Article published in:
The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and beyond
Edited by Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber and Alexander Kautzsch
[Varieties of English Around the World G49] 2014
► pp. 126–141

The Evolution of Singlish: Beyond Phase 5?

This paper focuses on the development of Singlish and shows that the study of Singlish provides us with useful information about how the development of (varieties of) English is related to issues of language, identity and culture in a rapidly globalizing world. As such, it raises the important question of how the issue of global mobility (of people as well as cultural – including linguistic – products) can be linked to Schneider’s Dynamic Model. The basic assumptions of the Dynamic Model, the paper argues, will need to be reconsidered if it is to keep pace with the sociolinguistic implications of globalization.
Keywords: commodification, double hermeneutic;, globalization, late modernity;, migration
Published online: 12 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g49.08wee
References
Agha, A.
2011 Commodity registers. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21(1): 22–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Z.
2007 Consuming Life. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Block, D., Gray, J. & Holborow, M.
(eds) 2012 Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J.
2010 The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J.
(ed.) 1999 Language Ideological Debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bokhorst-Heng, W.
2005 Debating Singlish. Multilingua 24(3): 185–209.Google Scholar
Brown-Saracino, J.
2009 A Neighborhood that Never Changes. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruthiaux, P.
2010 The Speak Good English Movement: A web-user’s perspective. In English in Singapore: Modernity and Management, L. Lim, A. Pakir & L. Wee (eds), 91–108. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Budach, G., Roy, S. & Heller, M.
2003 Community and commodity in French Ontario. Language in Society 32(5): 603–627. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chng, H.H.
2003 ‘You see me no up’: Is Singlish a problem? Language Problems & Language Planning 27(1): 45–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N.
2007 Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faist, T.
2000 The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García, O.
2009 Bilingual Education in the 21st Century: A Global Perspective. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Giddens, A.
1987 Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D.
2005 A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, M.
2008 Language and the nation-state: Challenges to sociolinguistic theory. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 504–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, J.N.
2008 Polylingual languaging around and among children and adolescents. International Journal of Multilingualism 5(3): 161–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keat, R., Whiteley, N. & Abercrombie, N.
(eds) 1994 The Authority of the Consumer. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kong, L.
1999 Globalization and Singaporean transmigration: Re-imagining and negotiating national identity. Political Geography 18(5): 563–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Makoni, S. & Pennycook, A.
(eds) 2007 Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ong, A.
2006 Neoliberalism as Exception. Durham: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Otsuji, E. & Pennycook, A.
2010 Metrolingualism: Fixity, fluidity and language in flux. International Journal of Multilingualism 7(3): 240–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B.
1995 Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2006 Language in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubdy, R.
2001 Creative destruction: Singapore’s Speak Good English Movement. World Englishes 20(3): 341–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, M.J.
2012 What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York NY: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
Schneider, E.W.
2007 Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
The Online Citizen
2010 Please stop hum-tumming Singlish! Just leebit alone! 17 September 2010. <http://​theonlinecitizen​.com​/2010​/09​/“please​-stop​-hum​-tumming​-singlish​-just​-leebit​-alone”> (15 October 2012).
Weber, J.-J. & Horner, K.
2012 Introducing Multilingualism: A Social Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wee, L.
2011 Metadiscursive convergence in the Singlish debate. Language & Communication 31(1): 75–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Language policy in Singapore: Singlish, national development and globalization. In English and Development, E. Erling & P. Seargeant (eds), 204–19. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
2014. Linguistic chutzpah and the Speak Good Singlish Movement. World Englishes 33(1): 85–99. Crossref
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Schneider, Edgar W.
2014. Asian Englishes – into the future: a bird’s eye view. Asian Englishes 16:3 ► pp. 249 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.