Chapter published in:
Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony
Edited by Sonia Cristofaro and Fernando Zúñiga
[Typological Studies in Language 121] 2018
► pp. 289308
References

References

Bickel, Balthasar & Nichols, Johanna
2007Inflectional morphology. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon , Timothy Shopen (ed.), 169–240. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birchall, Joshua
2015A comparison of verbal person marking across Tupían languages. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas 10(2): 487–518.Google Scholar
Borges, Mônica Veloso
2006Aspectos fonológicos e morfossintáticos do Avá-Canoeiro (Tupi-Guarani). PhD dissertation, Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem, Unicamp, Brasil.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen
1987Politeness. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1988The diachronic dimension in explanation. In Explaining Language Universals, John A. Hawkins (ed.), 350–379. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cabral, Ana Suelly
2000Flexão relacional na família tupi-guarani. ABRALIN, Boletim da Associação Brasieira de Lingüística 25: 219–231.Google Scholar
2001O desenvolvimento da marca de objeto de segunda pessoa plural em Tupí-Guaraní. In Estudos sobre Línguas Indígenas, Vol. I, Ana Suelly Cabral & Aryon Rodrigues (eds). Belém: Universidade Federal do Pará.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2013The referential hierarchy: Reviewing the evidence in diachronic perspective. In Languages across Boundaries: Studies in the Memory of Anna Siewierska, Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 69–93. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia & Zúñiga, Fernando
2018Synchronic vs. diachronic approaches to typological hierarchies. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1981An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57: 626–657. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Lectures on functional syntax. Class given at the LSA Summer Institute, University of California at Santa Barbara. http://​www​.uoregon​.edu​/~delancey​/sb​/fs​.html
n.d. Deixis, topicality and the inverse. Ms.
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1994Ergativity [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 70], Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike
1998On Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2002Pre-Proto-Tupí-Guaraní main clause person-marking. In Línguas Indígenas Brasileiras. Fonologia, Gramática e História. Atas do I Encontro Internacional do GTLI da ANPOLL, Tomo I, Ana Suelly Cabral & Aryon Rodrigues (eds). Belem: Editoria Universitária U.F.P.A.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike & Zúñiga, Fernando
2016Referential hierarchies: A new look at some historical and typological patterns. Linguistics 54(3): 483–530.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1994The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], Talmy Givón (ed.), 3–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Syntax: A Functional-typological Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haude, Katharina & Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena
2016Referential hierarchies and alignment: An overview. Linguistics 54(3): 433–441.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1998Pragmatic skewing in 1–2 pronominal combinations in Native American Languages. IJAL 64(2): 83–104.Google Scholar
Jensen, Cheryl
1990Cross-referencing changes in some Tupí-Guaraní languages. In Amazonian Linguistics, Studies in Lowland South American Languages, Doris Payne (ed.), 117–158. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1998aComparative Tupí-Guaraní Morpho-syntax. In Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Vol. IV, Desmond Derbyshire & Geoffrey Pullum (eds), 490–603. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1998bThe use of coreferential and reflexive markers in Tupi-Guarani languages. Journal of Amazonian Languages 1(2): 1–49.Google Scholar
1999Tupí-Guaraní. In The Amazonian Languages, Vol. 5, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds), 125–163. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Junker, Marie-Odile
2011Debunking the I above You illusion: You and I and the universal person hierarchy. Liames 11: 35–50.Google Scholar
Kallfell, Guido
2010Grammatik des Jopara. Gesprochenes Guaraní und Spanisch in Paraguay. PhD dissertation, Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität, Münster.Google Scholar
Klaiman, M. H.
1991Grammatical Voice [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 59]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo & Kaburaki, Etsuko
1977Empathy and syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 8(4): 627–672.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Monica
2009On prominence hierarchies: Evidence from Algonquian. Linguistic Typology 13(3): 357–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Magalhães, Marina
2007Sobre a morfologia e a sintaxe da língua Guajá (família Tupí-Guaraní). PhD dissertation, Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1996New directions in referentiality. In Studies in Anaphora [Typological Studies in Language 33], Barbara Fox (ed.), 413–435. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Deconstruction teleology: The place of synchronic usage patterns among processes of diachronic development. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monserrat, Ruth & Soares, Marília Faco
1983Hierarquia referencial em línguas Tupi. Ensaios de Linguïstica 9: 164–187.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1992Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Doris
1994The Tupi-Guarani inverse. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara Fox & Paul Hopper (eds), 313–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas
1997Describing Morpho-syntax. A Guide for Field Linguists. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon & Cabral, Ana Suelly Arruda Câmara
2012Tupían. In South American Historical Linguistics, Lyle Campbell (ed.), 495–574. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rose, Françoise
2009A hierarchical indexation system: The example of Emerillon (Teko). In New Challenges in Typology. Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions, Patience Epps & Alexander Arkhipov (eds), 63–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2015When “you” and “I” mess around with the hierarchy: A comparative study of Tupi-Guarani hierarchical indexation systems. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas 10(2): 347–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seki, Lucy
2000Gramática do Kamaiurá. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2004Person. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Camberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena, Zakharko, Taras, Bierkandt, Lennart, Zúñiga, Fernando & Bickel, Balthasar
2016Decomposing hierarchical alignment: Co-arguments as conditions on alignment. Linguistics: 531–562.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando
2006Deixis and Alignment. Inverse Systems in Indigenous Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language 70]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando
2008How many hierarchies, really? Evidence from several Algonquian languages. In Scales, Marc Richards & Andrej Malchukov (eds), 99–129. Leipzig: University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Cristofaro, Sonia & Fernando Zúñiga
2018.  In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121],  pp. 4 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.