Chapter published in:
Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology
Edited by Luca Alfieri, Giorgio Francesco Arcodia and Paolo Ramat
[Typological Studies in Language 132] 2021
► pp. 101136
Beeching, Kate
1980–1990Un corpus d’entretiens spontanés. Enregistrés et transcrits par Kate Beeching. Southampton: LLAS Centre for Languages, University of Southampton.Google Scholar
Corpus of Contemporary American English.
Cohen, David
1989L’aspect verbal. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1985Tense. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
1991Gender. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Number. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuyckens, Herbert , Davidse, Kristin & Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
(eds.) 2010Grammaticalization and grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
2010Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 1: Methodology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2010Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 2: Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 3: Further Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1991SOV languages and the OV: VO typology. Journal of Linguistics 27: 443–482. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68(1): 81–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order. In Word Order in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 30], Michael Noonan & Pamela Downing (eds), 105–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013aDefinite articles. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/37 (28 May 2017).Google Scholar
2013bIndefinite articles. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/38 (28 May 2017).Google Scholar
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud
1989Word frequency and word order in freezes. Linguistics 27(3): 517–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud & Fenk, August
2005Crosslinguistic correlations between size of syllables, number of cases, and adposition order. In Sprache und Natürlichkeit: Gedenkband für Willi Mayerthaler, Gertraud Fenk-Oczlon & Christian Winkler (eds), 75–86. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1968The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, Emmon Bach & Richard, Harms (eds), 1–88. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael, Mithun, Marianne & Evans, Nicholas
(eds) 2017The Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
1985aErgativity, number, and agreement. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Mary Niepokuj, Mary VanClay, Vassiliki Nikiforidou & Deborah Feder (eds), 96–106. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
1985bTruth and the indicative sentence. Studies in Language 9(2): 243–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987Truth and the compositionality principle: A reply to Palmer. Studies in Language 11(1): 211–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Grammaticalization of the Complex Sentence: A Case Study in Chadic [Studies in Language Companion Series 32]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Grammaticalization of number: From demonstratives to nominal and verbal plural. Linguistic Typology 1: 193–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999Domains of point of view and coreferentiality: System interaction approach to the study of reflexives. In Reflexives: Forms and Functions, Vol.1 [Typological Studies in Language 40], Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci Walker (eds), 125–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001A Grammar of Lele [Stanford Monographs in African Linguistics]. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2004Principle of functional transparency in language structure and language change. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 72], Zygmunt Frajzyngier, David Rood & Adam Hodges (eds), 259–283. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008aA Grammar of Gidar. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2008bGrammaticalization, typology, and semantics: Expanding the agenda. In Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 76], Maria Jose Lopez-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds), 61–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Grammaticalization within and outside of the domain. In Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research [Typological Studies in Language 94], An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Kristin Davidse (eds), 43–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Grammaticalization of the reference systems. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 625–635. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012A Grammar of Wandala. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Indirect object and benefactive predications in Chadic: A typological sketch. Studies in African Linguistics 42(1): 33–68.Google Scholar
2016Inflectional markers of sentential parsing. Lingua 183: 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018aToward a typology of reference systems. Languages and Linguistics 79: 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018bCoding locative predication in Chadic. In Afroasiatic: Data and Perspectives [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 339], Alessandro Mengozzi & Mauro Tosco (eds), 203–233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019What the grammaticalization of ‘head’ reveals about the semantic structure of a language. In Embodiment in Cross-Linguistic Studies: The ‘Head’, Iwona Kraska-Szlenk (ed.), 51–75. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Butters, Marielle
2020The Emergence of Grammatical Functions. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, Johnston, Eric, with Edwards, Adrian
2005A Grammar of Mina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, Liu, Meichun, Ye, Yingying
2020The reference system of Modern Mandarin Chinese. Australian Journal of Linguistics 40(1). Crossref. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Mycielski, Jan
1998On some fundamental problems of mathematical linguistics. In Mathematical and Computational Analysis of Natural Language [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 45], Carlos Martin-Vide (ed.), 295–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt with Shay, Erin
2002A Grammar of Hdi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt with Erin Shay
2003Explaining Language Structure through Systems Interaction [Typological Studies in Language 55]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016The Role of Functions in Syntax: A Unified Approach to Language Theory, Description, and Typology [Typological Studies in Language 111]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Munkaila, Mohammed
In progressLocative predications in Hausa.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
n.d. Field-notes on Hona.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Johnston, Eric
n.d. Field-notes for Mina dictionary.
Garrigues-Cresswell, Martine with Weibegué, Christophe
1981Livre de Lecture Lélé. Sarh: Centre D’études Linguistiques.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & van der Auwera, Johan
2012This is to count as a construction. Folia Linguistica 46(1): 109–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granger, Gilles Gaston
1960Pensée Formelle et Science de l’Homme. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1963Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Grammar, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine
2016Associated motion in South America: Typological and areal perspectives. Linguistic Typology 20(1): 81–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2010Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15(3): 535–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang & Perdue, Clive
1997The Basic Variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13(4): 301–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Heine, Bernd, Hong, Bo, Long, Haiping, Narrog, Heiko & Rhee, Seongha
(eds) 2019World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, second, extensively revised and updated edition. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
2004On the status of linguistics with particular regard to typology. The Linguistic Review 21: 389–411. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Margetts, Anna & Austin, Peter K.
2007Three-participant events in the languages of the world: Towards a crosslinguistic typology. Linguistics 45(3): 393–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milewski, Tadeusz
1950La structure de la phrase dans les langues indigènes de l’Amérique du nord. Lingua Posnaniensis 2: 162–207.Google Scholar
1962Typological similarities between Caucasian and American Indian languages. Folia Orientalia IV: 221–230.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1991Active/agentive case and its motivations. Language 67: 510–546. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne & Chafe, Wallace
1999What are S, A, and O? Studies in Language 23(3): 579–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Paul
2000The Hausa Language: An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
NKJP: Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego-Polish National Corpus
Radetzky, Paula & Smith, Tomoko
2010An areal and cross-linguistic study of benefactive and malefactive constructions. In Benefactives and Malefactives. Typological Perspectives and Case Studies [Typological Studies in Language 92], Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds), 97–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul & Otanes, Fe T.
1972Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, Russell G.
2017A Chadic Cornucopia, Paul Newman (ed.). Oakland CA: California Digital Library. https://​escholarship​.org​/uc​/uclaling​_chadic (12 November 2020).Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2006Word order and linearization. In Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics, Vol. 13, Keith Brown (ed.), 642–649. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Variation in major constituent order: A global and European perspective. In Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe, Anna Siewierska (ed.), 475–552. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Person. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna & Bakker, Dik
1996The distribution of subject and object agreement and word order type. Studies in Language 20(1): 115–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanini, Jean
1962La voix pronominale en ancien et en moyen français. Aix-en-Provence: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1963Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wohlgemuth, Jan & Cysouw, Michael
(eds) 2010Rara & Rarissima. Documenting the Fringes of Linguistic Diversity. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar