Chapter 19
Spoken and written narratives from French- and English-speaking children with Language Impairment\
Judy S. Reilly | Department of Psychology, San Diego State University | Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l’Apprentissage, Université de Poitiers & CNRS
† Josie Bernicot | Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l’Apprentissage, Université de Poitiers & CNRS
Lara Polse | San Diego State University | Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego
Thierry Olive | Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l’Apprentissage, Université de Poitiers & CNRS
Joel Uze | Unité de Recherche Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit de Poitiers
Beverly Wulfeck | Speech, Language, & Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University
Lucie Broc | Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l’Apprentissage, Université de Poitiers & CNRS
Monik Favart | Laboratoire Bases, Corpus, Langage, Université Nice Sophia Antipolis & CNRS
Mark Appelbaum | Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego
Children with Language Impairment (LI) show significant delays in spoken language development with persistent problems in morphology. In this chapter, we compare spoken and written narratives from children with LI and their typically developing peers (TD) in French and English. We investigate the role of modality (spoken and written language), and the contribution of language-specific factors (French and English) to the LI phenotype. We found that both French and English LI groups exhibit problems with morphology; however, they use complex syntax strategically to bring coherence to their stories. Moreover, both LI and TD children are sensitive to the pragmatic and rhetorical conventions of their linguistic communities. Our findings increase our understanding of the nature of LI, and how language-specific features and culture might affect this profile.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The narrative study
- 3.Analysis and results
- 3.1Length
-
3.2Morphology
- 3.3Complex syntax
- 3.4Syntactic depth
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Language, modality, and Language Impairment
-
Note
-
References
-
Appendix
References (27)
References
Appelbaum, M. I. & Cramer, E. M. 1974. Some problems in the non-orthogonal analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin 81(6): 335–343.
Bishop, D. V. M. 1997. Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Language Comprehension in Children. Hove: Psychology Press.
Bishop, D. V. M. & Edmundson, A. 1987. Language-impaired 4-year-olds: Distinguishing transient from persistent impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 52: 156–173.
Broc, J., Bernicot, J., Olive, T., Favart, M., Uzé, J. & Reilly, J. 2013. Spelling in children and adolescents with specific language impairment: Variations in different writing situations. Research in Developmental Disabilities 34: 3253–3266.
Chafe, W. 1964. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Colozzo, P., Gillam, R. B., Wood, M., Schnell, R. D. & Johnston, J. R. 2011. Content and form in the narratives of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54(6): 1609–1627.
Conti-Ramsden, G. & Botting, N. 1999. Classification of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42: 1195–1204.
Crystal, D. 2003. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
de Weck, G. & Rosat, M. -C. 2003. Troubles Dysphasiques. Comment Raconter, Relater, Faire Agir à l'Age Préscolaire. Paris: Masson.
Dockrell, J. E., Lindsay, G. Connelly, V. & Mackie, C. 2007. Constraints in the production of written texts in children with specific language impairment. Exceptional Children 73(2): 147–164.
Duncan, L., Colé, P. & Casalis, S. 2009. Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French. Applied Psycholinguistics 30: 405–440.
Evans, J., Saffran, J. & Robe-Torres, K. 2009. Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52: 321–335.
Fey, M. E., Catts, H. W., Proctor-Williams, K., Tomblin, J. B. & Zhang, X. 2004. Oral and written story composition skills of children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47: 1301–1318.
Frizelle, P. & Fletcher, P. 2014. Relative clause constructions in children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 49(2): 255–264.
Gillam, R. B. & Johnston, J. 1992. Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning-impaired and normally achieving school age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35(6): 1303–1315.
Leonard, L. 1998. Children with Specific Language Impairment. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Marchman V. A., Wulfeck B. & Ellis Weismer S. E. 1999. Morphological productivity in children with normal language and specific language impairment: A study of the English past tense. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42: 206–219.
Nagy, W. E. & Anderson, R. 1984. How many words are there in printed English schoolbooks? Reading Research Quarterly 19(3): 304–330.
Nir, B. & Berman, R. 2010. Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric Journal of Pragmatics 42: 744–765.
Reilly, J., Bernicot, J., Olive, T., Favart, M., Wulfeck, B. & Appelbaum, A. 2014. Written narratives from French and English speaking children with language impairment. In Handbook of Writing Development and Instruction in Children with Hearing, Speech and Oral Language Difficulties, B. Arfé, J. Dockrell, & V. Berninger (eds), 176–187. Oxford: OUP.
Reilly, J., Losh, M., Bellugi, U. & Wulfeck, B. 2004. Frog, where are you? Narratives in children with specific language impairment, early focal brain injury and Williams Syndrome. Brain & Language 88: 229–247.
Reilly, J., Wasserman, S. & Appelbaum, M. 2012. Later language development in narratives in children with perinatal stroke. Developmental Science 2012: 1–17.
Rey-Debove, J. 1984. Le domaine de la morphologie lexicale. Cahiers de Lexicologie 45: 3–19.
Rice, M., Wexler, K. & Cleave, P. 1995. Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38: 850–863.
Scott, C. M. & Windsor, J. 2000. General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 43: 324–339.
Tolchinsky, L. 2003. The Cradle of Culture. New York NY: Taylor & Francis.
Ullman, M. & Pierpont, E. 2005. Specific language impairment is not specific to language: The procedural deficit hypothesis. Cortex 41: 399–433.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Broc, Lucie, Isabelle Negro, Nelly Joye & Thierry Olive
2023.
Est-ce que les enfants avec un Trouble développemental du langage oral scolarisés en milieu ordinaire choisissent d’écrire des mots fréquents et consistants pour éviter les fautes d’orthographe ?.
La nouvelle revue - Éducation et société inclusives N° 97:3
► pp. 157 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.