to omission: New research on interpretation, 187–228. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Crezee, Ineke H.M., Johanna Hautekiet & Lidia Rura
Crezee, Ineke H.M., Nawar Gailani & Anna N. Gailani
Crezee, Ineke H.M., Holly Mikkelson & Laura Monzon-Storey

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.