Part of
Nominalization in Languages of the Americas
Edited by Roberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani and David W. Fleck
[Typological Studies in Language 124] 2019
► pp. 341362
References (40)
References
Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1977. Tarma Quechua: Grammar, Texts, Dictionary. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
Adelaar, Willem F. H. & Muysken, Pieter. 2004. The languages of the Andes. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alan, C. L. 2003. Pluractionality in Chechen. Natural Language Semantics 11(3): 289–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
AQW = See Mamani et al.
Benveniste, Émile. 1970. The linguistic functions of to be and to have. In Problems in General Linguistics, Mary Elizabeth Meek (trans), 163–179. Coral Gables FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1994. Le perifrasi abituali in italiano ed in inglese. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Lingüística 8: 32–41.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Lenci, Alessandro. 2012. Habituality, pluractionality, and imperfectivity. In Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert Binnick (ed.), 852–880. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh. 1997. Obligation and possession. In Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32], Heidi Harley (ed.), 21–40. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert I. 2005. The markers of habitual aspect in English. Journal of English Linguistics 33(4): 339–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolin, Inge. 2010. Rituals of Respect: The Secret of Survival in the High Peruvian Andes. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Boneh, Nora & Doron, Edit. 2008. Habituality and the habitual aspect. In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 110], Susan Deborah Rothstein (ed.), 321–349. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Hab and Gen in the expression of habituality. In Genericity, Alda Mari, Claire Beyssade & Fabio del Prete (eds), 176–191. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1987. The aspectual nature of states and habits. Folia Linguistica 21(2–4): 195–214.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 2008. Quechumara: Estructuras paralelas de las lenguas quechua y aymara. La Paz: Centro de Investigación y Promoción del Campesinado.Google Scholar
. 2003. Lingüística Quechua. Cuzco: Centro De Estudios Regionales Andinos “Bartolomé De Las Casas”.Google Scholar
Clancy, Steven J. 2010. The Chain of Being and Having in Slavic [Studies in Language Companion Series 122]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cusihumán, Antonio G. 1976. Gramática quechua: Cuzco-Collao. Lima: Ministerio de Educación: Instituto De Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1968. Studien zur verbalen Pluralität: Iterativum, Distributivum, Durativum, Intensivum in der allgemeinen Grammatik, im Lateinischen und Hethitischen [Österr. Akad. der Wiss., Phil.-Hist. Kl., 259.1]. Wien: Hermann Böhlaus.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike. 2008. Explaining similarities between main clauses and nominalized phrases. La Structure des Langues Amazoniennes 32: 57–75.Google Scholar
GKM = See Mamani et al.
Hantson, André. 2005. The English perfect and the anti-perfect used to viewed from a comparative perspective. English Studies 86(3): 245–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hintz, Daniel J. 2007. Aspect and Aspectual Interfaces in South Conchucos Quechua: The Emergence of Grammatical Systems. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Huarochiri = See Taylor.
Isačenko, Alexander V. 1974. On have and be languages: A typological sketch. Slavic Forum: Essays in Linguistics and Literature, 43–77. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, Georges. 1987. Du côté de la référence verbale: Les phrases habituelles.Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lanata, Xavier Ricard. 2010. Annexes. Les voleurs d’ombre: l’Univers religieux des bergers de l’Ausangate, Andes centrales. Société d’ethnologie. < [URL] (4 June 2013).Google Scholar
Łęcki, Andrzej M. 2010. Grammaticalisation Paths of Have in English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mamani, Gregorio Condori, Valderrama Fernández, Ricardo & Escalante Gutiérrez, Carmen. 1983. De nosotros, los Runas: Autobiografía. Madrid: Alfaguara.Google Scholar
Mathiassen, Terje. 1996. Tense, Mood and Aspect in Lithuanian and Latvian. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo, Blavisk-baltisk avdeling.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. The tenses of verb. In Elements of Symbolic Logic, 287–298. New York NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
RXL = See Lanata.
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2002. Recent activity in the theory of aspect: Accomplishments, achievements, or just non-progressive state. Linguistic Typology 6(2): 199–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soto Ruíz, Clodoaldo. 1976. Gramática quechua: Ayacucho-Chanca. Lima: Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
Stark, Louisa Rowell. 1971. Sucre Quechua: A Pedagogical Grammar. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 2009. Predicative Possession. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gérald. 1999. Ritos y tradiciones de huarochirí. Lima: Instituto Francés de Estudios Andinos.Google Scholar
Weber, David. 1989. A Grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar