Cover not available
Part of
The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and beyond
Edited by Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber and Alexander Kautzsch
[Varieties of English Around the World G49] 2014
► pp. 448–469

Lexical creativity reconsidered

GUI, cyborg, cred, pay-per-view, techno and cyber-

The present study complements and modifies Fischer (1998), who analyzed creative neologisms in the British newspaper The Guardian 1991–1996 and established a general model of lexical institutionalization. First, we will present and discuss relevant research in cognitive linguistics. Secondly, we will consider various corpus-based studies about neologisms published from the 1990s onwards, particularly about meaning cues and the life-cycle of neologisms. In an empirical part, we will then investigate novel coinages and constituents in the London Guardian from the 1980s until 2012, including the combining forms techno- and cyber-, whose productivity will be measured and compared as well. The findings allow a re-evaluation of the factors involved in the institutionalization process.
Keywords: corpus linguistics, institutionalization, lexical change, neologism, productivity, word-formation
Published online: 12 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g49.26fis
References (33)
Aitchison, J. 2012. Words in the Mind. An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Aitchison, J. & Lewis, D. 1995. How to handle wimps: Incorporating new lexical items as an adult. Folia Linguistica 29(1–2): 7–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, H. 1993. On frequency, transparency and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1992, G.E. Booij & J. van Marle (eds), 181–208. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, H. & Lieber, R. 1991. Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics 29(5): 801–843. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. 1985. Morphology. A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowie, C.S. 2006. Economical with the truth: Register categories and the functions of ‘-wise’ viewpoint adverbs in the British National Corpus. ICAME Journal 30: 5–36.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. 2002. The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. 1998. Lexical Change in Present-day English. A Corpus-based Study of the Motivation, Institutionalization, and Productivity of Creative Neologisms. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gries, S.Th. 2009. Statistics for Linguistics with R. A Practical Introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jescheniak, J.D. 2002. Sprachproduktion. Der Zugriff auf das lexikale Gedächtnis beim Sprechen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Kemmer, S. 2003. Schemas and lexical blends. In Motivation in Language. Studies in Honor of Günter Radden, H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven & K.-U. Panther (eds), 69–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lampert, M. & Lampert, G. 2010. Word-formation or word formation? The formation of complex words in cognitive linguistics. In Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation, A. Onysko & S. Michel (eds), 29–73. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
LexisNexis. [URL] (15 October 2013).
Levelt, W.J.M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mühleisen, S. 2010. Heterogeneity in Word-formation Patterns. A Corpus-based Analysis of Suffixation with ‘-ee’ and its Productivity in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 118]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary online. [URL] (15 October 2013).
Plag, I. 1999. Morphological Productivity. Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, I., Dalton-Puffer, Ch. & Baayen, R. 1999. Morphological productivity across speech and writing. English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 209–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renouf, A. 2007. Tracing lexical productivity and creativity in the British media: The chavs and the chav-nots? In Lexical Creativity, Texts and Contexts [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 58], J. Munat (ed.), 61–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Defining neology to meet the needs of the translator: A corpus-based study. Neologica. Revue International de Néologie 6: 17–41.Google Scholar
. 2013. A finer definition of neology in English: The life-cycle of a word. In Corpus Perspectives on Patterns of Lexis [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 57], H. Hasselgård, J. Ebeling & S. Oksefjell Ebeling (eds), 177–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Renouf, A. & Bauer, L. 2000. Contextual clues to word-meaning. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 5(2): 231–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Säily, T. 2011. Variation in morphological productivity in the BNC: Sociolinguistic and methodological considerations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7(1): 119–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. 2008. New words in the mind: Concept-formation and entrenchment of neologisms. Anglia 126(1): 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. English Morphology and Word-formation. An Introduction. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Schröder, A. 2011. On the Productivity of Verbal Prefixation in English. Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Trips, C. 2009. Lexical Semantics and Diachronic Morphology. The Development of -hood, dom and -ship in the History of English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, F. 1999. Iconicity in word-formation. In Form Miming Meaning [Iconicity in Language and Literature 1], M. Nänny & O. Fischer (eds), 307–324. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Arbitrarität, Ikonizität und Motivation. In Lexikologie / Lexicology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wörtern und Wortschätzen. / International Handbook on the Nature and Structure of Words and Vocabularies, Vol. 1, D.A. Cruse, F. Hundsnurscher, M. Job & P.R. Lutzeier (eds), 371–380. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2007. Word-formation. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (eds), 650–675. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.