Chapter published in:
Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions
Edited by Katarzyna Janic and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
[Typological Studies in Language 130] 2021
► pp. 65–96

Chapter 3
Antipassive in the Cariban family

| University of Oklahoma
| CNRS, Laboratoire SeDyL & University of Oregon
| University of Oregon
| Universidade Federal de Roraima
To date, no published reference grammar of a Cariban language has described an antipassive construction. However, all languages of the family have a cognate verbal morpheme, termed detransitivizer, which prefixes to a transitive verb to derive an intransitive verb. While monovalent, the detransitivized verb bears inflectional person morphology that is distinct from that of non-derived intransitive verbs. We collected all available text examples of detransitivized verbs from five Cariban languages (Akawaio, Hixkaryana, Kari’nja, Tiriyó, and Ye’kwana) and categorized them into formal and functional subtypes. Alongside the well-described functions of reflexive/reciprocal/middle, anticausative, and passive, we encountered a substantial number of examples that can only be characterized as antipassive: the S of the detransitivized verb corresponds to the A of the transitive verb from which it is derived and the P of the transitive verb is either absent or expressed in an oblique (locative) PP.This paper has four goals: first, we present the detransitivized construction and explain the methodology by which we identify tokens of the construction functioning as an antipassive. Second, we present the results of our text counts – a significant number of the categorizable detransitivized tokens have the antipassive function – and we discuss why this phenomenon has been overlooked until now. Third, given that the detransitivized construction is semantically polysemous, we explore the conditions under which it has an antipassive reading, identifying one pragmatic and two semantic subtypes: Nontopical P, Semantically Absent P, and Locative P. Finally, we discuss the implications of these patterns for a diachronic typology of antipassive.
Keywords: Cariban family, antipassive, detransitivizer, valence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Cariban detransitivized construction
    • 2.1Categorizing detransitivized verbs
    • 2.2Methodological questions
  • 3.Attested types of antipassive with the detransitivizer
    • 3.1Antipassives with a nontopical P
    • 3.2A radical type of antipassive: The apatientive
    • 3.3The “locative” P
    • 3.4Idiosyncratic antipassives
  • 4.Conclusion: Is this an ‘antipassive’ and how could it become (a better) one?
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 23 March 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.03sap
References

References

Cáceres, Natalia
2011 Grammaire fonctionnelle-typologique du ye’kwana, langue caribe du Venezuela. PhD Dissertation, Lumière University Lyon 2.Google Scholar
To appear. Asymmetries in path expression in Ye’kwana. In Source and Goal (A)symmetries, Anetta Kopecka, Marine Vuillermet & Miyuki Ishibashi eds Special issue of Studies in Language
Derbyshire, Desmond C.
1965 Textos Hixkaryâna. Publicações Avulsas do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi 3. Belém, Pará: Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi.Google Scholar
1985 Hixkaryana and Linguistic Typology. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1979 Ergativity. Language 55(1): 59–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Desrey C.
2003 Zauro’nödok Akawaio yau: Variants of Akawaio Spoken at Waramadong. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
Gawne, Lauren, Kelly, Barbara F., Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L. & Heston, Tyler
2017 Putting practice into words: The state of data and methods transparency in grammatical descriptions. Language Documentation & Conservation 11: 157–189.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike
2012 Linguistic studies in the Cariban family. In Handbook of South American Languages, Lyle Campbell & Veronica Grondona (eds), 441–494. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1994 Introduction. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], Talmy Givón (ed.), 3–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2001 Syntax: An Introduction, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2011 On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15(3): 535–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, Berend J.
1968 The Carib Language. Phonology, Morphonology, Morphology, Texts and Word Index. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 Configurationality and nonconfigurationality in the Carib language of Surinam. International Journal of American Linguistics 61(4): 347–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna
2013 L’antipassif dans les langues accusatives. PhD dissertation, Lumière University Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna & Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena
2021 The multifaceted nature of antipassive constructions. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993 The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koelewijn, Cees
1984 Tarëno tamu inponopï panpira, Vol. 1. Leusden: Algemeen Diakonaal Bureau.Google Scholar
Meira, Sérgio, Gildea, Spike & Hoff, Berend J.
2010 On the origin of ablaut in the Cariban family. In Historical Linguistics in South America, Spike Gildea & Vilacy Galucio (eds). Special issue of the International Journal of American Linguistics 76(4): 474–515.Google Scholar
Meira, Sérgio
1999 A Grammar of Tiriyó. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
2000 The accidental intransitive split in the Cariban family. In Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 43], Spike Gildea (ed.), 201–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Cariban languages. In Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistic Theory, Keith Brown (ed.), 199–204. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2013 Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/108> (7 March 2017).
Sansò, Andrea
2017 Where do antipassive constructions come from? A study in diachronic typology. Diachronica 34(2): 175–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zahir, Zalmai
2018 Incipient hierarchical argument marking system from the Proto-Salish Middle in four Central Salish languages. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds), 309–342. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Cáceres Arandia, Natalia
2021. Asymmetries in Path expression in Ye’kwana. Studies in Language 45:1 ► pp. 203 ff. Crossref logo
Janic, Katarzyna
2021.  In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 249 ff. Crossref logo
Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021.  In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.