Cover not available
Article published In:
Translation in times of technocapitalism
Edited by Stefan Baumgarten and Jordi Cornellà-Detrell
[Target 29:2] 2017
► pp. 264–283

Technology, translation and society

A constructivist, critical theory approach

| University of Manchester

Translation studies and social theories of translation tend not to deal adequately with questions regarding the role of technology in translation and have neglected the ways in which technologies, as non-human entities, embody and materialize hegemonic and power relations. This paper seeks to address this shortcoming by looking to science and technology studies (STS) for conceptual frameworks to help us to understand and articulate (a) how popular, deterministic perceptions of translation technology are perpetuated through the discourses of hegemonic actors, (b) how decisions regarding design and use of translation technologies may be studied with reference to their construction and interpretation by relevant social groups, and (c) how a critical theory of technology and an analytical focus on practices can help to focus our attention on the exercise of hegemonic control in the translation sector.

Keywords: translation technology, science and technology studies, social construction of technology, critical theory of technology, practice theory
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Technological determinism
  • 3.Social construction of technology
  • 4.Technology and power
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 29 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.29.2.04olo
References
Adler, Paul S
2007 “The Future of Critical Management Studies: A Paleo-Marxist Critique of Labour Process Theory.” Organization Studies 28 (9): 1313–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, Stefan
2016 “The Crooked Timber of Self-reflexivity: Translation and Ideology in the End Times.” Perspectives 24 (1): 115–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bijker, Wiebe E
1995 Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Towards a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2010 “How Is Technology Made? That Is the Question!” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (1): 63–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor Pinch
eds. 1987 The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
eds. 2012 The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bijker, Wiebe E., and Trevor Pinch
2012 “Preface to the Anniversary Edition.” In Bijker, Hughes and Pinch 2012, xi–xxxiv.Google Scholar
Bräuchler, Birgit, and John Postill
eds. 2010 Theorising Media and Practice. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Chandler, Jennifer A
2012 “ ‘Obligatory Technologies’ Explaining Why People Feel Compelled to Use Certain Technologies.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 32 (4): 255–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contu, Alessia
2014 “On Boundaries and Difference: Communities of Practice and Power Relations in Creative Work.” Management Learning 45 (3): 289–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contu, Alessia, and Hugh Willmott
2006 “Studying Practice: Situating Talking About Machines.” Organization Studies 27 (12): 1769–1782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cronin, Michael
2003 Translation and Globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2013 Translation in the Digital Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dafoe, Allan
2015 “On Technological Determinism: A Typology, Scope Conditions, and a Mechanism.” Science, Technology & Human Values 40 (6): 1047–1076. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobbins, Michael
2009 Urban Design and People. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Donoghue, Patrick
2013 “Common Sense Advisory Lists Lionbridge as the #1 Language Service Provider.” Accessed June 7, 2016. [URL]
Dorrier, Jason
2016 “Will the End of Moore’s Law Halt Computing’s Exponential Rise?” Singularity HUB . Accessed March 8, 2016. [URL]
Feenberg, Andrew
1992 “Subversive Rationalization: Technology, Power, and Democracy.” Inquiry 35 (3–4): 301–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 Questioning Technology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005 “Critical Theory of Technology: An Overview.” Tailoring Biotechnologies 1 (1): 47–64.Google Scholar
Fisher, Eran
2010 “Contemporary Technology Discourse and the Legitimation of Capitalism.” European Journal of Social Theory 13 (2): 229–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio
1971 Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Edited and translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Hackett, Edward J., Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman
eds. 2008 The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna
1991 Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra
1998 Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
ed. 2011 The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David
2015 “Consolidating Power.” ROAR Magazine. Accessed September 3, 2016. [URL].Google Scholar
Herman, Andrew
1982 “Conceptualizing Control: Domination and Hegemony in the Capitalist Labor Process.” The Insurgent Sociologist 11 (3): 7–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hommels, Anique
2005 “Studying Obduracy in the City: Toward a Productive Fusion between Technology Studies and Urban Studies.” Science, Technology & Human Values 30 (3): 323–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornborg, Alf
2014 “Technology as Fetish: Marx, Latour, and the Cultural Foundations of Capitalism.” Theory, Culture & Society 31 (4): 119–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Thomas P
1983 Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, W. John
1995 “Machine Translation: A Brief History.” In Concise History of the Language Sciences: From the Sumerians to the Cognitivists, ed. by E. F. K. Koerner, and R. E. Asher, 431–445. Kidlington: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Dorothy
2011 “The Ethics of Machine Translation.” In Proceedings of the 20th NZSTI National Conference. Reflections on Language and Technology, ed. by Sybille Ferner, 121–131. Auckland: New Zealand Society of Translators and Interpreters.Google Scholar
Kenny, Dorothy, and Stephen Doherty
2014 “Statistical Machine Translation in the Translation Curriculum: Overcoming Obstacles and Empowering Translators.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 8 (2): 276–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Hans K., and Daniel Lee Kleinman
2002 “The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations.” Science, Technology & Human Values 27 (1): 28–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
1985 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Leonardi, Paul M., and Stephen R. Barley
2010 “What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing.” The Academy of Management Annals 4 (1): 1–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littau, Karin
2016 “Translation and the Materialities of Communication.” Translation Studies 9 (1): 82–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen
1990 Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven
2005 Power: A Radical View. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael
2008 “Ideas and Perspectives.” In Hackett et al. 2008, 9–11.Google Scholar
Moore, Gordon E
1975 “Progress in Digital Integrated Electronics.” IEDM Technical Digest 19751: 11–13.Google Scholar
Morozov, Evgeny
2013 To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Nicolini, Davide
2009 “Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections.” Organization Studies 30 (12): 1391–1418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Sharon
2012 “Translation as Human-Computer Interaction.” Translation Spaces 1 (1): 101–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Hagan, Minako
2016 “Massively Open Translation: Unpacking the Relationship between Technology and Translation in the 21st Century.” International Journal of Communication 101: 929–946.Google Scholar
Olohan, Maeve
2011 “Translators and Translation Technology: The Dance of Agency.” Translation Studies 4 (3): 342–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming 2017. “Knowledge and Knowing in Translation Practice.” Translation Spaces.
Orr, Julian Edgerton
1996 Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pinch, Trevor J., and Wiebe E. Bijker
1984 “The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other.” Social Studies of Science 14 (3): 399–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reckwitz, Andreas
2002 “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, William I
2012 “Global Capitalism Theory and the Emergence of Transnational Elites.” Critical Sociology 38 (3): 349–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 A Theory of Global Capitalism: Production, Class, and State in a Transnational World. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R
1996 Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “Introduction: Practice Theory.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. by Theodore, R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr-Cetina, and Eike von Savigny, 1–14. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shove, Elizabeth, Mika Pantzar, and Matt Watson
2012 The Dynamics of Social Practice. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sismondo, Sergio
2010 An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Thorpe, Charles
2008 “Political Theory in Science and Technology Studies.” In Hackett et al. 2008, 63–82.Google Scholar
van der Meer, Jaap
2016 “The Future Does Not Need Translators.” TAUS Blog. Accessed February 24, 2016. [URL]Google Scholar
Waldrop, Mitchell
2016 “The Chips Are Down for Moore’s Law.” Nature News February 9, 2016. Archive 530 (7589). [URL] DOI: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warde, Alan
2016 The Practice of Eating. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Winner, Langdon
1983 “Technologies as Forms of Life.” In Epistemology, Methodology and the Social Sciences, ed. by Robert S. Cohen, and Marx W. Wartofsky, 249–263. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Also in Winner 1986, Chapter 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986 The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2001 “Where Technological Determinism Went.” In Visions of STS: Counterpoints in Science, Technology, and Society Studies, ed. by Stephen H. Cutcliffe, and Carl Mitcham, 11–18. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Wyatt, Sally
2008 “Technological Determinism is Dead: Long Live Technological Determinism.” In Hackett et al. 2008, 165–180.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 15 other publications

Corpas Pastor, Gloria & Fernando Sánchez Rodas
2021. Chapter 1. Now what?. In Corpora in Translation and Contrastive Research in the Digital Age [Benjamins Translation Library, 158], ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
de Groote, Brecht
2023. Translation as cultural technique. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 35:2 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Dore, Margherita & Angelica Petrucci
2022. Professional and amateur AVT. The Italian dubbing, subtitling and fansubbing of The Handmaid’s Tale. Perspectives 30:5 ► pp. 876 ff. DOI logo
Jiménez-Crespo, Miguel A.
2020. The “technological turn” in translation studies. Translation Spaces 9:2 ► pp. 314 ff. DOI logo
Malmkjær, Kirsten
2022. Translation Studies fifty years on. Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 8:3 ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Morini, Massimiliano
2020. Luciano Bianciardi. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 32:1 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Nunes Vieira, Lucas & Elisa Alonso
2020. Translating perceptions and managing expectations: an analysis of management and production perspectives on machine translation. Perspectives 28:2 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Ping, Yuan
2022. Student perceptions of translation technology in a scientific and technical translation course. In Re-Thinking Translator Education [Sprachen lehren – Sprachen lernen, ], ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Rossi, Caroline
2020. Review of Bowker & Ciro (2019): Machine Translation and Global Research: Towards Improved Machine Translation Literacy in the Scholarly Community. Translation Spaces 9:2 ► pp. 342 ff. DOI logo
Sakamoto, Akiko
2022. Translation and Technology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Translation, ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Sakamoto, Akiko & Masaru Yamada
2020. Social groups in machine translationpost-editing. Translation Spaces 9:1 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Tieber, Michael
2023. Investigating Translation Concepts in Machine Translation. In Translaboration in Analogue and Digital Practice [Transkulturalität – Translation – Transfer, 57], ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Vieira, Lucas Nunes, Carol O’Sullivan, Xiaochun Zhang & Minako O’Hagan
2023. Machine translation in society: insights from UK users. Language Resources and Evaluation 57:2 ► pp. 893 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Dingkun
2020. Censorship and Manipulation in Audiovisual Translation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Audiovisual Translation and Media Accessibility [Palgrave Studies in Translating and Interpreting, ], ► pp. 621 ff. DOI logo
Wongseree, Thandao
2020. Understanding Thai fansubbing practices in the digital era: a network of fans and online technologies in fansubbing communities. Perspectives 28:4 ► pp. 539 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.