Flat as a wall or flat as a butcher’s hand
The poetic simile and second-order semantic foregrounding
Foregrounding theory deals with the relation between deviant textual device (e.g., alliteration) and the effect on
readers (e.g., high aesthetic evaluation). While previous research has tended to look at an array of devices together in longer
stretches of text, we focus on an isolated, semantic foregrounding device, the closed simile. We introduce a distinction between
the standard and non-standard simile, representing first- and second-order foregrounding, respectively, and test the idea that the
more deviant version would yield higher ratings in terms of the aesthetic, cognitive, and emotive dimensions of text appreciation.
Our first finding is that experts prefer the more foregrounded version whereas novices opt for the less foregrounded one. However,
our second finding is that, when the novices are prompted to interpret the similes prior to rating them, the non-standard version
yields higher ratings. We conclude by discussing some implications of the present research for foregrounding theory.
Article outline
- The simile as a foregrounding device
- Experiment 1: Novice ratings
- Participants
- Materials
- Procedure
- Results and discussion
- Experiment 2: Expert ratings
- Participants
- Materials and procedure
- Results and discussion
- Experiment 3: Novice ratings after interpretation task
- Participants
- Materials and procedure
- Results and discussion
- General discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Bambini, V., Canal, P., Resta, D., & Grimaldi, M.
(
2018)
Time course and neurophysiological underpinnings of metaphor in literary context.
Discourse Processes.
Beardsley, M.
(
1958)
Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of criticism. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Brogan, J. V.
(
1994) “
Simile” entry. In
T. V. F. Brogan (Ed.),
The new Princeton handbook of poetic terms (pp. 271–73). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L. C., & Leung, A.
(
1993)
Literary processing and interpretation: Towards empirical foundations.
Poetics, 221, 5–33.
Fishelov, D.
(
1993)
Poetic and non-poetic simile: Structure, semantics, rhetoric.
Poetics Today, 14(1), 1–23.
Fishelov, D.
(
2007)
Shall I compare thee? Simile understanding and semantic categories.
Journal of Literary Semantics, 36(1), 70–87.
Hakemulder, J.
(
2004)
Foregrounding and its effect on readers’ perception.
Discourse Processes, 38(2), 193–218.
Harash, A., & Shen, Y.
(
2016)
Reading as an obstacle race: Processing difficulty, semantic noise and the aesthetic experience.
Versus, 45(1), 71–92.
Harmon, W., & Homan, C. H.
(
2000)
“Simile” definition.
A handbook to literature (8th ed.) (p. 483). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D.
(
1994)
Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories.
Poetics, 221, 389–407.
Mukařovský, J.
(
1970)
Standard language and poetic language. In
D. C. Freeman (Ed.),
Linguistics and literary style (pp. 40–56). New York, NY: Holt.
Ortony, A., Vondruska, R., Foss, M., & Jones, L.
(
1985)
Salience, similes and the asymmetry of similarity.
Journal of Memory and Language, 241, 569–594.
Peskin, J.
(
1998)
Constructing meaning when reading poetry: An expert-novice study.
Cognition and Instruction, 16(3), 235–63.
Semino, E., & Steen, G.
(
2008)
Metaphor in literature. In
R. W. Gibbs (Ed.),
The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 232–246). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Sexton, A.
(
1999)
The complete poems of Anne Sexton. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Shen, Y.
(
1995)
Cognitive constraints on directionality in the semantic structure of poetic vs. non-poetic metaphors.
Poetics, 231, 255–74.
Shklovsky, V.
(
1965)
Art as technique. In
L. T. Lemon &
M. J. Reis (Eds.),
Russian formalist criticism (pp. 3–24). Lincoln: Nebraska University Press.
Steen, G.
(
1994)
Understanding metaphor in literature: An empirical approach. London, United Kingdom: Longman.
Tartakovsky, R., & Shen, Y.
in press).
Meek as milk and large as logic: A corpus study of the non-standard poetic simile.
Language and Literature.
Van Peer, W.
(
2007)
Introduction to foregrounding: A state of the art.
Language and Literature, 16(2), 99–104.
Van Peer, W., & Hakemulder, J.
(
2006)
Foregrounding. In
K. Brown (Ed.),
The Pergamon encyclopaedia of language and linguistics (Vol. 41) (pp. 546–551). Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier.
Van Peer, W., Hakemulder, J., & Zyngier, S.
(
2007)
Lines on feeling: Foregrounding, aesthetics and meaning.
Language and Literature, 16(2), 197–213.
Wilstach, F.
(
1917)
A dictionary of similes. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Co.
Zyngier, S., Van Peer, W., & Hakemulder, J.
(
2007)
Complexity and foregrounding: In the eye of the beholder? Poetics Today, 28(4), 653–658.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Tartakovsky, Roi & Yeshayahu Shen
2019.
Meek as milk and large as logic: A corpus study of the non-standard poetic simile.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:3
► pp. 203 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.