Article published in:
Indo-Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective
Edited by Eystein Dahl and Krzysztof Stroński
[Typological Studies in Language 112] 2016
► pp. 138


Aissen, Judith
1999Markedness and subject choice in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 673-711. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435-483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Paul Kent
1985Die grammatische Kategorie Passiv im Altindischen: Ihre Funktion. In Grammatische Kategorien. Funktion und Geschichte, Benfried Schlerath (ed.), 47–57. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
1986aDie ta-Partizipialkonstruktion bei Aśoka: Passiv oder Ergativ? Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 99: 75–96.Google Scholar
1986bThe genitive agent in Rigvedic passive constructions. In Collectanea linguistica in honorem Adami Heinz [Prace Komisji Językoznawstwa 53], 9–13. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
1976On the notion of subject in ergative languages. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 3–23. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1977On mechanisms by which languages become ergative. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles Li (ed.), 317-363. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste Emile
1952La construction passive du parfait transitif. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 48(1): 176-186.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2008On the scope of the referential hierarchy in the typology of grammatical relations. In Case and Grammatical Relations. Studies in Honor of Bernard Comrie [Typological Studies in Language 81], Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds), 191-210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Yādava, Yogendra P.
2000A fresh look at grammatical relations in Indo-Aryan. Lingua 110: 342-373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bubenik, Vit
1989On the origins and elimination of ergativity in Indo-Aryan languages. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 34(4): 377–398.Google Scholar
1996The Structure and Development of Middle Indo-Aryan Dialects. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
1998A Historical Syntax of Late Middle Indo-Aryan (Apabhramśa) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 165]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam
2001A reexamination of the accusative to ergative shift in Indo-Aryan. In Time Over Matter: Diachronic Perspectives on Morphosyntax, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 105–141. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2006Theories of Case. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bynon, Theodora
2005Evidential, raised possessor and the historical source of the ergative construction in Indo-Iranian. Transactions of the Philological Society 103(1): 1–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardona, George
1970The Indo-Iranian construction mana (mama) krtam . Language 46: 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1974The Indo-Aryan languages. Encyklopedia Britannica, 15th edn, 9: 439-450.Google Scholar
2002The old Indo-Aryan tense system. JAOS 122 (Indic and Iranian Studies in Honor of Stanley Insler on His Sixty-Fifth Birthday): 235-243.Google Scholar
Chatterji, Suniti Kumar
1970[1926]The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1978Ergativity. In Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language, Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), 323–393. Texas TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1989Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and Morphology, 2nd edn. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Eystein
2009Semantische und pragmatisch-kontextuelle Faktoren in der Entwicklung des altindoarischen Perfekts. In Pragmatische Kategorien. Form, Funktion und Diachronie. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft in Marburg, 24.-26.9.2007, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds), 35-50. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
2010Time, Tense and Aspect in Early Vedic Grammar. Exploring Inflectional Semantics in the Rigveda. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Evidence for evidentiality in Late Vedic. In Indic across the Millennia: from Rigveda to Modern Indo-Aryan. 14th World Sanskrit Conference, Kyoto, Japan, September 1-5 2009. Proceedings of the Linguistics Section, Jared Klein & Kazuhiko Yoshida (eds), 9-23 Bremen: Ute Hempen.Google Scholar
2013Typological change in Vedic: The development of the Aorist from a perfective past to an immediate past. In Diachronic and Typological Perspectives on Verbs [Studies in Language Companion Series 134], Folke Josephson & Ingemar Söhrman (eds), 261-298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014aThe development of the Vedic perfect: From anterior to inferential past. In Vedic and Sanskrit Historical Linguistics: Papers from the 13th World Sanskrit Conference, Jared Klein & Elizabeth Tucker (eds), 179-242. New Delhi: Motilal Banarshidas.Google Scholar
2014bPartitive subjects and objects in Indo-Iranian and beyond. In Partitive Cases and Related Categories, Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds), 417-441. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dahl, Eystein & Fedriani, Chiara
2012The argument structure of experience: Experiential constructions in Early Vedic, Homeric Greek and Early Latin. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3): 342-362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davison, Alice
2008Case Restriction on Control: Implications for Movement. Journal of South Asian Linguistics 1 (1), 29-54.Google Scholar
de Hoop, Helen & Peter de Swart
(eds) 2008Differential Subject Marking. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
1888Altindische Syntax. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C.
1978Functional Grammar [North-Holland Linguistic Series 37] Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1989The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
1972The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1979Ergativity. Language 55: 59–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark & Wichmann, Søren
(eds) 2008The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2007Clause types. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 224-275. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Estival, Dominique & Myhill, John
1988Formal and functional aspects of the development from passive to ergative systems. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 441-491 Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filimonova, Elena
2005The noun phrase hierarchy and relational marking: Problems and counterevidence. Linguistic Typology 9: 77–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike
1997Evolution of grammatical relations in Cariban: How functional motivation precedes syntactic change. Grammatical Relations: A Functionalist Perspective [Typological Studies in Language 35], Talmy Givón (ed.), 155-198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike & Castro Alves, Flávia
2010Nominative-absolutive: Counter-universal split ergativity in Jê and Cariban. In Ergativity in Amazonia [Typological Studies in Language Spike 89], Spike Gildea & Francesc Queixalós (eds) 159-199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2001aSyntax, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001bSyntax, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gonda, Jan
1951Remarks on the Sanskrit Passive. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Grierson, George A.
1903-1928Linguistic Survey of India, Vols. I-XI. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, India.Google Scholar
1934On the Modern Indo-Aryan Vernaculars, reprinted from the Indian Antiquary 60-62 (1931-1933). Bombay: British India Press.Google Scholar
Gusain, Lakhan
2004Marwari. M�nchen: Lincom Europa. Languages of the World/Materials 427.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2011On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15: 535–567 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoernle, R.
1880A Comparative Grammar of the Gaudian Languages: With Special Reference to the Eastern Hindi Accompanied by a Language-map and a Table of Alphabets. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Heinrich
1986P-oriented construction in Sanskrit. In South Asian Languages. Structure, Convergence Diglossia, Bhadriraju Krishnamurti, Colin P. Masica & Anjani Kumar Sinha (eds), 15–26. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter E.
1991On identyfying the conceptual restructuring of passive as ergative in Indo-Aryan. In Pāṇinian Studies. Professor S. D. Joshi Felicitation Volume, Madhav M. Deshpande & Saroja Bhate (eds), 177- 199. Ann Arbor MI: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
1996Kesar of Layul: A central Asian epic in the Shina of Gultari. In Studies in Pakistani Popular Culture, William Hanaway & Wilma Heston (eds), 121-183. Lahore: Sang-e-Meel and Lok Virsa.Google Scholar
Iemmolo, Giorgio & Klumpp, Gerson
(eds) 2014Special thematic issue on Differential Object Marking. Linguistics 52(2).Google Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie W.
1979aRemarks on the expression of agency with the passive in Vedic and Indo-European. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 93: 196-219.Google Scholar
1979bThe case of the agent in Indo-European. Die Sprache 25: 129-143.Google Scholar
1990The tense of the predicated past participle in Vedic and beyond. Indo-Iranian Journal 33: 1-19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Lurching towards ergativity: Expressions of agency in the Niya Documents. Bulletin of the School of African and Oriental Studies 63(1): 64-80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katre, Sumitra M.
1968Problems of Reconstruction in Indo-Aryan. Simla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.Google Scholar
Khokhlova, Ludmila V.
1995The development of patient-oriented constructions in late western NIA languages. Osmania Papers in Linguistics 21: 15–51.Google Scholar
2001Ergativity attrition in the history of western new Indo–Aryan languages (Punjabi, Gujarati and Rajastahani). The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2001: 159–184.Google Scholar
2002Syntactic peculiarities of Rajasthani. Paper read at the 17th European Conference on Modern South Asian Studies, Heidelberg, September 9–14. www​.iaas​.msu​.ru​/pub​_on​/khokhlova
2006Sintaktičeskaja evolucija zapadnych novoindijskich jazykov v 15–20 vv. In Aspekty komparativistiki [Orientalia et Classica: Trudy Instituta Vostočnych Kultur i Antičnosti: Vypusk VIII], Anna V. Dybo, Vladimir A. Dybo, Oleg A. Mudrak & George S. Starostin (eds), 151–186. Moskva: Rosijskij Gosudarstvennyj Gumanitarnyj Universitet.Google Scholar
Klaiman, Miriam H.
1978Arguments against a passive origin of the IA ergative. In Chicago Linguistic Society: Papers from the 14th Regional Meeting , 204–216. Chicago IL: CLS.
Klimov, Georgij A.
1972K xarakteristike jazykov aktivnogo stroja. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 4: 3–13.Google Scholar
1973Očerk obščej teorii èrgativnosti. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.Google Scholar
1977Tipologija jazykov aktivnogo stroja. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.Google Scholar
1983Principy kontensivnoj tipologii. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.Google Scholar
Klimov, Georgij A. & Edel’man, Džoj I.
1970Jazyk burushaski. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.Google Scholar
Li, Chao
2007Split ergativity and split intransitivity in Nepali. Lingua 117: 1462–1482. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Magier David
1983Topics in the Grammar of Marwari. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Malchukov, Andrej
2006Transitivity parameters and transitivity alternations: Constraining co-variation. In Case, Valency and Transitivity, Leonid Kulikov, Andrej Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds), 329-357. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manning, Christopher D.
1996Ergativity. Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P.
1979Aryan and non-Aryan elements in North Indian agriculture. In Aryan and Non-Aryan in India, Madhav M. Deshpande & Peter E. Hook (eds), 55–151. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Center for South Asian and Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
1991The Indo-Aryan Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
McGregor, William B.
2009Typology of ergativity. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1): 480–508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Optional ergative case marking systems in a typological-semiotic perspective. Lingua 120: 1610–1636. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merlan, Francesca
1981Some functional relations among subordination, mood, aspect and focus in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 175–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meščaninov, Ivan I.
1967Ergativnaja konstrukcija v jazykach različnych tipov. Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.Google Scholar
Miltner, Vladimir
1965From OIA passive to NIA active. Asian and African Studies 1: 143–146.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1991Active/agentive case marking and its motivations. Language 67: 510–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montaut, Annie
2004Oblique main arguments in Hindi /Urdu as localizing predications. In Non-Nominative Subjects, Vol. 2[Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 33–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006The evolution of the tense-aspect system in Hindi/Urdu, and the status of the ergative alignment. In Proceedings of the LFG 06 Conference. Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 365–385. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2004What markedness marks: The markedness problem with direct objects. Lingua 114: 1186–1212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Case semantics and the agent-patient opposition. In Case, Valency and Transitivity, Leonid Kulikov, Andrej Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds), 309-327. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nigam, R.C.
1972Language Handbook on Mother Tongue in Census (Census of India 1971) [Census centenary Monograph No 10]. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
Palancar, Enrique
2002The Origin of Agent Markers. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John R.
1980The decay of ergativity in Pamir languages. Lingua 51: 147–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, John
1998Grammatical relations in Pali and the emergence of ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
1999Grammatische Relationen in Pali und die Entstehung von Ergativit�t im Indoarischen. Historische Sprachforschung, 112/2: 227�263.Google Scholar
Pirejko, Lija A.
1968Osnovnyje voprosy ergativnosti na materiale indoiranskich jazykov. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.Google Scholar
Pray, Bruce
1976From passive to ergative in NIA. In The Notion of Subject in South Asian Languages [South Asian Studies, Publication Series 2], Manindra Verma (ed.), 195–211. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Regamey, Constantin
1954A propos de la “construction ergative” en indo-aryen moderne. In Sprachgeschichte und Wortbedeutung, Festschrift Albrecht Debrunner, gewidmet von Schülern, Freunden und Kollegen, Redard George (ed.), 363–381. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Šamatov, Azad N.
1974Klassičeskij dakxini. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.Google Scholar
Shackle, Christopher
1979Problems of classification in Pakistan Punjab. Transactions of the Philological Society 1979: 191-210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Srishti, Recha
2006Reflecting AGREE: Hindi-Urdu reflexives. In Western Conference of Linguistics (WECOL) 2006 Proceedings, Vol.17, Erin Bainbridge & Brian Agbayani (eds), 361-72. Fresno CA: California State University.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Skalmowski, Wojciech
1974Transitive verb constructions in the Pamir and Dardic languages. Studia Indoeuropejskie. Prace komisji Językoznawstwa 37: 205–212.Google Scholar
Southworth, Franklin C.
2005Linguistic Archeology of South Asia. London: RoutledgeCurzon. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speijer, J.S.
1998[1886]Sanskrit Syntax. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass Publishers.Google Scholar
Stroński, Krzysztof
2010Variation of ergativity patterns in Indo-Aryan. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46(2): 237–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, Bertil
1988On Burushaski and other ancient substrata in Northwest South Asia. Studia Orientalia (Helsinki) 64: 303–325.Google Scholar
Trask, R. Larry
1979On the origin of ergativity. In Ergativity. Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Frans Plank (ed.), 385–404. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Ralph L.
1975Collected Papers, 1912-1973. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Verbeke, Saartje
2013aAlignment and Ergativity in New Indo-Aryan Languages [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 51]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bDifferential subject marking in Nepali: The agent marker le in imperfective constructions. Linguistics 51(3): 585 – 610. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verma, Manindra K.
(ed.) 1976The Notion of Subject in South Asian Languages [South Asian Studies, Publication Series 2]. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
von Hinüber, Oskar
1968Studien zur Kasussyntax des Pāli, besonders des Vinaya-Piṭaka. München: Kitzinger.Google Scholar
De Vreese, Koenraad S.J.M.
1959Apabhraṃśa studies (III). Journal of the American Oriental Society 79(1): 7-16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight
1888Sanskrit Grammar. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Witzel, Michael
1989Tracing the vedic dialects. In Dialectes dans les langues indo-aryennes, Colette Caillat (ed.), 97-265. Paris: College de France, Institut de Civilisation Indienne.Google Scholar
1995Early Indian history: Linguistic and textual parameters. In Language, Material Culture and Ethnicity. The Indo-Aryans of Ancient South Asia, George Erdosy (ed.), 85-125. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999Substrate languages in Old Indo-Aryan (Rigvedic, Middle and LateVedic). Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies 5(1): 1–67.Google Scholar
Zakharyin, Boris
1979On the formation of ergativity in Indo-Aryan and Dardic. Osmania Papers in Linguistics 5: 50–71.Google Scholar
1982Problemy jazykovych kontaktov w indijskich Gimalajach. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Serija 13, Vostokovedenije 3: 31–42.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Carling, Gerd & Chundra Cathcart
2021. Evolutionary dynamics of Indo-European alignment patterns. Diachronica 38:3  pp. 358 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.