Article published in:
Requesting in Social Interaction
Edited by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 26] 2014
► pp. 87114


Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E.
2002“Sequence and Solidarity.” In Group Cohesion, Trust and Solidarity, Vol. 19, ed. by Shane R. Thye, and Edward J. Lawler, 229–253. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2014“What Does Grammar Tell Us About Action?” Pragmatics 24 (3): 623–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci S.
2006“Offers of Assistance: Constraints on Syntactic Design.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (8): 1257–1280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
1984“Speakers’ Reportings in Invitation Sequences.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 129–151. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1976“Is Sybil There? The Structure of Some American English Directives.” Language in Society 5 (1): 22–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1982“Structures of Control.” In Communicating in the Classroom, ed. by L.C. Wilkinson, 27–47. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1955“On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes 18: 213–231.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2012“Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29. Crossref.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
2005“The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
2012“Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in ‘Repetitive’ Responses to Polar Questions.” In Questions, ed. by Jan Peter de Ruiter, 179–192Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Language and Social Interaction Archive
2014 Available from San Francisco State University. http://​www​.sfsu​.edu​/~lsi/
Lerner, Gene H.
1996“Finding ‘Face’ in the Preference Structures of Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 59 (4): 303–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna
2005 “Language as Social Action: A Study of How Senior Citizens Request Assistance with Practical Tasks in the Swedish Home Help Service.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen and Margret Selting, 209–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D., and Galina B. Bolden
2010“Preference Organization of Sequence-Initiating Actions: The Case of Explicit Account Solicitations.” Discourse Studies 12 (4): 501–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992aLectures on Conversation, Vol. 1. 2 vols. ed. by Gail Jefferson. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
1992bLectures on Conversation, Vol. 2. 2 vols. ed. by Gail Jefferson. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1979“Identification and Recognition in Telephone Conversation Openings.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 23–78. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
1984 “On Some Questions and Ambiguities in Conversation.” In Structures of Social Action, J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 266–298. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks
1973“Opening Up Closings.” Semiotica 8 (4): 289–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1976“A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5 (1): 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2008Origins of Human Communication. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Baranova, Julija & Mark Dingemanse
2016. Reasons for requests. Discourse Studies 18:6  pp. 641 ff. Crossref logo
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2014. What does grammar tell us about action?. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 24:3  pp. 623 ff. Crossref logo
Fox, Barbara & Trine Heinemann
2019. Telescoping responses to requests: Unpacking progressivity. Discourse Studies 21:1  pp. 38 ff. Crossref logo
Gagne, Christophe
2018. Indirectness and entitlement in product requests in British service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics 133  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Holmes, Edward J. B., Merran Toerien & Clare Jackson
2017. The Interactional Bind of “Just [Do X]”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50:4  pp. 419 ff. Crossref logo
Humă, Bogdana, Elizabeth Stokoe & Rein Ove Sikveland
2019. Persuasive Conduct: Alignment and Resistance in Prospecting “Cold” Calls. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38:1  pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Jansson, Gunilla, Charlotta Plejert & Camilla Lindholm
2019. The social organization of assistance in multilingual interaction in Swedish residential care. Discourse Studies 21:1  pp. 67 ff. Crossref logo
Kendrick, Kobin H. & Paul Drew
2016. Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Raymond, Geoffrey & Don H Zimmerman
2016. Closing matters: Alignment and misalignment in sequence and call closings in institutional interaction. Discourse Studies 18:6  pp. 716 ff. Crossref logo
Rudneva, Ekaterina
2019. How Russians pre-request and seek assistance: a study of interaction in two communities of practice. Russian Linguistics 43:2  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.