Article published in:
The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and beyond
Edited by Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber and Alexander Kautzsch
[Varieties of English Around the World G49] 2014
► pp. 448–469

Lexical creativity reconsidered

GUI, cyborg, cred, pay-per-view, techno and cyber-

The present study complements and modifies Fischer (1998), who analyzed creative neologisms in the British newspaper The Guardian 1991–1996 and established a general model of lexical institutionalization. First, we will present and discuss relevant research in cognitive linguistics. Secondly, we will consider various corpus-based studies about neologisms published from the 1990s onwards, particularly about meaning cues and the life-cycle of neologisms. In an empirical part, we will then investigate novel coinages and constituents in the London Guardian from the 1980s until 2012, including the combining forms techno- and cyber-, whose productivity will be measured and compared as well. The findings allow a re-evaluation of the factors involved in the institutionalization process.
Keywords: corpus linguistics, institutionalization, lexical change, neologism, productivity, word-formation
Published online: 12 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g49.26fis
References
Aitchison, J.
2012 Words in the Mind. An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Aitchison, J. & Lewis, D.
1995 How to handle wimps: Incorporating new lexical items as an adult. Folia Linguistica 29(1–2): 7–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, H.
1993 On frequency, transparency and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1992, G.E. Booij & J. van Marle (eds), 181–208. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, H. & Lieber, R.
1991 Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics 29(5): 801–843. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L.
2001 Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J.
1985 Morphology. A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, C.S.
2006 Economical with the truth: Register categories and the functions of ‘-wise’ viewpoint adverbs in the British National Corpus. ICAME Journal 30: 5–36.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M.
2002 The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fischer, R.
1998 Lexical Change in Present-day English. A Corpus-based Study of the Motivation, Institutionalization, and Productivity of Creative Neologisms. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gries, S.Th
2009 Statistics for Linguistics with R. A Practical Introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jescheniak, J.D.
2002 Sprachproduktion. Der Zugriff auf das lexikale Gedächtnis beim Sprechen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Kemmer, S.
2003 Schemas and lexical blends. In Motivation in Language. Studies in Honor of Günter Radden, H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven & K.-U. Panther (eds), 69–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lampert, M. & Lampert, G.
2010 Word-formation or word formation? The formation of complex words in cognitive linguistics. In Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation, A. Onysko & S. Michel (eds), 29–73. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
LexisNexis
<http://​www​.lexisnexis​.com> (15 October 2013).
Levelt, W.J.M.
1989 Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mühleisen, S.
2010 Heterogeneity in Word-formation Patterns. A Corpus-based Analysis of Suffixation with ‘-ee’ and its Productivity in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 118]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary online
<www​.oed​.com> (15 October 2013).
Plag, I.
1999 Morphological Productivity. Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plag, I., Dalton-Puffer, Ch. & Baayen, R.
1999 Morphological productivity across speech and writing. English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 209–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Renouf, A.
2007 Tracing lexical productivity and creativity in the British media: The chavs and the chav-nots? In Lexical Creativity, Texts and Contexts [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 58], J. Munat (ed.), 61–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Defining neology to meet the needs of the translator: A corpus-based study. Neologica. Revue International de Néologie 6: 17–41.Google Scholar
2013 A finer definition of neology in English: The life-cycle of a word. In Corpus Perspectives on Patterns of Lexis [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 57], H. Hasselgård, J. Ebeling & S. Oksefjell Ebeling (eds), 177–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Renouf, A. & Bauer, L.
2000 Contextual clues to word-meaning. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 5(2): 231–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Säily, T.
2011 Variation in morphological productivity in the BNC: Sociolinguistic and methodological considerations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7(1): 119–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.-J.
2008 New words in the mind: Concept-formation and entrenchment of neologisms. Anglia 126(1): 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 English Morphology and Word-formation. An Introduction. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Schröder, A.
2011 On the Productivity of Verbal Prefixation in English. Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Trips, C.
2009 Lexical Semantics and Diachronic Morphology. The Development of -hood, dom and -ship in the History of English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, F.
1999 Iconicity in word-formation. In Form Miming Meaning [Iconicity in Language and Literature 1], M. Nänny & O. Fischer (eds), 307–324. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Arbitrarität, Ikonizität und Motivation. In Lexikologie / Lexicology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wörtern und Wortschätzen. / International Handbook on the Nature and Structure of Words and Vocabularies, Vol. 1, D.A. Cruse, F. Hundsnurscher, M. Job & P.R. Lutzeier (eds), 371–380. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007 Word-formation. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (eds), 650–675. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 100], Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.