Part of
World Englishes: New theoretical and methodological considerations
Edited by Elena Seoane and Cristina Suárez-Gómez
[Varieties of English Around the World G57] 2016
► pp. 6184


: The Bergen Corpus of London Teenage Language 1993 Department of English. University of Bergen. Stenström, Anna-Brita, [URL]Google Scholar
: Linguistic Innovators Corpus: The Language of Adolescents in London 2004Jenny Cheshire, Paul Kerswill, Sue Fox and Ervind TorgensenGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Gisle
1998Are tag questions questions? Evidence from spoken data. Paper presented at the 18 ICAME Conference , Belfast, Northern Ireland.
2013General extenders on the move? Using spoken corpora to study change in real time. Paper presented at the 34 ICAME Conference , Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Anderwald, Lieselotte
2002Negation in Non-standard British English: Gaps, Regularizations and Asymmetries. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Non-standard English and typological principles: The case of negation. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds), 507–529. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Negative concord in British English dialects. In Iyeri (ed.), 116–137.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter
2003Socio-cultural orientation, urban youth styles and the spontaneous acquisition of Turkish by non-Turkish adolescents in Germany. In Discourse Constructions of Youth Identities [Pragmatics and Beyond. New Series 110], Jannis K. Androutsopoulos & Alexandra Georgakopoulou (eds), 223–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beal, Joan & Corrigan, Karen P.
2005 No, nay, never: Negation in Tyneside English. In Iyeri (ed.), 139–156.Google Scholar
Bernini, Giuliano & Ramat, Paolo
1996Negative Sentences in the Languages of Europe: A Typological Approach [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 16]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Ashwini, Deo & Sharma, Devyani
2007A probabilistic approach to be and n’t in the Survey of English Dialects . English Language and Linguistics 11(2): 301–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Torres Cacoullos, Rena
2009The role of prefabs in grammaticization: How the particular and the general interact in language change. In Formulaic Language, Vol. 1: Distribution and Historical Change, Roberta Corrigan, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali & Kathleen Wheatley (eds), 187–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny
1981Variation in the use of ain’t in an urban British dialect. Language in Society 10(3): 365–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1982Variation in an English Dialect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1999English negation from an international perspective. In Negation in the History of English, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Gunnel Tottie & Wim van der Wurff (eds), 29–53. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Edwards, Viv & Whittle, Pam
1999Urban British dialect grammar: The question of dialect levelling. English World-Wide 10(2): 185–225 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny & Fox, Sue
2006New perspectives in was/were variation in London. Paper presented at the 35 NWAV Conference , The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Cheshire, Jenny, Fox, Sue, Kerswill, Paul & Torgersen, Eivind
2011Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(2): 151–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1991The evolution of negation. Journal of Linguistics 27: 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga, van Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem & van der Wurff, Wim
2000The Syntax of Early English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fox, Sue
2012Performed narrative: the pragmatic function of this is + speaker and other quotatives in London adolescent speech. In Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 15], Ingrid van Alphen & Isabelle Buchstaller (eds), 231–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas, Torgersen, Eivind, Hoffmann, Sebastian & Fox, Sue
2010A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of indefinite article forms in London English. Journal of English Linguistic 38(4): 297–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García, Ofelia & Wei, Li
2014Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Houndmills: Palgrave Pivot.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Lilianne
1995The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
1992An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence
1989A Natural History of Negation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2011The Expression of Negation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Howe, Darin
2005Negation in African American Vernacular English. In Iyeiri (ed.), 173–208.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Iyeiri, Yoko
(ed.) 2005Aspects of English Negation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1917Negation in English and other Languages. Københaun: Der Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selshab. Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser I, 5. Copenhagen. Reprinted in 1962 in Selected Writings of Otto Jespersen. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul, Cheshire, Jenny, Fox, Sue & Torgersen, Eivind
2013English as a contact language: The role of children and adolescents. In English as a Contact Language, Daniel ­Schreier & Marianne Hundt (eds), 258–282. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Lunkenheimer, Kerstin
(eds) 2013The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English [eWAVE]. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (11 February 2013).Google Scholar
Littlechild, P.
1983Secondary contractions: secondary contraction of certain negative verbal forms in the speech of a family in Leeds, West Yorkshire, England. Laboratorio Degli Studi Linguistici 1: 5–17.Google Scholar
Lucas, Christopher & Willis, David
2012 Never again. The multiple grammaticalization of never as a marker of negation in English. English Language and Linguistics 16(3): 459–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazzon, Gabriella
2004A History of English Negation. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti
2005Standard Negation. The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
2006Negative concord as an English “Vernacular Universal”. Social history and linguistic typology. Journal of English Linguistics 34: 257–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio
2003Multiple negation in Modern English: A preliminary corpus-based study. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 104: 477–498.Google Scholar
2010 It ain’t nothing to do with my school. Variation and pragmatic uses of ain’t in the language of British English teenagers. English Studies 9(5): 548–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011The expression of negation in British teenagers’ language: A preliminary study. Journal of English Linguistics 39(1): 4–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Variation, development and pragmatic uses of innit in the language of British adults and teenagers. English Language and Linguistics 19/3: 383–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petyt, Keith M.
1979Secondary contractions in West Yorkshire negatives. In Sociolinguistic Patterns, Peter Trudgill (ed.), 91–100. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Pichler, Heike
2007Form-function relations in discourse. The case of I don’t know. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics 13: 174–187.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia & Svendsen, Bente A.
(eds) 2008Multilingual Urban Scandinavia: New Linguistic Practices. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben
2005Crossing. Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer
Stenström, Anna-Brita
2014Teenage Talk: From General Characteristics to the Use of Pragmatic Markers in a Contrastive Perspective. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Britta, Andersen, Gisle & Hasund, Ingrid K.
2002Trends in Teenage Talk [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 8]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2006Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torgersen, Eivind N., Gabrielatos, Costas, Hoffmann, Sebastian & Fox, Sue
2011A corpus-based study of pragmatic markers in London English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7(1): 93–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel
1991Negation in English Speech and Writing. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel & Hoffmann, Sebastian
2006Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4): 283–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1974Sociolinguistics. An Introduction to Language and Society. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
1990The Dialects of England. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter & Hannah, Jean
2002 [1985]International English: A Guide to Varieties of English, 4th edn. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Viereck, Wolfgang
1985Focus on England and Wales [Varieties of English around the World G4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiese, Heike
2009Grammatical innovation in multiethnic urban Europe: New linguistic practices among adolescents. Lingua 119: 782–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, Alison
2008Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Palacios Martínez, Ignacio M.
2021. Taboo vocatives in the language of London teenagers. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:2  pp. 250 ff. DOI logo
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio Miguel
2021. Recent changes in London English. An overview of the main lexical, grammar and discourse features of Multicultural London English (MLE). Complutense Journal of English Studies 29  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.