In this paper, we report on a world-wide study of equative constructions (‘A is as big as B’) in a convenience sample of 119 languages. From earlier work, it has been known that European languages often have equative constructions based on adverbial relative pronouns that otherwise express degree or manner (‘how’, ‘as’), but we find that this type is rare outside Europe. We divide the constructions that we found into six primary types, four of which have closely corresponding types of comparative constructions (‘A is bigger than B’). An equative construction often consists of five components: a comparee (‘A’), a degree-marker (‘as’), a parameter (‘is big’), a standard-marker (‘as’), and a standard (‘B’).
Most frequently, the parameter is the main predicate and the equative sense is expressed by a special standard-marker. But many languages also have a degree-marker, so that we get a construction of the English and French type. Another possibility is for the equality sense to be expressed by a transitive ‘equal’ (or ‘reach’) verb, which may be the main predicate or a secondary predicate. And finally, since the equative construction is semantically symmetrical, it is also possible to “unify” the parameter and the standard in the subject position (‘A and B are equally tall’, or ‘A and B are equal in height’). But no language has only a degree-marker, leaving the standard unmarked. Finally, we note some word order correlations.
2010Mauwake Reference Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David
2012Universals in Comparative Morphology Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Crane, Thera M., Hyman, Larry M. & Nsielanga Tukumu, Simon
2011A Grammar of Nzadi [B865]: A Bantu Language of Democratic Republic of Congo [University of California Publications in Linguistics 147]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Crass, Joachim
2005Das K’abeena: Deskriptive Grammatik einer hochlandostkuschitischen Sprache [Cushitic Language Studies 23]. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Curnow, Timothy
1997A Grammar of Awa Pit (Cuaiquier): An Indigenous Language of South-western Colombia. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.
Dhongde, Ramesh Vaman & Wali, Kashi
2009Marathi [London Oriental and African Languages Library 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1988A Grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
1985A Grammar of Acehnese on the Basis of a Dialect of North Aceh. [Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut Voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 112]. Dordrecht: Foris.
Faraclas, Nicholas G.
1996Nigerian Pidgin. London: Routledge.
Fleck, David W.
2003A Grammar of Matses. PhD dissertation, Rice University.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Johnston, Eric
2005A Grammar of Mina [Mouton Grammar Library 36]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goddard, Cliff & Wierzbicka, Anna
1994Introducing lexical primitives. In Semantic and Lexical Universals: Theory and Empirical Findings [Studies in Language Companion Series 25], Cliff Goddard & Anna Wierzbicka (eds), 31–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1963[1966]Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, 2nd edn, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Haspelmath, Martin
2001The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1492–1510. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Haspelmath, Martin
2010Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86 (3): 663–687.
Haspelmath, Martin & Buchholz, Oda
1998Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 277–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heath, Jeffrey
1998A Grammar of Koyra Chiini, the Songhay of Timbuktu [Mouton Grammar Library 19]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heath, Jeffrey
2005A Grammar of Tamashek (Tuareg of Mali) [Mouton Grammar Library 35]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heath, Jeffrey
2008A Grammar of Jamsay. [Mouton Grammar Library 45]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Henkelmann, Peter
2006Constructions of equative comparison. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 59 (4): 370–398.
1995Le xârâcùù langue de Thio-Canala, Nouvelle-Calédonie: Éléments de syntaxe [Langues et Cultures du Pacifique 10]. Leuven: Peeters.
Nichols, Johanna
2011Ingush Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Nikolaeva, Irina & Tolskaya, Maria
2001A Grammar of Udihe [Mouton Grammar Library 22]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nose, Masahiko
2009The expressions of comparative and similative in Oceanic and non-Oceanic languages: A typological study. Language and Linguistics of Oceania 1: 45–62
Olawsky, Knut
2006A Grammar of Urarina [Mouton Grammar Library 37]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Popjes, Jack & Popjes, Jo
1986Canela-Krahô. In Handbook of Amazonian Languages 1, Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey Pullum (eds), 128–199. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Quesada, Juan Diego
2000A Grammar of Teribe [Lincom Studies in Native American Linguistics 36]. Munich: Lincom.
Rennison, John R.
1997Koromfe. London: Routledge.
Schaub, Willi
1985Babungo. London: Croom Helm.
Selcan, Zülfü
1998Grammatik der Zaza-Sprache, Nord-Dialekt. Berlin: Wissenschaft und Technik.
Shay, Erin
2005A Grammar of East Dangla: The Simple Sentence. PhD dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder.
Stassen, Leon
1985Comparison and Universal Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stassen, Leon
2001Comparative constructions. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 993–997. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Stassen, Leon
2005Comparative constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), 490–493. Oxford: OUP. Also in WALS Online: [URL]
Stolz, Thomas
2013Competing Comparative Constructions in Europe. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Suárez, Jorge A.
1983The Mesoamerican Indian Languages. Cambridge: CUP.
Ultan, Russell
1972Some features of basic comparative constructions. Working Papers on Language Universals (Stanford) 9: 117–162.
Wali, Kashi & Koul, Omkar N.
1997Kashmiri: A Cognitive-descriptive Grammar. London: Routledge.
Wang, Peter, Hunt, Robert, McGriff, Jeff & Elkins, Richard E.
2006The Grammar of Matigsalug Manobo. Dallas TX: SIL.
Wolfenden, Elmer
1971Hiligaynon Reference Grammar. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Zeitoun, Elizabeth
2007A Grammar of Mantauran (Rukai) [Language and Linguistics Monographs A4–2]. Taipei: Academia Sinica, Institute of Linguistics.
Zigmond, Maurice L., Booth, Curtis G. & Munro, Pamela
1991Kawaiisu: A Grammar and Dictonary with Texts [University of California Publications in Linguistics 119]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Cited by
Cited by 20 other publications
Berghoff, Robyn
2020. Evaluativity in the Afrikaans Equative and Excessive Constructions. Language Matters 51:2 ► pp. 25 ff.
Bobuafor, Mercy
2021. Comparative constructions in Tafi. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 42:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
2019. Equative and similative constructions in Caijia (Sino-Tibetan). Faits de Langues 50:1 ► pp. 203 ff.
Pakendorf, Brigitte
2019. Expressing equality, similarity, and pretense in Even (Northern Tungusic, Siberia). Faits de Langues 50:1 ► pp. 91 ff.
Rose, Françoise
2019. Similar but different: the functions of the Mojeño Trinitario root expressing similarity. Faits de Langues 50:1 ► pp. 227 ff.
Sinitsyna, Julia
2023. CONSTRUCTIONS WITH THE MARKER KAD’JOS IN TATYSHLY UDMURT. Lomonosov Journal of Philology :№4, 2023 ► pp. 62 ff.
Zhang, Niina Ning
2021. Pairing Degree-WH Clauses in Mandarin. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 42:2 ► pp. 121 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.