Article published in:Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching Technology and Tasks
Edited by Marta González-Lloret and Lourdes Ortega
[Task-Based Language Teaching 6] 2014
► pp. 79–114
Chapter 4. Textbooks, tasks, and technology
An action research study in a textbook-bound EFL context
This chapter reports on an action research study conducted in the context of English as a foreign language (EFL) tertiary education in Mexico. It examines the educational value of blending technology into a task-based instruction module that was designed around a pre-during-post-task model, following the main tenets of task-based language teaching (Ellis 2003; Van den Branden,Bygate & Norris 2009). The participants were three intact classes of pre-intermediate-level EFL students at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) who completed 8 two-hour classes on a module of their textbook targeting grammar learning (simple past, past continuous, and used to). The module culminated with a writing activity, which served as the springboard for the design of an innovative Story Telling Contest task online. At the end of the textbook module, Group A (N = 25) engaged in this task-based, technology-mediated instructional design, Group B (N = 23) experienced the same task-based design but with no digital tools, and Group C (N = 25) did the writing activity in the original design offered in the textbook. The three groups were compared by collecting student perceptions through questionnaires and by measuring grammar learning via a pre- and post-test of narrative past tense use. A subset of 7 learners who experienced the task with the support of technology was also interviewed a few months later. The triangulated evidence suggests that, while all three instructional approaches led to similar linguistic gains in the use of narrative tenses, Groups A and B perceived the task design to have helped them develop rich new competencies, more so than the technological element. Students in Group A reported some additional value in the technology-mediated TBLT experience, including the improvement of their digital skills and the easy delivery of instructional material to carry out the task. This action research study contributes to the understanding of ways in which a task mediated by digital tools can enhance language learning in the context of traditional textbook-bound curricula.
Published online: 24 July 2014
American Council of the Teaching of Foreign Languages [ACTFL]
(1999) Proficiency guidelines revised . Yonkers, NY: Author.
Council of Europe Modern Languages Division Strasbourg
(2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment [CEFR]. Cambridge, UK: CUP.
Cunningham, S., & Moor, P.. (
2004) American cutting edge. Level 4. Teachers’ resource book (1st ed.). Hong Kong: Longman Asia ELT.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E.. (
2011) Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Longman.
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H.. (
2003) Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology , 7(3), 50–80.
Ducate, L. C., & Lomicka, L. L.. (
Ellis, R.. (
2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: OUP.
Hedge, T.. (
1998) Writing. Oxford , UK: OUP.
Littlewood, W.. (
Long, M. H.. (
1985) A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77–99). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Long, M. H., & Norris, J. M.. (
2000) Task-based teaching and assessment. In M. Byram (Ed.), Encyclopoedia of language teaching (pp. 597–603). London, UK: Routledge.
Manchón, R. M.
Murray, L., & Hourigan, T.. (
Norris, J. M.. (
Salaberry, M. R.. (
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M.. (
2008) Tasks in second language learning . Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
Schmidt, R. W.. (
2010) Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. M. Chan, S. Chi, K. N. Cin, J. Istanto, M. Nagami, J. W. Sew, T. Suthiwan & I. Walker (Eds.), Proceedings of CLaSIC 2010, Singapore, December 2-4 (pp. 721–737). Singapore: National University of Singapore, Centre for Language Studies.
Skehan, P.. (
1998) A cognitive approach to language learning . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Solares, M. E.. (
Swan, M.. (
Thomas, M. & Reinders, H.. (
Eds) (2010) Task-Based language learning and teaching with technology . London, UK: Continuum.
Vale, D., & Feunteun, A.. (
1995) Teaching children. A training course for teachers of English to children . Cambridge, UK: CUP.
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. M.. (
Eds) (2009) Task-based language teaching: A reader . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vandergrift, L.. (
2006) New Canadian perspectives: Proposal for a common framework of reference for languages for Canada. Retrieved from <http://www.caslt.org/pdf/Proposal_Common%20Framework_Reference_languages%20for%20Canada_PDF_Internet_e.pdf>
Waters, A.. (
2009, September). Tasks in textbooks: barking up the wrong tree? Paper presented at the 3rd Biennial Conference on Task-based Language Teaching, Lancaster University, UK.
Willis, J., & Leaver, B.. (
Eds) (2004) Task-based instruction in foreign language education. Practices and programs . Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Cited by other publications
Bolgün, M. Ali & Tatiana McCaw
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.