Chapter published in:
The Linguistics of Olfaction: Typological and Diachronic Approaches to Synchronic Diversity
Edited by Łukasz Jędrzejowski and Przemysław Staniewski
[Typological Studies in Language 131] 2021
► pp. 305338
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Storch, Anne
2013Linguistic expression of perception and cognition: A typological glimpse. In Perception and Cognition in Language and Culture [Brill’s Studies in Language, Cognition and Culture 3], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds), 1–46. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Avineri, Bar
2017Alternating Perception Verbs in Modern Hebrew. MA thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Barwise, Jon
1981Scenes and other situations. The Journal of Philosophy 78(7): 369–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barwise, Jon & Perry, John
1981Situations and attitudes. The Journal of Philosophy 78(11): 668–691. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bat-El, Outi
1994Stem modification and cluster transfer in Modern Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 571–593. Crossref.Google Scholar
Benedicto, Elena E.
1995(Relativized) minimality, datives, and reflexive suffixes. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 2(2): Article 3. https://​repository​.upenn​.edu​/pwpl​/vol2​/iss2​/3 (19 February 2019).Google Scholar
Brook, Marisa
2014Comparative complementizers in Canadian English: Insights from early fiction. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20(2): Article 2. https://​repository​.upenn​.edu​/pwpl​/vol20​/iss2​/2 (16 October 2017).Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Corpus of Modern Yiddish (CMY)
Cusic, David Dowell
1981Verbal Plurality and Aspect. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Dalmatzky-Fischler, Brakha
2000Agnon, yalon ve-tur ha-lašon: šiquley ha-sop̄er, ha-balšan ve-ha-poseq be-sugiyat ha-normatiḇiyut (Agnon, Yalon and the language column: The arguments of the author, the linguist and the arbiter in normative issue). In Raphael Nir Jubilee Book: Studies in Communication, Linguistics and Language Teaching, Ora R. Schwarzwald, Shoshana Blum-Kulka & Elite Olshtain (eds), 144–165. Jerusalem: Carmel.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. & Hengeveld, Kees
1991The hierarchical structure of the clause and the typology of perception verb complements. Linguistics 29(2): 231–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Digonnet, Rémi
2018The linguistic expression of smells: From lack to abundance? In Sensory Perceptions in Language, Embodiment and Epistemology [Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics 42], Annalisa Baicchi, Rémi Digonnet & Jodi L. Sandford (eds), 177–191. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doron, Edit
2003Agency and voice: The semantics of the Semitic templates. Natural Language Semantics 11(1): 1–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Trumato šel ha-binyan le-mašma’ut ha-po’al (The contribution of the template to verb meaning). In Theoretical Hebrew Linguistics, Galia Hatav (ed.), 57–88. Jerusalem: Magnes Press. http://​pluto​.huji​.ac​.il​/~edit​/edit​/TS​.pdf (3 December 2016).Google Scholar
2016Introduction. In Language Contact and the Development of Modern Hebrew, Edit Doron (ed.), 1–22. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, Fred I.
1969Seeing and Knowing. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Egré, Paul
2008Question-embedding and factivity. Grazer Philosophische Studien 77(1): 85–125. https://​jeannicod​.ccsd​.cnrs​.fr​/ijn​_00226386 (20 August 2018). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Even-Shoshan, Abraham
1977–1980Qonqordancia xadaša le-tora, neḇi’im u-ktuḇim: ‘ocar lešon ha-miqra – ‘iḇrit va-’aramit; šorašim, milim, šemot pratiim, cerup̄im ve-nirdap̄im ( A New Concordance of the Bible: Thesaurus of the Language of the Bible, Hebrew and Aramaic, Roots, Words, Proper Names, Phrases and Synonyms). Jerusalem: Kiryat Sefer.Google Scholar
Gadish, Ronit
2007Darḵey ha-haba’a šel šem ha-to’ar le-ciun ha-’ep̄šarut: ‘iyun be-ma’agar ha-munaxim šel ha-’aqademia u-ḇa-milonut ha-’iḇrit (The adjectival ways of expressing possibility: A study of the glossary of the Hebrew Academy and of Hebrew lexicography). In Sha’arei Lashon. Studies in Hebrew, Aramaic and Jewish Languages Presented to Moshe Bar-Asher, Vol. 3: Modern Hebrew and the Jewish Languages, Aharon Maman, Steven E. Fassberg & Yochanan Breuer (eds), 71–85. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Yael
2010Event internal pluractionality in Modern Hebrew: A semantic analysis of one verbal reduplication pattern. Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 2(1): 119–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, David
2014Sus ‘exad niḵnas le-bar ( A Horse Walks into a Bar). Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishing Group / Siman Kria Books.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James
1983The logic of perceptual reports: An extensional alternative to situation semantics. The Journal of Philosophy 80(2): 100–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Historical Dictionary Project of the Hebrew Language
Historical Jewish Press
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide
1997Smelling and perception: A cross-linguistic study. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 612: 113–121.Google Scholar
1999Metaphorical mapping in the sense of smell. In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Raymond W. GibbsJr. & Gerard J. Steen (eds), 29–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1940[1961] A Modern English Grammar. On Historical Principles, Part V: Syntax, Fourth Volume. London: Allen & Unwin, Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kaddari, Menahem Zevi
2006Milon ha-’iḇrit ha-miqra’it: ‘osar lešon ha-Miqra’ me-Alef ‘ad Taw ( A Dictionary of Biblical Hebrew). Ramat-Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri
1970On the semantics of complement sentences. In Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 6: 328–340.Google Scholar
1971Implicative verbs. Language 47(2): 340–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kastner, Itamar
2015Factivity mirrors interpretation: The selectional requirements of presuppositional verbs. Lingua 164( A ): 156–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Kiparsky, Carol
1970Fact. In Progress in Linguistics. A Collection of Papers, Manfred Bierwisch & Karl Erlich Heidolph (eds), 143–173. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirsner, Robert S. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1976The role of pragmatic inference in semantics: A study of sensory verb complements in English. Glossa 10(2): 200–240.Google Scholar
Kratschmer, Alexandra Regina
2013The witness wins it all. The interplay of evidentiality, factivity and event type: The German conjunction wie ‘how’ following verbs of perception. Sprache und Sprachen 45: 32–54.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1995Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In The Generic Book, Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds), 125–175. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1996Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33], Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Situations in natural language. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://​plato​.stanford​.edu​/archives​/fall2008​/entries​/situations​-semantics/ (11 October 2008).Google Scholar
Krawczyk, Elizabeth Allyn
2012Inferred Propositions and the Expression of the Evidence relation in natural language: Evidentiality in Central Alaskan Yupik Eskimo and English. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University. http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/10822​/557713 (9 October 2018).
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Heycock, Caroline
1988Bare infinitives and external arguments. The Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 18: 271–285.Google Scholar
Kuzar, Ron
1991Psuqiyot nominalizacia ba-’iḇrit ha-isra’elit (Nominalized clauses in Israeli Hebrew). Hebrew Linguistics 36: 71–89.Google Scholar
Kyrk, Barbara
1979How factive are see, hear and feel and their Polish counterparts? Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 9: 147–164.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2011Predication vs. aboutness in copy raising. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 779–813. Crossref.Google Scholar
Lasersohn, Peter Nathan
1995Sounds like like . Linguistic Analysis 25: 70–77.Google Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne
2010On how how is used instead of that . Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28(1): 121–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marušič, Franc & Rok, Žaucer
2006On the intensional feel-like construction in Slovenian: A case of a phonologically null verb. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24(4): 1093–1159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matushansky, Ora
2002Tipping the scales: The syntax of scalarity in the complement of seem . Syntax 5(3): 219–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, Clemens
2019Triviality and interrogative embedding: Context sensitivity, factivity and neg-raising. Natural Language Semantics 27(3): 227–278. Crossref
Mittwoch, Anita
2005Do states have Davidsonian arguments? Some empirical considerations. In Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications, Claudia Maienborn & Angelika Wöllstein-Leisten (eds), 69–87. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, Keir
2009Natural Selection and the Syntax of Clausal Complementation. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts. https://​scholarworks​.umass​.edu​/open​_access​_dissertations​/99/ (2 May 2017).
Nye, Rachel
2013Rethinking the distribution of English finite clausal complements. Evidence from complementizer-how clauses. Linguistics in the Netherlands 30: 119–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders
1934Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 5, Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss (eds). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Ruvik
2006Milon ha-sleng ha-maqip̄ (Dictionary of Israeli Slang), (4th edn). Jerusalem: Keter Books.Google Scholar
Sadan, Dov
1956Aḇney sap̄a (Language Building Blocks). Tel Aviv: Am Oved.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila, Kendrick, Kobin H., Norcliffe, Elisabeth & Majid, Asifa
2018Universal meaning extensions of perception verbs are grounded in interaction. Cognitive Linguistics 29(3): 371–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Savchenko, Ulyana
2014Second Language Acquisition of Russian Applicative Experiencers. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
Saydon, Vered
2009Ra’a, šama ve-hirgiš: mi-tp̄isa xušit li-tp̄isa siḵlit. ‘iyun taxbiri-semanti be-’iḇrit bat zmanenu (From physical to mental perception: A semantic and syntactic study of Contemporary Hebrew). Lĕšonénu: A Journal for the Study of the Hebrew Language and Cognate Subjects 71(1–2): 369–399.Google Scholar
Spector, Benjamin & Égré, Paul.
2015 A uniform semantics for embedded interrogatives: An answer, not necessarily the answer. Synthese 192(6): 1729–1784. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Methaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54]. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van ValinJr., Robert D.
1993 A synopsis of role and reference grammar. In Advances in Role and Reference Grammar [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 82], Robert D. Van ValinJr. (ed.), 1–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref.Google Scholar
2004Semantic macroroles in role and reference grammar. In Semantische Rollen, Rolf Kailuweit & Martin Hummel (eds), 62–82. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke
1983The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics 21(1): 123–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Swedish verbs of perception from a typological and contrastive perspective. In Languages and Cultures in Contrast and Comparison [ Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 175], María de los ÁngelesGómez González, J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Elsa M. González Álvarez (eds), 123–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yalon, Hanoch
1971Pirqe lašon (Studies of the Hebrew Language). Jerusalem: Bialik Institute.Google Scholar