Part of
Similative and Equative Constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Yvonne Treis and Martine Vanhove
[Typological Studies in Language 117] 2017
► pp. 932
References (53)
References
Álvarez, José. 2005. Comparative constructions in Guajiro/Wayuunaiki. Opción 47: 9–36.Google Scholar
Andersen, Paul Kent. 1983. Word Order Typology and Comparative Constructions [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berghäll, Liisa. 2010. Mauwake Reference Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2012. Universals in Comparative Morphology Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crane, Thera M., Hyman, Larry M. & Nsielanga Tukumu, Simon. 2011. A Grammar of Nzadi [B865]: A Bantu Language of Democratic Republic of Congo [University of California Publications in Linguistics 147]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Crass, Joachim. 2005. Das K’abeena: Deskriptive Grammatik einer hochlandostkuschitischen Sprache [Cushitic Language Studies 23]. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Curnow, Timothy. 1997. A Grammar of Awa Pit (Cuaiquier): An Indigenous Language of South-western Colombia. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Dhongde, Ramesh Vaman & Wali, Kashi. 2009. Marathi [London Oriental and African Languages Library 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1988. A Grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2008. Comparative constructions: A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language 32 (4): 787–817. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durie, Mark. 1985. A Grammar of Acehnese on the Basis of a Dialect of North Aceh. [Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut Voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 112]. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Faraclas, Nicholas G. 1996. Nigerian Pidgin. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleck, David W. 2003. A Grammar of Matses. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Johnston, Eric. 2005. A Grammar of Mina [Mouton Grammar Library 36]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff & Wierzbicka, Anna. 1994. Introducing lexical primitives. In Semantic and Lexical Universals: Theory and Empirical Findings [Studies in Language Companion Series 25], Cliff Goddard & Anna Wierzbicka (eds), 31–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963[1966]. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, 2nd edn, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1492–1510. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86 (3): 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Buchholz, Oda. 1998. Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 277–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1998. A Grammar of Koyra Chiini, the Songhay of Timbuktu [Mouton Grammar Library 19]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2005. A Grammar of Tamashek (Tuareg of Mali) [Mouton Grammar Library 35]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. A Grammar of Jamsay. [Mouton Grammar Library 45]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henkelmann, Peter. 2006. Constructions of equative comparison. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 59 (4): 370–398.Google Scholar
Kari, Ethelbert E. 2004. A Reference Grammar of Degema [Grammatische Analysen afrikanischer Sprachen 22]. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Kung, Susan Smythe. 2007. A Descriptive Grammar of Huehuetla Tepehua. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Löhr, Doris. 2002. Die Sprache der Malgwa (Nárá Málgwa). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mace, John. 2003. Persian Grammar: For Reference and Revision. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia. 1994. Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mennecier, Philippe. 1995. Le tunumiisut, dialecte inuit du Groenland oriental: Description et analyse. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Meyer, Ronny. 2005. Das Zay: Deskriptive Grammatik einer Ostguragesprache (Äthiosemitisch) [Grammatische Analysen afrikanischer Sprachen 25]. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Moyse-Faurie, Claire. 1995. Le xârâcùù langue de Thio-Canala, Nouvelle-Calédonie: Éléments de syntaxe [Langues et Cultures du Pacifique 10]. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 2011. Ingush Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina & Tolskaya, Maria. 2001. A Grammar of Udihe [Mouton Grammar Library 22]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nose, Masahiko. 2009. The expressions of comparative and similative in Oceanic and non-Oceanic languages: A typological study. Language and Linguistics of Oceania 1: 45–62Google Scholar
Olawsky, Knut. 2006. A Grammar of Urarina [Mouton Grammar Library 37]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Popjes, Jack & Popjes, Jo. 1986. Canela-Krahô. In Handbook of Amazonian Languages 1, Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey Pullum (eds), 128–199. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quesada, Juan Diego. 2000. A Grammar of Teribe [Lincom Studies in Native American Linguistics 36]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Rennison, John R. 1997. Koromfe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schaub, Willi. 1985. Babungo. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Selcan, Zülfü. 1998. Grammatik der Zaza-Sprache, Nord-Dialekt. Berlin: Wissenschaft und Technik.Google Scholar
Shay, Erin. 2005. A Grammar of East Dangla: The Simple Sentence. PhD dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 1985. Comparison and Universal Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2001. Comparative constructions. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 993–997. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2005. Comparative constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), 490–493. Oxford: OUP. Also in WALS Online: <[URL]>
Stolz, Thomas. 2013. Competing Comparative Constructions in Europe. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suárez, Jorge A. 1983. The Mesoamerican Indian Languages. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ultan, Russell. 1972. Some features of basic comparative constructions. Working Papers on Language Universals (Stanford) 9: 117–162.Google Scholar
Wali, Kashi & Koul, Omkar N. 1997. Kashmiri: A Cognitive-descriptive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wang, Peter, Hunt, Robert, McGriff, Jeff & Elkins, Richard E. 2006. The Grammar of Matigsalug Manobo. Dallas TX: SIL.Google Scholar
Wolfenden, Elmer. 1971. Hiligaynon Reference Grammar. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Zeitoun, Elizabeth. 2007. A Grammar of Mantauran (Rukai) [Language and Linguistics Monographs A4–2]. Taipei: Academia Sinica, Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Zigmond, Maurice L., Booth, Curtis G. & Munro, Pamela. 1991. Kawaiisu: A Grammar and Dictonary with Texts [University of California Publications in Linguistics 119]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (24)

Cited by 24 other publications

Winkler, Maria Emilia
2024. Equative-approximative markers in the Finno-Ugric languages: Interaction with quantitative scales and the development of ambiguity. Voprosy Jazykoznanija :4 DOI logo
Cao, Yuzhen & Qiongpeng Luo
2023. The semantics of scalar equatives in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 24:1  pp. 120 ff. DOI logo
De Clercq, Karen, Pavel Caha, Michal Starke & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd
2023. Degree Morphology. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sinitsyna, Julia
2023. CONSTRUCTIONS WITH THE MARKER KAD’JOS IN TATYSHLY UDMURT. Lomonosov Journal of Philology :№4, 2023  pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Giomi, Riccardo
2022. Similatives are Manners, comparatives are Quantities (except when they aren’t). Open Linguistics 8:1  pp. 650 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Mija
2022. Degree Equative Constructions in English. Lanaguage Research 58:1  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Mija
2022. Degree Equative Constructions in English. Lanaguage Research 58:1  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
König, Ekkehard & Letizia Vezzosi
Bobuafor, Mercy
2021. Comparative constructions in Tafi. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 42:2  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Hohaus, Vera & Malte Zimmermann
2021. Comparisons of Equality With Germanso…wie, and the Relationship Between Degrees and Properties. Journal of Semantics 38:1  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Niina Ning
2021. Pairing Degree-WH Clauses in Mandarin. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 42:2  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Berghoff, Robyn
2020. Evaluativity in the Afrikaans Equative and Excessive Constructions. Language Matters 51:2  pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Hohaus, Vera & M. Ryan Bochnak
2020. The Grammar of Degree: Gradability Across Languages. Annual Review of Linguistics 6:1  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Prescod, Paula
2020. Étude des constructions comparatives en créole vincentien. Études créoles :37 | 1-2 DOI logo
Prescod, Paula
2020. Introduction to the volume. Études créoles :37 | 1-2 DOI logo
Prescod, Paula & Béatrice Jeannot-Fourcaud
2020. Présentation. Études créoles :37 | 1-2 DOI logo
Chamoreau, Claudine
2019. Equative and similative constructions in Chibchan languages. Faits de Langues 50:1  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Chirkova, Katia
2019. Comparison constructions in Lizu (Tibeto-Burman). Faits de Langues 50:1  pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Guérin, Françoise
2019. La comparaison d’égalité et de similitude en tchétchène et langues apparentées. Faits de Langues 50:1  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Jeannot-Fourcaud, Béatrice
2019. L’unité kon en créoles guadeloupéen et martiniquais : Analyse multifactorielle de la comparaison d’égalité. Faits de Langues 50:1  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Lü, Shanshan
2019. Equative and similative constructions in Caijia (Sino-Tibetan). Faits de Langues 50:1  pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Pakendorf, Brigitte
2019. Expressing equality, similarity, and pretense in Even (Northern Tungusic, Siberia). Faits de Langues 50:1  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Rose, Françoise
2019. Similar but different: the functions of the Mojeño Trinitario root expressing similarity. Faits de Langues 50:1  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
König, Ekkehard
2017. Chapter 1. The comparative basis of intensification. In Exploring Intensification [Studies in Language Companion Series, 189],  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.