Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 5:2 (2015) ► pp.183199
References
Blythe, H., & Sweet, C
(2008) The writing community: A new model for the creative writing classroom. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition and Culture, 81, 305–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohrn, I.C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A.M
(2013) When we like what we know - A paramertic fMRI analysis of beauty and familiarity. Brain and Language, 1241, 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broad, B., & Theune, M
(2010) How we value comtemporary poetry: An empirical inquiry. College English, 73(2), 113–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, D., & Harper, G
(2013) Introduction: Key issues and global perspectives in creative writing. In D. Donnelly & G. Harper (Eds.), Key issues in creative writing (pp. xiii–xxxi). Bristol, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gatti, A
(2011) Hume’s taste for standards: Experience and aestehtic judgment reconsidered. Castelli di Yale, XI(11), 134–143.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D.I
(2010) Poetry as research: Exploring second language poetry writing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Healey, S
(2013) Beyond the literary: Why creative literacy matters. In D. Donnelly & G. Harper (Eds.), Key issues in creative writing (pp. 61–78). Bristol, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Leahy, A
(2012) Undergraduate creative writing in the United States: Buying in isn’t selling out. In H. Beck (Ed.), Teaching creative writing (pp. 73–79). Houndmills, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, D.P., Fairchild, A.J., & Fritz, M.S
(2007) Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 581, 583–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, D., Lockwood, C.M., & Williams, J
(2004) Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resamplin methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 301, 99–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obermeier, C., Menninghaus, W., von Koppenfels, M., Raettig, T., Schmidt-Kassow, M., Otterbein, S., & Kotz, S
(2013) Aesthetic and emotional effects of meter and rhyme in poetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 41, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preacher, K., & Hayes, A.F
(2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 361, 717–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P
(2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Peer, W
(1986) Stylistics and psychology: Investiagtions of foregrounding. London, United Kingdomk: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
(2008) The quality of literature: Linguistic studies in literary evaluation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wandor, M
(2012) The creative writing workshop: A survival kit. In H. Beck (Ed.), Teaching creative writing (pp. 51–59). Houndmills, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilbers, S
(1999) The Iowa writer’s workshop. New York, NY: Hyperion.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Jacobs, Arthur M.
2017. Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11 DOI logo
Nenadić, Filip, Dušan Vejnović & Slobodan Marković
2019. Subjective experience of poetry: Latent structure and differences between experts and non-experts. Poetics 73  pp. 100 ff. DOI logo
Postarnak, Svetlana, São Luís Castro & Susana Silva
2020. The role of linguistic prosody in the responses to recited poetry. Scientific Study of Literature 10:2  pp. 228 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.