Article published in:
Transdisciplinary Approaches to Literature and Empathy
Edited by Paul Sopčák, Massimo Salgaro and J. Berenike Herrmann
[Scientific Study of Literature 6:1] 2016
► pp. 4258
References
Acheson, D. J., Wells, J. B., & MacDonald, M. C.
(2008) New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 278–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adams R. B. Jr, Rule, N. O., Franklin R. G. Jr, Wang, E., Stevenson, M. T., Yoshikawa, S., … Ambady, N.
(2010) Cross-cultural reading the mind in the eyes: an fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(1), 97–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Apperly, I. A.
(2012) What is “theory of mind”? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 825–839. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. A., Peterson, E., Pulos, S., & Kirkland, R. A.
(2014) Eyes and IQ: A meta-analysis of the relationship between intelligence and “Reading the Mind in the Eyes”. Intelligence, 44, 78–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I.
(2001) The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. E., & Barnes, J. L.
(2015a) The effects of reading material on social and non-social cognition. Poetics, 52, 32–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Black, J., & Barnes, J. L.
(2015b) Fiction and social cognition: The effect of viewing award-winning television dramas on theory of mind. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 423–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bormann, D., & Greitemeyer, T.
(2015) Immersed in virtual worlds and minds effects of in-game storytelling on immersion, need satisfaction, and affective theory of mind. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(6), 646–652. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, M. A., Target, M., Lecours, S., Fonagy, P., Tremblay, L. M., Schachter, A., & Stein, H.
(2008) Mentalization in adult attachment narratives: Reflective functioning, mental states, and affect elaboration compared. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25(1), 47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowes, A., & Katz, A.
(2015) Metaphor creates intimacy and temporarily enhances theory of mind. Memory & Cognition, 43(6), 953–963. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M. B.
(1988) A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer Jr., (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E.
(1982) The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J.
(2001) Language and characterisation: People in plays and other texts. London: Longman.Google Scholar
DeLillo, D.
(1988) Libra. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I.
(2003) The social brain: Mind, language, and society in evolutionary perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 163–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fertuck, E. A., Mergenthaler, E., Target, M., Levy, K. N., & Clarkin, J. F.
(2012) Development and criterion validity of a computerized text analysis measure of reflective functioning. Psychotherapy Research, 22(3), 298–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Field, A.
(2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L.
(1999) The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process Theories in Social Psychology (pp. 231–254). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. E.
(1990) A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1_74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P., & Target, M.
(1997) Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization. Development and Psychopathology, 9(4), 679–700. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fonagy, P., Target, M., Steele, H., & Steele, M.
(1998) Reflective-functioning manual, version 5.0, for application to Adult Attachment Interviews. London, UK: University College London.Google Scholar
Fong, K., Mullin, J. B., & Mar, R. A.
(2013) What you read matters: The role of fiction genre in predicting interpersonal sensitivity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 370–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) How exposure to literary genres relates to attitudes toward gender roles and sexual behavior. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(3), 274–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forster, E.M.
(2002) Aspects of the novel. New York: RosettaBooks. (Original work published 1927)Google Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B.
(2000) Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 708–724. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & Rapp, D. N.
(2004) Psychological processes underlying literary impact. Poetics Today, 25(2), 265–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., Kass, S., Carrey, J., Herzig, B., Feeney, R., & Sabini, J.
(2008) Transportation across media: Repeated exposure to print and film. Media Psychology, 11(4), 512–539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, J.
(2000) The moral laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A. F.
(2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. M., & Frith, C. D.
(2014) The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science, 344(6190), 1243091-1–1243091-6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirschfeld, L. A.
(2001) On a folk theory of society: Children, evolution, and mental representations of social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 107–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoppenstand, G.
(1998) Popular fiction: An anthology. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Humphrey, N.
(1984) Consciousness regained. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
(2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knox, J.
(2003) Archetype, attachment, analysis: Jungian psychology and the emergent mind. London, UK: Brunner-Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V.
(2000) Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 93–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B.
(2006) Bookworm versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with personality, ability, and achievement. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K.
(2008) The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B.
(2009) Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34(4), 407–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mascaro, J. S., Rilling, J. K., Negi, L. T., & Raison, C.
(2012) Compassion meditation enhances empathic accuracy and related neural activity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(1), 48–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maskit, B., & Murphy, S.
(2014) The Discourse Attributes Analysis Program (DAAP). Retrieved September 01, 2014, from http://​www​.thereferentialprocess​.org​/the​-discourseattributes​-analysis​-program​-daap
Mergenthaler, E., & Bucci, W.
(1999) Linking verbal and non-verbal representations: Computer analysis of referential activity. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 72(3), 339–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D.
(1999) What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 28(2), 121–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R., & Phillips, L.
(2015) The overlapping relationship between emotion perception and theory of mind. Neuropsychologia, 70, 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neuberg, S. L., & Fiske, S. T.
(1987) Motivational influences on impression formation: outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pennebaker, J.W., Booth, R.J., Boyd, R.L., & Francis, M.E.
(2015) Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2015. Austin, TX: Pennebaker Conglomerates (www​.LIWC​.net).
Schurz, M., & Perner, J.
(2015) An evaluation of neurocognitive models of theory of mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singer, T.
(2006) The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 855–863. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slade, A.
(2005) Parental reflective functioning: An introduction. Attachment & Human Development, 7(3), 269–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamir, D., Bricker, A., Dodell-Feder, D., & Mitchell, J.
(2016) Reading fiction and reading minds: The role of simulation in the default network. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 215–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vellante, M., Baron-Cohen, S., Melis, M., Marrone, M., Petretto, D. R., Masala, C., & Preti, A.
(2013) The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test: Systematic review of psychometric properties and a validation study in Italy. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 18(4), 326–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, M. E., & Fiske, S. T.
(2005) Controlling racial prejudice social-cognitive goals affect amygdala and stereotype activation. Psychological Science, 16(1), 56–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiessner, P. W.
(2014) Embers of society: Firelight talk among the Ju/’hoansi Bushmen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(39), 14027–14035. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Young, S. G., Hugenberg, K., Bernstein, M. J., & Sacco, D. F.
(2012) Perception and motivation in face recognition: A critical review of theories of the cross-race effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 116–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zunshine, L.
(2015) From the social to the literary: Approaching Cao Xueqin’s The Story of the Stone from a cognitive perspective. In L. Zunshine (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive literary studies (176–196). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Bracher, Mark, Deborah Barnbaum, Michael Byron, Tammy Clewell, Nancy Docherty, Françoise Massardier-Kenney, David Pereplyotchik, Susan Roxburgh & Elizabeth Smith-Pryor
2019. Compassion-Cultivating Pedagogy. Scientific Study of Literature 9:2  pp. 107 ff. Crossref logo
Carpenter, Jordan M.A., Melanie C. Green & Kaitlin S. Fitzgerald
2018. Mind-reading motivation. Scientific Study of Literature 8:2  pp. 211 ff. Crossref logo
Castano, Emanuele, Alison Jane Martingano, Pietro Perconti & Burcu Arslan
2020. The effect of exposure to fiction on attributional complexity, egocentric bias and accuracy in social perception. PLOS ONE 15:5  pp. e0233378 ff. Crossref logo
Deane, Paul, Swapna Somasundaran, René R. Lawless, Hilary Persky & Colleen Appel
2019. The Key Practice, Building and Sharing Stories and Social Understandings: The Intrinsic Value of Narrative. ETS Research Report Series 2019:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kidd, David & Emanuele Castano
2019. Reading Literary Fiction and Theory of Mind: Three Preregistered Replications and Extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychological and Personality Science 10:4  pp. 522 ff. Crossref logo
Nikolajeva, Maria
2019. What is it Like to be a Child? Childness in the Age of Neuroscience. Children's Literature in Education 50:1  pp. 23 ff. Crossref logo
Oatley, Keith & Maja Djikic
2018. Psychology of Narrative Art. Review of General Psychology 22:2  pp. 161 ff. Crossref logo
Turner, Rose & Frederic Vallee-Tourangeau
2020. Fiction effects on social cognition. Scientific Study of Literature 10:1 Crossref logo
Vaziri, H., L. Tay, M. G. Keith & J. O. Pawelski
2019. History, literature, and philosophy: A systematic review of positive functioning. The Journal of Positive Psychology 14:6  pp. 695 ff. Crossref logo
Veneziano, Edy & Ageliki Nicolopoulou
2019.  In Narrative, Literacy and Other Skills [Studies in Narrative, 25],  pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.