Ergativity in Indo-Aryan and beyond
Eystein Dahl | UiT – The Arctic University of Norway & Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan
Krzysztof Stroński | UiT – The Arctic University of Norway & Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan
This chapter gives an overview of the current state of the art of research on ergativity in Indo-Aryan. First, it discusses a number of theoretical and terminological issues concerning synchronic and diachronic dimensions of ergative alignment and outlines a typology for exploring the relationship between ergativity and other alignment types with particular reference to the South-Asian linguistic area. Second, it provides an overview of the Modern Indo-Aryan languages showing ergative alignment in parts of their verbal system and of the striking variation in this domain. Third, it explores the various hypotheses regarding the origin and development of ergative alignment in Indo-Aryan.
References
Aissen, Judith
1999 Markedness and subject choice in Optimality Theory.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 673-711.
Aissen, Judith
2003 Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435-483.
Andersen, Paul Kent
1985 Die grammatische Kategorie Passiv im Altindischen: Ihre Funktion. In
Grammatische Kategorien. Funktion und Geschichte,
Benfried Schlerath (ed.), 47–57. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
Andersen, Paul Kent
1986a Die ta-Partizipialkonstruktion bei Aśoka: Passiv oder Ergativ? Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 99: 75–96.
Andersen, Paul Kent
1986b The genitive agent in Rigvedic passive constructions. In
Collectanea linguistica in honorem Adami Heinz [
Prace Komisji Językoznawstwa 53], 9–13. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
Anderson, Stephen R
1976 On the notion of subject in ergative languages. In
Subject and Topic,
Charles Li (ed.), 3–23. New York NY: Academic Press.
Anderson, Stephen R
1977 On mechanisms by which languages become ergative. In
Mechanisms of Syntactic Change,
Charles Li (ed.), 317-363. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
Benveniste Emile
1952 La construction passive du parfait transitif.
Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 48(1): 176-186.
Bickel, Balthasar & Yādava, Yogendra P
2000 A fresh look at grammatical relations in Indo-Aryan.
Lingua 110: 342-373.
Bubenik, Vit
1989 On the origins and elimination of ergativity in Indo-Aryan languages.
Canadian Journal of Linguistics 34(4): 377–398.
Bubenik, Vit
1996 The Structure and Development of Middle Indo-Aryan Dialects. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Butt, Miriam
2001 A reexamination of the accusative to ergative shift in Indo-Aryan. In
Time Over Matter: Diachronic Perspectives on Morphosyntax,
Miriam Butt &
Tracy Holloway King (eds), 105–141. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Butt, Miriam
2006 Theories of Case. Cambridge: CUP.
Bynon, Theodora
2005 Evidential, raised possessor and the historical source of the ergative construction in Indo-Iranian.
Transactions of the Philological Society 103(1): 1–72.
Cardona, George
1970 The Indo-Iranian construction mana (mama) krtam
.
Language 46: 1–12.
Cardona, George
1974 The Indo-Aryan languages.
Encyklopedia Britannica, 15th edn, 9: 439-450.
Cardona, George
2002 The old Indo-Aryan tense system.
JAOS 122 (Indic and Iranian Studies in Honor of Stanley Insler on His Sixty-Fifth Birthday): 235-243.
Chatterji, Suniti Kumar
1970[1926] The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Comrie, Bernard
1978 Ergativity. In
Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language,
Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), 323–393. Texas TX: University of Texas Press.
Comrie, Bernard
1989 Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and Morphology, 2nd edn. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Dahl, Eystein
2009 Semantische und pragmatisch-kontextuelle Faktoren in der Entwicklung des altindoarischen Perfekts. In
Pragmatische Kategorien. Form, Funktion und Diachronie. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft in Marburg, 24.-26.9.2007,
Elisabeth Rieken &
Paul Widmer (eds), 35-50. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
Dahl, Eystein
2010 Time, Tense and Aspect in Early Vedic Grammar. Exploring Inflectional Semantics in the Rigveda. Leiden: Brill.
Dahl, Eystein
2012 Evidence for evidentiality in Late Vedic. In
Indic across the Millennia: from Rigveda to Modern Indo-Aryan. 14th World Sanskrit Conference, Kyoto, Japan, September 1-5 2009. Proceedings of the Linguistics Section,
Jared Klein &
Kazuhiko Yoshida (eds), 9-23 Bremen: Ute Hempen.
Dahl, Eystein
2014a The development of the Vedic perfect: From anterior to inferential past. In
Vedic and Sanskrit Historical Linguistics: Papers from the 13th World Sanskrit Conference,
Jared Klein &
Elizabeth Tucker (eds), 179-242. New Delhi: Motilal Banarshidas.
Dahl, Eystein
2014b Partitive subjects and objects in Indo-Iranian and beyond. In
Partitive Cases and Related Categories,
Silvia Luraghi &
Tuomas Huumo (eds), 417-441. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Dahl, Eystein & Fedriani, Chiara
2012 The argument structure of experience: Experiential constructions in Early Vedic, Homeric Greek and Early Latin.
Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3): 342-362.
Davison, Alice
2008 Case Restriction on Control: Implications for Movement.
Journal of South Asian Linguistics 1 (1), 29-54.
de Hoop, Helen & Peter de Swart
(eds) 2008 Differential Subject Marking. Dordrecht: Springer.
Delbrück, Berthold
1888 Altindische Syntax. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.
Dik, Simon C
1978 Functional Grammar [
North-Holland Linguistic Series 37] Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Dik, Simon C
1989 The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause. Dordrecht: Foris.
Dixon, Robert M.W
1972 The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: CUP.
Dixon, Robert M.W
1979 Ergativity.
Language 55: 59–138.
Dixon, Robert M.W
1994 Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP.
Donohue, Mark & Wichmann, Søren
(eds) 2008 The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford: OUP.
Dryer, Matthew S
2007 Clause types. In
Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1: Clause Structure,
Timothy Shopen (ed.), 224-275. Cambridge: CUP.
Estival, Dominique & Myhill, John
Filimonova, Elena
2005 The noun phrase hierarchy and relational marking: Problems and counterevidence.
Linguistic Typology 9: 77–113.
Gildea, Spike & Castro Alves, Flávia
Givón, Talmy
2001a Syntax, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy
2001b Syntax, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gonda, Jan
1951 Remarks on the Sanskrit Passive. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Grierson, George A
1903-1928 Linguistic Survey of India, Vols. I-XI. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, India.
Grierson, George A
1934 On the Modern Indo-Aryan Vernaculars, reprinted from the Indian Antiquary 60-62 (1931-1933). Bombay: British India Press.
Gusain, Lakhan
2004 Marwari. M�nchen: Lincom Europa. Languages of the World/Materials 427.
Haspelmath, Martin
2011 On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology.
Linguistic Typology 15: 535–567
Hoernle, R
1880 A Comparative Grammar of the Gaudian Languages: With Special Reference to the Eastern Hindi Accompanied by a Language-map and a Table of Alphabets. London: Trübner.
Hock, Hans Heinrich
1986 P-oriented construction in Sanskrit. In
South Asian Languages. Structure, Convergence Diglossia,
Bhadriraju Krishnamurti,
Colin P. Masica &
Anjani Kumar Sinha (eds), 15–26. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Hook, Peter E
1991 On identyfying the conceptual restructuring of passive as ergative in Indo-Aryan. In
Pāṇinian Studies. Professor S. D. Joshi Felicitation Volume,
Madhav M. Deshpande &
Saroja Bhate (eds), 177- 199. Ann Arbor MI: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan.
Hook, Peter E
1996 Kesar of Layul: A central Asian epic in the Shina of Gultari. In
Studies in Pakistani Popular Culture,
William Hanaway &
Wilma Heston (eds), 121-183. Lahore: Sang-e-Meel and Lok Virsa.
Iemmolo, Giorgio & Klumpp, Gerson
(eds) 2014 Special thematic issue on Differential Object Marking.
Linguistics 52(2).
Jamison, Stephanie W
1979a Remarks on the expression of agency with the passive in Vedic and Indo-European.
Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 93: 196-219.
Jamison, Stephanie W
1979b The case of the agent in Indo-European.
Die Sprache 25: 129-143.
Jamison, Stephanie W
1990 The tense of the predicated past participle in Vedic and beyond.
Indo-Iranian Journal 33: 1-19.
Jamison, Stephanie W
2000 Lurching towards ergativity: Expressions of agency in the Niya Documents.
Bulletin of the School of African and Oriental Studies 63(1): 64-80.
Katre, Sumitra M
1968 Problems of Reconstruction in Indo-Aryan. Simla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
Khokhlova, Ludmila V
1995 The development of patient-oriented constructions in late western NIA languages.
Osmania Papers in Linguistics 21: 15–51.
Khokhlova, Ludmila V
2001 Ergativity attrition in the history of western new Indo–Aryan languages (Punjabi, Gujarati and Rajastahani).
The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2001: 159–184.
Khokhlova, Ludmila V
2002 Syntactic peculiarities of Rajasthani. Paper read at the 17
th European Conference on Modern South Asian Studies, Heidelberg, September 9–14.
[URL]
Khokhlova, Ludmila V
2006 Sintaktičeskaja evolucija zapadnych novoindijskich jazykov v 15–20 vv. In
Aspekty komparativistiki [Orientalia et Classica: Trudy Instituta Vostočnych Kultur i Antičnosti: Vypusk VIII],
Anna V. Dybo,
Vladimir A. Dybo,
Oleg A. Mudrak &
George S. Starostin (eds), 151–186. Moskva: Rosijskij Gosudarstvennyj Gumanitarnyj Universitet.
Klaiman, Miriam H
1978 Arguments against a passive origin of the IA ergative. In
Chicago Linguistic Society: Papers from the 14th Regional Meeting
, 204–216. Chicago IL: CLS.
Klimov, Georgij A
1972 K xarakteristike jazykov aktivnogo stroja.
Voprosy Jazykoznanija 4: 3–13.
Klimov, Georgij A
1973 Očerk obščej teorii èrgativnosti. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.
Klimov, Georgij A
1977 Tipologija jazykov aktivnogo stroja. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.
Klimov, Georgij A
1983 Principy kontensivnoj tipologii. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.
Klimov, Georgij A. & Edel’man, Džoj I
1970 Jazyk burushaski. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.
Li, Chao
2007 Split ergativity and split intransitivity in Nepali.
Lingua 117: 1462–1482.
Magier David
1983 Topics in the Grammar of Marwari. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Manning, Christopher D
1996 Ergativity. Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Masica, Colin P
1979 Aryan and non-Aryan elements in North Indian agriculture. In
Aryan and Non-Aryan in India,
Madhav M. Deshpande &
Peter E. Hook (eds), 55–151. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Center for South Asian and Southeast Asian Studies.
Masica, Colin P
1991 The Indo-Aryan Languages. Cambridge: CUP.
McGregor, William B
2009 Typology of ergativity.
Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1): 480–508.
McGregor, William B
2010 Optional ergative case marking systems in a typological-semiotic perspective.
Lingua 120: 1610–1636.
Merlan, Francesca
1981 Some functional relations among subordination, mood, aspect and focus in Australian languages.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 175–210.
Meščaninov, Ivan I
1967 Ergativnaja konstrukcija v jazykach različnych tipov. Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.
Miltner, Vladimir
1965 From OIA passive to NIA active.
Asian and African Studies 1: 143–146.
Mithun, Marianne
1991 Active/agentive case marking and its motivations.
Language 67: 510–46.
Montaut, Annie
2006 The evolution of the tense-aspect system in Hindi/Urdu, and the status of the ergative alignment. In
Proceedings of the LFG 06 Conference.
Miriam Butt &
Tracy Holloway King (eds), 365–385. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.
Næss, Åshild
2004 What markedness marks: The markedness problem with direct objects.
Lingua 114: 1186–1212.
Nigam, R.C
1972 Language Handbook on Mother Tongue in Census (Census of India 1971) [
Census centenary Monograph No 10]. New Delhi: Government of India.
Palancar, Enrique
2002 The Origin of Agent Markers. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Payne, John R
1980 The decay of ergativity in Pamir languages.
Lingua 51: 147–186.
Peterson, John
1998 Grammatical relations in Pali and the emergence of ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Munich: Lincom.
Peterson, John
1999 Grammatische Relationen in Pali und die Entstehung von Ergativit�t im Indoarischen.
Historische Sprachforschung, 112/2: 227�263.
Pirejko, Lija A
1968 Osnovnyje voprosy ergativnosti na materiale indoiranskich jazykov. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.
Pray, Bruce
1976 From passive to ergative in NIA. In
The Notion of Subject in South Asian Languages [
South Asian Studies, Publication Series 2],
Manindra Verma (ed.), 195–211. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin.
Regamey, Constantin
1954 A propos de la “construction ergative” en indo-aryen moderne. In
Sprachgeschichte und Wortbedeutung, Festschrift Albrecht Debrunner, gewidmet von Schülern, Freunden und Kollegen,
Redard George (ed.), 363–381. Bern: Francke.
Šamatov, Azad N
1974 Klassičeskij dakxini. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.
Shackle, Christopher
1979 Problems of classification in Pakistan Punjab.
Transactions of the Philological Society 1979: 191-210.
Srishti, Recha
2006 Reflecting AGREE: Hindi-Urdu reflexives. In
Western Conference of Linguistics (WECOL) 2006 Proceedings, Vol.17,
Erin Bainbridge &
Brian Agbayani (eds), 361-72. Fresno CA: California State University.
Silverstein, Michael
1976 Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In
Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages,
Robert W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Skalmowski, Wojciech
1974 Transitive verb constructions in the Pamir and Dardic languages.
Studia Indoeuropejskie. Prace komisji Językoznawstwa 37: 205–212.
Southworth, Franklin C
2005 Linguistic Archeology of South Asia. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Speijer, J.S
1998[1886] Sanskrit Syntax. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass Publishers.
Stroński, Krzysztof
2010 Variation of ergativity patterns in Indo-Aryan.
Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46(2): 237–253.
Stroński, Krzysztof
2011 Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Tikkanen, Bertil
1988 On Burushaski and other ancient substrata in Northwest South Asia.
Studia Orientalia (Helsinki) 64: 303–325.
Trask, R. Larry
1979 On the origin of ergativity. In
Ergativity. Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations,
Frans Plank (ed.), 385–404. London: Academic Press.
Turner, Ralph L
1975 Collected Papers, 1912-1973. London: OUP.
Verbeke, Saartje
2013a Alignment and Ergativity in New Indo-Aryan Languages [
Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 51]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Verbeke, Saartje
2013b Differential subject marking in Nepali: The agent marker le in imperfective constructions.
Linguistics 51(3): 585 – 610.
Verma, Manindra K
(ed.) 1976 The Notion of Subject in South Asian Languages [
South Asian Studies, Publication Series 2]. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin.
von Hinüber, Oskar
1968 Studien zur Kasussyntax des Pāli, besonders des Vinaya-Piṭaka. München: Kitzinger.
De Vreese, Koenraad S.J.M
1959 Apabhraṃśa studies (III).
Journal of the American Oriental Society 79(1): 7-16.
Whitney, William Dwight
1888 Sanskrit Grammar. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Witzel, Michael
1989 Tracing the vedic dialects. In
Dialectes dans les langues indo-aryennes,
Colette Caillat (ed.), 97-265. Paris: College de France, Institut de Civilisation Indienne.
Witzel, Michael
1995 Early Indian history: Linguistic and textual parameters. In
Language, Material Culture and Ethnicity. The Indo-Aryans of Ancient South Asia,
George Erdosy (ed.), 85-125. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Witzel, Michael
1999 Substrate languages in Old Indo-Aryan (Rigvedic, Middle and LateVedic).
Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies 5(1): 1–67.
Zakharyin, Boris
1979 On the formation of ergativity in Indo-Aryan and Dardic.
Osmania Papers in Linguistics 5: 50–71.
Zakharyin, Boris
1982 Problemy jazykovych kontaktov w indijskich Gimalajach.
Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Serija 13, Vostokovedenije 3: 31–42.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Carling, Gerd & Chundra Cathcart
Eliasson, Pär & Marc Tang
2018.
The lexical and discourse functions of grammatical gender in Marathi
.
Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 5:2
► pp. 131 ff.
Zúñiga, Fernando
2018.
The diachrony of morphosyntactic alignment.
Language and Linguistics Compass 12:9
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.