Part of
Current Perspectives on Child Language Acquisition: How children use their environment to learn
Edited by Caroline F. Rowland, Anna L. Theakston, Ben Ambridge and Katherine E. Twomey
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 27] 2020
► pp. 247262
Allen, S. E. M.
(1996) Aspects of argument structure acquisition in Inuktitut. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L.
(1998) Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9(4), 321–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behrens, H.
(2002) Learning multiple regularities: Evidence from overgeneralization errors in the German plural. In A. H-J. Do, L. Domínguez, & A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 61–71). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, B.
(2007) Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments. Linguistic Typology, 11, 239–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Linguistic diversity and universals. In N. J. Enfield, P. Kockelman, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 102–127). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, B., Nichols, J., Zakharko, T., Witzlack-Makarevich, A., Hildebrandt, K., Rießler, M., Bierkandt, L., Zúñiga, F., & Lowe, J. B.
(2017) The AUTOTYP typological databases (version 0.1). San Francisco, CA: GitHub. Retrieved from [URL]> (31 January 2020).
Bickel, B., & Zúñiga, F.
(2017) The ‘word’ in polysynthetic languages: Phonological and syntactic challenges. In M. D. Fortescue, M. Mithun, & N. Evans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis (pp. 158–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bittner, D., & Köpcke, K.-M.
(2001) Acquisition of the German plural markings. A case study in natural and cognitive morphology. In C. Schaner-Wolles, J. Rennison, & F. Neubarth (Eds.), Naturally! Linguistic studies in honour of Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler presented on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 47–58). Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Brittain, J.
(2015) Corpus of the Chisasibi child language acquisition study (CCLAS). Retrieved from [URL]> (5 February 2020).
Brodsky, P., Waterfall, H. R., & Edelman, S.
(2007) Characterizing motherese: On the computational structure of child-directed language. In D. S. McNamara & G. T. Jackson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Cognitive Science Society Conference (pp. 833–838). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brown, P.
(2010) Cognitive anthropology. In L. Cummings (Ed.), The Routledge pragmatics encyclopedia (pp. 43–46). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burgin, C. J., Colella, J. P., Kahn, P. L., & Upham, N. S.
(2018) How many species of mammals are there? Journal of Mammalogy, 11, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
(2003) A construction based analysis of child-directed speech. Cognitive Science, 27, 843–873. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
(2000) Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories. In P. M. Vogel & B. Comrie (Eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes (pp. 65–102). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K.
(2015) Demuth Sesotho corpus. Retrieved from [URL]> (5 February 2020).
Dixon, R. M. W.
(1982) Where have all the adjectives gone? and other essays in semantics and syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M. S., & Haspelmath, M.
(Eds.) (2013) The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. [URL]> (31 January 2020).
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C.
(2009) The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil, D., & Tadmor, U.
(2007) The MPI-EVA Jakarta child language database. A joint project of the Department of Linguistics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and the Center for Language and Culture Studies, Atma Jaya Catholic University. [URL]> (31 January 2020).
Grigonytė, G., & Björkenstam, K. N.
(2016) Language-independent exploration of repetition and variation in longitudinal child-directed speech: A tool and resources. In Proceedings of the joint workshop on NLP for Computer Assisted Language Learning and NLP for Language Acquisition at SLTC, Umeå, 16th November (pp. 41–50). Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C.
(1996) Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
(2011) The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica, 45, 31–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T.
(2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A.
(2010) Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E.
(2009) Language development (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Janssen, D., Bickel, B., & Zúñiga, F.
(2006) Randomization tests in language typology. Linguistic Typology, 10, 419–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J.
(1990) Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmerer, D.
(2014) Word classes in the brain: Implications of linguistic typology for cognitive neuroscience. Cortex, 58, 27–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M.
(1988) Schemas in German plural formation. Lingua, 74(4), 303–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) The acquisition of plural marking in English and German revisited: Schemata versus rules. Journal of Child Language, 25(2), 293–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Küntay, A. C., Koçbaş, D., & Sabri Taşçı, S.
(2015) Koç University longitudinal language development database on language acquisition of 8 children from 8 to 36 months of age.Google Scholar
Küntay, A. C., & Slobin, D. I.
(1996) Listening to a Turkish mother: Some puzzles for acquisition. In D. I. Slobin, J. Guo, & A. Kyratzis (Eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 265–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2002) Putting interaction back into child language: Examples from Turkish. Psychology of Language and Communication, 6, 5–14.Google Scholar
Lieven, E.
(2010) Language development in a cross-linguistic context. In M. Kail & M. Hickmann (Eds.), Language acquisition across linguistic and cognitive systems (pp. 91–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E. V.
(1994) Crosslinguistic and crosscultural aspects of language addressed to children. In C. Gallaway & B. J. Richards (Eds.), Input and interaction in language acquisition (pp. 56–73). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. F.
(1995) Children’s overregularization of English plurals: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Child Language, 22, 447–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T. J., Xu, F., & Clahsen, H.
(1992) Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57, 1–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mintz, T. H.
(2003) On the distribution of frames in child-directed speech as a basis for grammatical category learning. In B. Beachley, A. Brown, & F. Conlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 545–555). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Mintz, T. H., Newport, E. L., & Bever, T. G.
(2002) The distributional structure of grammatical categories in speech to young children. Cognitive Science, 26, 393–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyata, S.
(2012) Japanese CHILDES: The 2012 CHILDES manual for Japanese. [URL]> (3 February 2020).
Moran, S., Blasi, D. E., Schikowski, R., Küntay, A. C., Pfeiler, B., Allen, S. E. M., & Stoll, S.
(2018) A universal cue for grammatical categories in the input to children: Frequent frames. Cognition, 175, 131–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moran, S., Lester, N., Heath, G., Küntay, A. C., Pfeiler, B., Allen, S. E. M., & Stoll, S.
(2019) Variation sets in maximally diverse languages. In M. M. Brown & B. Dailey (Eds.), Proceedings of 43th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 427–440). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Moran, S., Schikowski, R., Pajović, D., Hysi, C., & Stoll, S.
(2016) The ACQDIV corpus. Zurich: University of Zurich.Google Scholar
Moran, S. P.
(2012) Phonetics information base and lexicon (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington.Google Scholar
Nichols, J.
(1992) Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E.
(1988) Culture and language development: Language acquisition and language socialization in a Samoan village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Onnis, L., Edelman, S., & Waterfall, H. R.
(2011) Local statistical learning under cross-situational uncertainty. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2697–2702). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Onnis, L., Waterfall, H. R., & Edelman, S.
(2008) Learn locally, act globally: Learning language from variation set cues. Cognition, 109(3), 423–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palancar, E.
(2006) Property concepts in Otomi: A language with no adjectives. International Journal of American Linguistics, 72(3), 325–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, J.
(2010) A grammar of Kharia: A South Munda language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pfeiler, B.
n. d.). Pfeiler Yucatec Child Language Corpus. Ms.
Prasada, S., & Pinker, S.
(1993) Generalizations of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 1–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L.
(1996) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiering, R., Bickel, B., & Hildebrandt, K. A.
(2010) The prosodic word is not universal, but emergent. Journal of Linguistics, 46(3), 657–709. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
(1985) Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Volume 2: Theoretical issues (pp. 1157–1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(1997) The universal, the typological and the particular in acquisition. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 5, pp. 1–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stoll, S., Abbot-Smith, K., & Lieven, E.
(2009) Lexically restricted utterances in Russian, German and English child-directed speech. Cognitive Science, 33, 75–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stoll, S., & Bickel, B.
(2013) Capturing diversity in language acquisition research. In B. Bickel, L. A. Grenoble, D. A. Peterson, & A. Timberlake (Eds.), Language typology and historical contingency: Studies in honor of Johanna Nichols (pp. 195–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stoll, S., Lieven, E., Banjade, G., Bhatta, T. N., Gaenszle, M., Paudyal, N. P., Rai, M., Rai, N. K., Rai, I. P., Zakharko, T., Schikowski, R., & Bickel, B.
(2019) Audiovisual corpus on the acquisition of Chintang by six children. Zurich: University of Zurich.Google Scholar
Stoll, S., & Meyer, R.
(2008) Audio-visual longitudinal corpus on the acquisition of Russian by 5 children. Zurich: University of Zurich.Google Scholar
Waterfall, H. R.
(2006) A little change is a good thing: Feature theory, language acquisition and variation sets (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Wirén, M., Nilsson Björkenstamm, K., Grigonyte, G., & Eir Cortes, E.
(2016) Longitudinal studies of variation sets in child-directed speech. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Learning (pp. 44–52). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar