Article published in:
Insights in Translation for Specific Purposes: Special issue of Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 2:1 (2016)
Edited by Antonella d’Angelis, Estefanía Flores Acuña and Francisco Núñez-Román
[Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 2:1] 2016
► pp. 124–141

Cognition and metaphor as bases for the Principle of translatability and the Principle of synonymy

| University of Seville (Spain)

The problem of equivalence in translation is sometimes falsely related to the translation of lexical meanings. In this paper we take the problem to the field of mapping cognitive functions among mental categories and their representations as concepts. This requires engaging all lexical and grammatical resources of the linguistic system and not solely considering vocabulary as the source of knowledge and information found in texts, be they oral or written. Thus, the problem of equivalence is solved by accepting the basic principles of translatability and synonymy, defined in terms of those mental contents that are behind the interpretation of complex linguistic expressions.

Keywords: principle of synonymy, concepts as metaphor, principle of translatability, cognitive schemas, cognition
Published online: 21 June 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ttmc.2.1.07sal
References
Chomsky, Noam
1986 Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
1988 Language and Problems of Knowledge. The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Stephen Matthews, and Maria Polinsky
1996 The Atlas of Languages: The Origin and Development of Languages Throughout the World. New York: Facts on File.Google Scholar
Croft, William, and D. Allan Cruse
2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruse, D. Allan
1986 Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004 Meaning in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1984 Espaces mentaux. Aspects de la construction du sens dans les langues naturelles. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.Google Scholar
Gershkoff-Stow, Lisa, and David H. Rakinson
2009 Building Object Categories in Developmental Time. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
2002 “The Search for the Shared Semantic Core of all Languages.” In Meaning and Universal Grammar — Theory and Empirical Findings, Volume I1, ed. by Cliff Goddard and Anna Wierzbicka, 5–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, Douglas
2001 “Analogy as the Core of Cognition.” In The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, ed. by Dedre Gentner, Keith J. Holyoak, and Boicho N. Kokinov, 499–538. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press/Bradford Book.Google Scholar
Hohulin, E. Lou
1986 “The Absence of Lexical Equivalence and Cases of its Asimmetry.” Lexicographica 21: 43–52.Google Scholar
Kanerva, Pentti
1988 Sparse Distributed Memory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, Robert
1986 Translation Determined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Murray, David
1991 Forked Tongues. Speech, Writing and Representation in North American Indian Texts. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Sager, Juan Carlos
2012 La traducción especializada: Teoría y práctica profesional. Córdoba/Sevilla: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Córdoba — Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard van Orman
1960 Word and Object. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee
1956 Language, Thought and Reality. Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1996 Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar