Cover not available
Part of
Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners
Edited by Maya Hickmann †, Edy Veneziano and Harriet Jisa
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 22] 2018
► pp. 45–62

Chapter 2
Phonological categories and their manifestation in child phonology

| Department of Linguistics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada
The nature of phonological representations and of their acquisition by language learners has been a subject of debate since at least the 1970s. Vihman and Croft (2007) recently proposed the ‘Radical’ Templatic approach to phonology, which formally rejects segmental features as independent units of phonological representation, in spite of their central relevance within mainstream theories of phonology since at least the 1940s. In this chapter, I emphasize that abstract categories are in fact central to our characterization of phonological systems and their acquisition by language learners. I discuss longitudinal data on the development of consonants and consonant clusters in the productions of Catootje, a Dutch-learning child. I highlight several categorical effects that are readily captured in models of phonological development which embrace abstract units such as features and syllable constituents.
Keywords: phonology, prosody, acquisition, category, first language, syllable constituents, variability
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Background
    • 1.1Abstract phonological models
    • 1.2‘Radical’ Templatic Phonology
  • 2.Case study
    • 2.1The corpus
    • 2.2The target system
    • 2.3Catootje’s general development of singleton and branching onsets
    • 2.4Variability in the acquisition of [d] in onsets
    • 2.5Variability in the acquisition of onset clusters
  • 3.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.03ros
References
Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E. V. M.
2011 Child Language Acquisition: Contrasting Theoretical Approaches. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barlow, J. A.
2003 Asymmetries in the acquisition of consonant clusters in Spanish. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 48(3–4): 179–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. E. & Edwards, J.
2000 Lexical frequency effects on young children’s imitative productions. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon, M. B. Broe & J. B. Pierrehumbert (eds), 207–217. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, B. H. & Stemberger, J. P.
1998 Handbook of Phonological Development from the Perspective of Constraint-Based Nonlinear Phonology. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Booij, G.
1999 The Phonology of Dutch. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004 Reflections on usage-based phonology. Book Review of Joan Bybee, 2001, Phonology and Language Use. Studies in Language 28: 225–237.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L.
2001 Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M.
1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Demuth, K.
1995 Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 25, J. N. Beckman (ed.), 13–25. Amherst MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.Google Scholar
2001 A prosodic approach to filler syllables. Journal of Child Language 28(1): 246–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K., Patrolia, M., Yung Song J. & Masapollo, M.
2011 The development of articles in children’s early Spanish: Prosodic interactions between lexical and grammatical form. First Language 32(1–2): 17–37.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. & Farwell, C. B.
1975 Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language 51: 419–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fikkert, P.
1994 On the Acquisition of Prosodic Structure [HIL Dissertations in Linguistics 6]. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. & Freitas, M. J.
2004 The role of language-specific phonotactics in the acquisition of onset clusters. In Linguistics in the Netherlands, L. Cornips & J. Doetjes (eds), 58–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2006 Allophony and allomorphy cue phonological development: Evidence from the European Portuguese vowel system. Journal of Catalan Linguistics 5: 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fikkert, P. & Levelt, C.
2008 How does place fall into place? The lexicon and emergent constraints in children’s developing grammars. In Contrast in Phonology: Theory, Perception, Acquisition, P. Avery, B. Elan Dresher & K. Rice (eds), 231–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R.
1957 Papers in Linguistics, 1934–1951. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Fudge, E. C.
1969 Syllables. Journal of Linguistics 5: 253–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 Branching structure within the syllable. Journal of Linguistics 23: 359–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerken, L.
1996 Prosodic structure in young children’s language production. Language 72(4): 683–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goad, H.
2012 sC Clusters Are (almost always) coda-initial. The Linguistic Review 29(3): 335–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goad, H. & Rose, Y.
2004 Input elaboration, head faithfulness and evidence for representation in the acquisition of left-edge clusters in West Germanic. In Constraints in Phonological Acquisition, R. Kager, J. Pater & W. Zonneveld (eds), 109–157. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. A.
1976 An overview of Autosegmental Phonology. Linguistic Analysis 2: 23–68.Google Scholar
Hale, M. & Reiss, C.
1998 Formal and empirical arguments concerning phonological acquisition. Linguistic Inquiry 29(4): 656–683. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 The Phonological Enterprise. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.
1941 Kindersprache, Aphasie, und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell. [English edition, Keiler, R. (trans) 1968 Child Language, Aphasia, and Phonological Universals. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., Fant, G. & Halle, M.
1952 Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, D.
1976 Syllable-based Generalizations in English Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B. & McGregor, K. K.
1991 Unusual phonological patterns and their underlying representations: A case study. Journal of Child Language 18: 261–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, C.
1994 On the Acquisition of Place [HIL Dissertations in Linguistics 8]. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
Lieven, E.
2010 Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua 120(11): 2546–2556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macken, M. A.
1979 Developmental reorganization of phonology: A hierarchy of basic units of acquisition. Lingua 49: 11–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 Where’s phonology? In Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications, C. A. Ferguson, L. Menn & C. Stoel-Gammon (eds), 249–269. Timonium MD: York Press.Google Scholar
1996 Phonological acquisition. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), 671–696. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, P. F. & Davis, B. L.
1990 Acquisition of speech production: Frames, then content. In Attention and Performance, XIII: Motor Representation and Control, M. Jeannerod (ed.), 453–476. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2000 On the origin of internal structure of word forms. Science 288: 527–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menn, L.
1971 Phonotactic Rules in beginning speech: A study in the development of English discourse. Lingua 26: 225–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983 Development of articulatory, phonetic, and phonological capabilities. In Language Production, Vol. 2, B. Butterworth (ed.), 1–49. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Menn, L. & Vihman, M. M.
2011 Features in child phonology. In Where do Phonological Features Come From? [Language Faculty and Beyond 6], G. N. Clements & R. Ridouane (eds), 261–301. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mielke, J.
2011 Distinctive features. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume, M. van Oostendorp & K. Rice (eds), 391–415. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pater, J.
1999 Austronesian nasal substitution and other NC effects. In The Prosody-Morphology Interface, R. Kager, W. Zonneveld & H. van der Hulst (eds), 310–343. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. M.
1977 Language learning strategies: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? Language 53: 560–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 Language typology, prosody and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 5, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 136–197. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2001 Fillers syllables: What is their status in emerging grammar. Journal of Child Language 28: 229–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. M. & Menn, L.
1993 False starts and filler syllables: Ways to learn grammatical morphemes. Language 69: 742–777. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B.
2003 Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech 46(2–3): 115–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Priestly, T. M. S.
1977 One idiosyncratic strategy in the acquisition of phonology. Journal of Child Language 4: 45–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, K.
1992 On deriving sonority: A structural account of sonority relationships. Phonology 9: 61–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, Y.
1997 Sonority and the acquisition of Dutch syllable structure. In Proceedings of the Montréal-Ottawa-Toronto Phonology Workshop, Vol. 16, P. Avery & C. Smallwood (eds), 133–143. Toronto: Linguistics Graduate Course Union.Google Scholar
2009 Internal and external influences on child language productions. In Approaches to Phonological Complexity, F. Pellegrino, E. Marsico, I. Chitoran & C. Coupé (eds), 329–351. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, Y. & Inkelas, S.
2011 The interpretation of phonological patterns in first language acquisition. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume, M. van Oostendorp & K. Rice (eds), 2414–2438. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, Y. & MacWhinney, B.
2014 The PhonBank Project: Data and software-assisted methods for the study of phonology and phonological development. In The Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology, J. Durand, U. Gut & G. Kristoffersen (eds), 380–401. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rose, Y., MacWhinney, B., Byrne, R., Hedlund, G., Maddocks K., O’Brien P. & Wareham T.
2006 Introducing Phon: A software solution for the study of phonological acquisition. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia & C. Zaller (eds), 489–500. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O.
1980a Prosodic domains in phonology: Sanskrit revisited. In Juncture: A Collection of Original Papers, M. Aronoff & M. L. Kean (eds), 107–129. Saratoga CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
1980b The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 563–605.Google Scholar
1982 The syllable. In The Structure of Phonological Representation, Vol. 2, H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (eds), 337–385. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V.
1973 The Acquisition of Phonology: A Case Study. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N.
1969 Principles of Phonology. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Velleman, S. L.
1996 Metathesis highlights feature-by-position constraints. In Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition, B. H. Bernhardt, J. Gilbert & D. Ingram (eds), 173–186. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Veneziano, E. & Sinclair, H.
2000 The changing status of “filler syllables” on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language 27(3): 461–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M.
2014 Phonological Development: The First Two Years, 2nd edn. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. & Croft, W.
2007 Phonological development: toward a “radical” templatic phonology. Linguistics 45(4): 683–725. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M. & Velleman, S. L.
2000 The construction of a First Phonology. Phonetica 57(2–4): 255–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waterson, N.
1971 Child phonology: A prosodic review. Journal of Linguistics 7: 179–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 Prosodic Phonology: The Theory and its Application to Language Acquisition and Speech Processing. Newcastle upon Tyne: Grevatt & Grevatt.Google Scholar
Wauquier-Gravelines, S. & Yamaguchi, N.
2013 Templates in French. In The Emergence of Phonology: Whole-word Approaches and Cross-linguistic Evidence, M. M. Vihman & T. Keren-Portnoy (eds), 317–342. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar