Article published in:
Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 2] 2015
► pp. 211286
References
LKVJŽ: Nijolė Sližienė 2004Lietuvių kalbos veiksmažodžių junglumo žodynas, vol. 1–3. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas.Google Scholar

2. Polish

Multimedialny słownik szkolny języka polskiego (MSSJP)
Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego (NKJP)
Słownik języka polskiego
(edited by W. Doroszewski, SJPDor)
Uniwersalny słownik języka polskiego (USJP)
Apresjan, Jurij D
1995 [1974]Leksičeskaja semantika. Sinonimičeskie sredstva jazyka [Lexical Semantics. Synonymic Means of Language]. Moskva: Škola “Jazyki russkoj kul’tury” / Izdatel’skaja firma “Vostočnaja literatura” RAN. [= Ju. D. Apresjan. 1974. Izbrannye trudy, t. I. Revised version of first edition. Moscow]Google Scholar
. 22000Semantyka leksykalna (synonimiczne środki języka). Wrocław etc.: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. [Polish translation of Apresjan (1995 [1974], translated by Z. Kozłowska and A. Markowski.]Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter, Axel Holvoet & Björn Wiemer
2015. Introduction. Baltic Linguistics: State of the Art. In Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics, Peter Arkadiev, Axel Holvoet & Björn Wiemer (eds) 1 109 Berlin, New York De Gruyter Mouton
Bresnan, Joan
2001Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cann, Ronnie
2011Sense relations. In Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), vol. 1, 456–479. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1991Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W
1998Event Structure in Argument Linking. In The Projection of Arguments. Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 21–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2012Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan
1986Lexical semantics. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 22004Meaning in Language. An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C
. 21997The Theory of Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67 (3): 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J
1977The case for case reopened. In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 8: Grammatical Relations, Peter Cole & Jerrold M. Sadock (eds), 59–91. New York etc.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Ernst
1929Syntax der litauischen Postpositionen und Präpositionen. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
2010Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma
1987The Typology of Reflexives. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Reciprocal and reflexive constructions in Lithuanian (with references to Latvian). In Typology of Reciprocal Constructions, Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed), vol. 2, 633–672. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goto, Ksenija V. & Sergej S. Saj
2009Častotnye xarakteristiki klassov russkix refleksivnyx glagolov [Frequency properties of reflexice verb classes in Russian]. In Korpusnye issledovanija po russkoj grammatike, K. L.Kiseleva, V.A. Plungjan, E.V. Raxilina & S.G. Tatevosov (eds), 184–223. Moskva: Probel-2000.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane B
1990Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grochowski, Maciej
1982Zarys leksykologii i leksykografii. Zagadnienia synchroniczne [Outline of Lexicology and Lexicography. Synchronic Issues]. Toruń: Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2003The geometry of grammatical meaning: semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language, Michael Tomasello (ed), vol. 2, 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
1986Struktury inaktywne w języku polskim [Inactive structures in Polish]. Polonica 12: 117–125.Google Scholar
1991Transitivity and Clause Structure in Polish. A Study in Case Marking. Warszawa: Slawistyczny Ośrodek Wydawniczy.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993The Middle Voice. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knjazev, Jurij P
2007Grammatičeskaja semantika. Russkij jazyk v tipologičeskoj perspektive [Grammatical Semantics. Russian in a Typological Perspective]. Moskva: Jazyki slavjanskix kul’tur.Google Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian
2002Understanding Semantics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Lutzeier, Peter R
1985Die semantische Struktur des Lexikons. In Handbuch der Lexikologie, Christoph Schwarze & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 103–133. Königstein/Taunus: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Heiko Narrog
2011Case polysemy. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 518–534. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maskaliūnienė, Nijolė
1989Leksičeskie konversivy v litovskom jazyke [Lexical Converses in Lithuanian]. Unpublished PhD thesis. Vilnius.Google Scholar
2015. Morphological, syntactic and semantic types of converse verbs in Lithuanian. In Peter Arkadiev, Axel Holvoet & Björn Wiemer (eds) Contemporary Approaches in Baltic Linguistics 349 381 Berlin, Boston De Gruyter Mouton
Musteikis, Kazys [Kazis Mustejkis]
1972Sopostavitel’naja morfologija russkogo i litovskogo jazykov [Contrastive Morphology of Russian and Lithuanian]. Vilnius: Mintis.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2007Prototypical Transitivity. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagórko, Alicja
2007Lexikologie des Polnischen. Hildesheim, Zürich, New York: Olms.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P
2007Overview of the research (Definitions of terms, framework, and related issues). In Reciprocal constructions, Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), vol. 1, 3–114. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padučeva, Elena V
2001Kauzativnyj glagol i dekauzativ v russkom jazyke [Causatives and decausatives in Russian]. Russkij jazyk v naučnom osveščenii 1 (1): 52–79.Google Scholar
Padučeva, Elena V. & Raisa I. Rozina
1993Semantičeskij klass glagolov polnogo oxvata: tolkovanie i leksiko-sintaksičeskie svojstva [The semantic class of holistic verbs: explication and lexico-semantic properties]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1993 (6): 5–16.Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice
2009Case, grammatical relations, and semantic roles. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 261–275. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roelcke, Thorsten
2002Paradigmatische Relationen der Exklusion und Opposition III: Konversivität. In Lexikologie / Lexicology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wörtern und Wortschätzen / An International Handbook on the Nature and Structure of Words and Vocabularies, D. Alan Cruse, Franz Hundsnurscher, Michael Job & Rolf Peter Lutzeier (eds), vol. 1, 511–517. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M.W. Dixon (ed), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Solstad, Torgrim & Benjamin Lyngfelt
2006Perspectives on demotion (Introduction to the volume). In Demoting the Agent. Passive, middle and other voice phenomena, Benjamin Lyngfelt & Torgrim Solstad (eds), 1–20. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Šukys, Jonas
1998Lietuvių kalbos linksniai ir prielinksniai: vartosena ir normos [Cases and Prepositions in Lithuanian: usage and norms]. Kaunas: Šviesa.Google Scholar
Testelec, Jakov G
2001Vvedenie v obščij sintaksis [Introduction to General Syntax]. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo RGGU.Google Scholar
Usonienė, Aurelija [Aurelia Usoniene]
2001On direct/indirect perception with verbs of seeing and seeming in English and Lithuanian. Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics: Working Papers 48: 163–182.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr
2005Exploring the Syntax-Semantic Interface. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn
1999The light and the heavy form of the Polish reflexive pronoun and their role in diathesis. In Beiträge der Europäischen Slavistischen Linguistik (POLYSLAV) 2 (Die Welt der Slaven, Sammelbände 4), Katharina Böttger, Markus Giger & Björn Wiemer (eds), 300–313. München: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
2004The evolution of passives as grammatical constructions in Northern Slavic and Baltic languages. In What makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 271–331. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Relations between Actor-demoting devices in Lithuanian. In Passivization and Typology. Form and Function, Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds), 274–309. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Reciprocal and reflexive constructions in Polish. In Typology of Reciprocal Constructions, Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed), vol. 2, 514–559. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Widać und słychać: zum Schicksal zweier erstarrter Infinitive. In Von grammatischen Kategorien und sprachlichen Weltbildern – Die Slavia von der Sprachgeschichte bis zur Politsprache. Festschrift für Daniel Weiss zum 60. Geburtstag (Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 73), Tilman Berger, Markus Giger, Sibylle Kurt & Imke Mendoza (eds), 615–632. München, Wien, Berlin: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. On the rise, establishment and continued development of subject impersonals in Polish, East Slavic and Baltic. In Diachronic Typology of Voice and Valency-Changing Categories, Seppo Kittilä & Leonid Kulikov (eds) Amsterdam, Philadelphia John Benjamins
Wilczewska, Krystyna
1966Czasowniki zwrotne we współczesnej polszczyźnie [Reflexive Verbs in Contemporary Polish]. Toruń: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

No author info given
2020.  In The Middle Voice in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 5], Crossref logo
Holvoet, Axel
2018. On so-called converse reflexives in Slavic and Baltic. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 63:3  pp. 373 ff. Crossref logo
Wiemer, Björn & Vaiva Žeimantienė
2016.  In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3],  pp. 259 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 september 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.