Article published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 27:2 (2024) ► pp.209239
References (42)
References
Anand, Pranav & Andrew Nevins. 2004. Shifty operators in changing contexts. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XIV1. 20–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aristodemo, Valentina, Beatrice Giustolisi, Giorgia Zorzi, Doriane Gras, Charlotte Hauser, Rita Sala, Jordina Sánchez Amat, Caterina Donati & Carlo Cecchetto. 2022. On the nature of role shift: Insights from a comprehension study in different populations of LIS, LSC and LSF signers. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 411. 459–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, T. Daniel Seely, Robert C. Berwick, Sandiway Fong, M. A. C. Huybregts, Hisatsugu Kitahara, Andrew McInnerney & Yushi Sugimoto. 2023. Merge and the Strong Minimalist Thesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Published online: DOI logo. Accessed on November 25, 2023].
Davidson, Donald. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In Donald Davidson. 2001. Essays on actions and events (2nd edition), 105–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Kathryn. 2015. Quotation, demonstration, and iconicity. Linguistics and Philosophy 38(6). 477–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deal, Amy Rose. 2020. Theory of indexical shift. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1995. Point of view expressed through shifters. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 133–154. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2015. Perspective in signed discourse: The privileged status of the signer’s locus and gaze. Open Linguistics 2015(1). 411–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka. 1992. On the semantics of subjunctive complements. In Paul Hirschbühler & Konrad Koerner (eds.), Romance languages and modern linguistic theory, 69–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gan, Linghui Eva. 2021. Shifted indexicals in Hong Kong Sign Language with(-out) role shift. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign Language Theory (FEAST) 51. 74–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Annika & Markus Steinbach. 2012. Quotation in sign languages: A visible context shift. In Isabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid van Alphen (eds.), Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives, 203–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16(4). 547–593.Google Scholar
. 2000. On events in linguistic semantics. In James Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi & Achille C. Varzi (eds.), Speaking of events, 49–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ichida, Yasuhiro. 2005. Shuwa-no gengogaku 7. Hanashite-no shintai-to shisen. (Linguistics of sign language 7. The signer’s body and gaze). Gekkan Gengo 34(7). 92–99.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1979. Attitudes de dicto and de se . The Philosophical Review 88(4). 513–543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1995. The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 155–170. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2012. Utterance reports and constructed action. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 365–387. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Ronice Müller de Quadros. 2011. Acquisition of syntax-discourse interface: The expression of point of view. Lingua 1211. 623–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandel, Mark. 1977. Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In Lynn A. Friedman (ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language, 57–107. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Maier, Emar. 2018. Quotation, demonstration, and attraction in sign language role shift. Theoretical Linguistics 44(3–4). 265–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meier, Richard P. 1990. Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, Volume 1: Linguistics, 175–190. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll. 2012. Tense, aspect, and modality. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 186–204. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poulin, Christine & Christopher Miller. 1995. On narrative discourse and point of view in Quebec Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 117–131. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pyers, Jennie E. & Ann Senghas. 2007. Reported action in Nicaraguan and American Sign Languages: Emerging versus established systems. In Pamela M. Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure, 279–302. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quer, Josep. 2005. Context shift and indexical variables in sign languages. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XV1. 152–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Reporting and quoting in signed discourse. In Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Understanding quotation, 277–302. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. On categorizing types of role shift in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics 441. 277–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quer, Josep, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.) 2017. SignGram blueprint: A guide to sign language grammar writing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton (open access at [URL]). DOI logo
Ross, John Robert. 1970. On declarative sentences. In Roderic A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 222–277. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2003. A plea for monsters. Linguistics & Philosophy 261. 29–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Super monsters I: Attitude and action role shift in sign language. Semantics and Pragmatics 101 (Article 9).Google Scholar
Sells, Peter. 1987. Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18(3). 445–479.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret. 2004. Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 1141. 255–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speas, Margaret & Carol Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar: Volume 1: Syntax and semantics, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1999. Context and content. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinbach, Markus. 2021. Role shift: Theoretical perspectives. In Josep Quer, Roland Pfau & Annika Herrmann (eds.), The Routledge handbook of theoretical and experimental sign language research, 351–377. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sudo, Yasutada. 2012. On the semantics of phi features on pronouns. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.
Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Bencie Woll. 1999. The linguistics of British Sign Language: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen. 2010. What ‘you’ and ‘I’ mean to each other: Person indexicals, self-ascription, and theory of mind. Language 86(2). 332–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zucchi, Sandro. 2004. Monsters in the visual mode? Manuscript, Università degli Studi di Milano.Google Scholar
video

Video - Example 1