Article published in:
Understanding Writing SystemsEdited by Merijn Beeksma and Martin Neef
[Written Language & Literacy 21:1] 2018
► pp. 111–145
Orthographic principles in computer-mediated communication
The SUPER-functions of textisms and their interaction with age and medium
Lieke Verheijen | Radboud University
Online messages often diverge from the standard language orthography: so-called textisms have become an indispensable part of youths’ written computer-mediated communication (CMC). This paper presents an in-depth corpus study of texts from four new media produced by Dutch youths: MSN chats, text messages, tweets, and WhatsApp messages. It is demonstrated that Dutch informal written CMC, as in other languages, is implicitly governed by orthographic principles. Relative frequencies of textism types in the corpus show how textisms are effectively used by Dutch youths. Textism types are classified here in terms of forms, operations, and, crucially, functions – the ‘SUPER-functions’: textisms can make orthography more Speechlike, Understandable, Playful, Expressive, or Reduced. Moreover, this study proves that preferences for textism types greatly depend on age group and medium. New media have their own combination of characteristics and constraints, while adolescents and young adults appear to have different perceptions on language use and spelling.
Keywords: computer-mediated communication (CMC), social media, new media, orthography, spelling, writing, youth language
Published online: 02 November 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00012.ver
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00012.ver
References
References
Amaghlobeli, Natia
(2012) Linguistic
features of typographic emoticons in SMS discourse. Theory and Practice in Language
Studies 2(2): 348–354.
Androutsopoulos, Jannis
(2011) Language
change and digital media: A review of conceptions and
evidence. In Tore Kristiansen & Nikolas Coupland (eds.), Standard
Languages and Language Standards in a Changing
Europe, 145–161. Oslo: Novus.
Anis, Jacques
(2007) Neography:
Unconventional spelling in French SMS text messages. In Brenda Danet & Susan
C. Herring (eds.), The
multilingual internet: Language, culture, and communication
online, 87–115. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baars, Renske
(2016, April 25). Gelukkig
maar! Jeugd spelt expres fout op WhatsApp. AD.nl. http://www.ad.nl/bizar/gelukkig-maar-jeugd-spelt-expres-fout-op-whatsapp~afae2d13.
Baron, Naomi
S.
(1984) Computer mediated
communication as a force in language change. Visible
Language 18(2): 118–141.
(2004) See you online: Gender issues
in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social
Psychology 23(4): 397–423.
Bennis, Hans
(2015) Korterlands:
Anarchie in de schrijftaal. Amsterdam: Promotheus Bert Bakker.
Bergs, Alexander
T.
(2009) Just the same old story? The
linguistics of text messaging and its cultural
repercussions. In Charley Rowe & Eva
L. Wyss (eds.), Language
and new media: Linguistic, cultural, and technological
evolutions, 55–73. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
Combes, Céline, Olga Volckaert-Legrier & Pierre Largy
(2014) Automatic
or controlled writing? The effect of a dual task on SMS writing in novice and expert
adolescents. In Louise-Amélie Cougnon & Cédrick Fairon (eds.), SMS
communication: A linguistic
approach, 47–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Craig, David
(2003) Instant
messaging: The language of youth literacy. The Boothe Prize
Essays 2003: 116–133.
Crystal, David
(2006) Language
and the internet, second
edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2008) Txtng:
The gr8 db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Danesi, Marcel
(2017) The
semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the
internet. London: Bloomsbury.
De
Decker, Benny
(2015) Prototypische
chatspeakkenmerken in Vlaamse tienerchattaal: De invloed van gender, leeftijd en medium. Taal
en
Tongval 67(1): 1–41.
De
Jonge, Sarah & Nenagh Kemp
(2012) Text-message
abbreviations and language skills in high school and university students. Journal of Research
in
Reading 35(1): 49–68.
Dings, René
(2010) Weg
om legging: Onjuist spatiegebruik in het Nederlands. Onze
Taal 2010(4): 94–95.
Drouin, Michelle
A. & Claire Davis
(2009) R
u txting? Is the use of text speak hurting your literacy? Journal of Literacy
Research 41(1): 46–67.
Durkin, Kevin, Gina Conti-Ramsden & Allan
J. Walker
(2011) Txt
lang: Texting, textism use and literacy abilities in adolescents with and without specific language
impairment. Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning 27(1): 49–57.
Dürscheid, Christa & Elisabeth Stark
(2013) Anything
goes? SMS, phonographisches Schreiben und Morphemkonstanz. In Martin Neef & Carmen Scherer (eds.), Die
Schnittstelle von Morphologie und geschriebener
Sprache, 189–210. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Evans, Vyvyan
(2017) The
emoji code: How smiley faces, love hearts and thumbs up are changing the way we
communicate. London: Michael O’Mara.
Frehner, Carmen
(2008) Email –
SMS – MMS: The linguistic creativity of asynchronous discourse in the new media
age. Bern: Peter Lang.
Geertsema, Salomé, Charene Hyman & Chantelle van
Deventer
(2011) Short message
service (SMS) language and written language skills: Educators’ perspectives. South African
Journal of
Education 31(4): 475–487.
Grace, Abbie
(2013) Mobile phone text messaging language: How and why undergraduates use textisms. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania.
Hilte, Lisa, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Walter Daelemans
(2016) Expressiveness
in Flemish online teenage talk: A corpus-based analysis of social and medium-related linguistic
variation. In Darja Fišer & Martin Beißwenger (eds.), Proceedings
of the 4th conference on CMC and social media corpora for the
humanities, 30–33. Ljubljana: Academic Publishing Division of the Faculty of Arts of the University of Ljubljana.
(2017) Modeling
non-standard language use in adolescents’ CMC: The impact and interaction of age, gender and
education. In Egon
W. Stemle & Ciara
R. Wigham (eds.), Proceedings
of the 5th conference on CMC and social media corpora for the
humanities, 611–615. Bolzano: Eurac Research.
Holmes, Janet
(1992) An
introduction to
sociolinguistics. London: Longman.
Instagram, Inc.
Kemp, Nenagh
(2010) Texting
versus txting: Reading and writing text messages, and links with other linguistic
skills. Writing Systems
Research 2(1): 53–71.
Kirsten
Torrado, Úrsula
(2014) Development
of SMS language from 2000 to 2010: A comparison of two
corpora. In Louise-Amélie Cougnon & Cédrick Fairon (eds.), SMS
communication: A linguistic
approach, 67–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Koopmans, Aloys, Hedwich Steneker & Arjen Spoelstra
Labov, William
(1966) The
social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Lanchantin, Tonia, Aurélie Simoës-Perlant & Pierre Largy
(2015) The amount of French text messaging related to spelling level: why some letters are produced and others are not? PsychNology Journal 13(1): 7–56.
Levenshtein, Vladimir
I.
(1966) Binary codes capable of
correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics
Doklady 10(8): 707–710.
Marrón Fernández de Velasco, Daniel
(2015) From texting to Internet Language: Analysis of contemporary language evolution: The case of YouTube. Master thesis, University of Valladolid.
McWhorter, John
(2013, April 25). Is texting killing the English language? Time. http://ideas.time.com/2013/04/25/is-texting-killing-the-english-language
Neef, Martin
(2015) Writing
systems as modular objects: Proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open
Linguistics 1(1): 708–721.
Novak, Petra
Kralj, Jasmina Smailovic, Borut Sluban & Igor Mozetič
(2015) Sentiment
of emojis. PloS
One 10(12): 1–21.
Oostdijk, Nelleke, Martin Reynaert, Véronique Hoste & Ineke Schuurman
(2013) The
construction of a 500-million-word reference corpus of contemporary written
Dutch. In Peter Spyns & Jan Odijk (eds.), Essential
speech and language technology for Dutch: Results by the STEVIN
programme, 219–247. Heidelberg: Springer.
Panckhurst, Rachel
(2009) Short
Message Service (SMS): typologie et problématiques futures. In Teddy Arnavielle (ed.), Polyphonies,
pour Michelle Lanvin, 33–52. Université Paul-Valéry: Montpellier 3.
Peersman, Claudia, Walter Daelemans, Reinhild Vandekerckhove, Bram Vandekerckhove & Leona Van Vaerenbergh
(2016) The effects of age, gender and region on non-standard linguistic variation in online social networks http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.02431
Pelkman, Martha
(2015, March 10). What’s App: taalverloedering of taalverrijking? DrsPee. https://drspee.nl/whats-app-taalverloedering-of-taalverrijking
Pfeffer, Jürgen, Thomas Zorbach & Kathleen
M. Carley
(2014) Understanding
online firestorms: Negative word-of-mouth dynamics in social media networks. Journal of
Marketing
Communications 20(1–2): 117–128.
Plester, Beverly, Clare Wood & Victoria Bell
(2008) Txt
msg n school literacy: Does texting and knowledge of text abbreviations adversely affect children’s literacy
attainment? Literacy 42(3): 137–144.
Plester, Beverly, Clare Wood & Puja Joshi
(2009) Exploring
the relationship between children’s knowledge of text message abbreviations and school literacy
outcomes. British Journal of Developmental
Psychology 27(1): 145–161.
Postma, Koos
(2011) Geen
paniek! Een analyse van de beeldvorming van sms-taal in Nederland. Master
thesis, VU University Amsterdam.
Reinkemeyer, Anja
(2013) Die
Formenvielfalt des langage SMS im Wechselspiel zwischen Effizienz, Expertise und Expressivität: eine
Untersuchung der innovativen Schreibweise in französischen
SMS. Tübingen.
Rosen, Larry
D., Jennifer Chang, Lynne Erwin, L.
Mark Carrier & Nancy
A. Cheever
(2010) The
relationship between ‘textisms’ and formal and informal writing among young
adults. Communication
Research 37(3): 420–440.
Rutkowska, Hannah, & Paul Rössler
(2012) Orthographic
variables. In Juan
Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan
Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The
handbook of historical
sociolinguistics, 221–244. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Schmidt, Carl
(2013, January 8). Nederlandse
taal verslechtert. 10 air. https://radio201c.wordpress.com/2013/01/08/nederlandse-taal-verslechterd
Schwartz, H.
Andrew, Johannes
C. Eichstaedt, Margaret
L. Kern, Lukasz Dziurzynski, Stephanie
M. Ramones, Megha Agrawal … Lyle
H. Ungar
(2013) Personality,
gender, and age in the language of social media: The open-vocabulary approach. PLoS
ONE 8(9): e73791.
Seuren, Lucas
(2017, March 9). WhatsAppachtig
taalgebruik. Neerlandistiek. http://www.neerlandistiek.nl/2017/03/13135
Shortis, Tim
(2007) Gr8
txtpectations: The creativity of text spelling. English Drama
Media 8: 21–26.
Silva, Cláudia
(2011) Writing
in Portuguese chats :). A new wrtng systm? Written Language &
Literacy 14(1): 143–156.
Snap Inc.
(2018) When does Snapchat
delete Snaps and Chats? Snapchat Support. https://support.snapchat.com/en-GB/a/when-are-snaps-chats-deleted
Stoffelen, Anneke
(2016, January 21). Docenten:
‘Vak Nederlands moet op de schop’. De Volkskrant. http://www.volkskrant.nl/binnenland/docenten-vak-nederlands-moet-op-de-schop~a4229820
Tagg, Caroline
(2015) Exploring digital communication: Language in action. London / New York: Routledge.
Tagg, Caroline, Alistair Baron & Paul Rayson
(2014) “i
didn’t spel that wrong did i. Oops”: Analysis and normalisation of SMS spelling
variation. In Louise-Amélie Cougnon & Cédrick Fairon (eds.), SMS
communication: A linguistic
approach, 217–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thurlow, Crispin & Alex Brown
(2003) Generation
txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis
Online 1. Retrieved from https://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a3/thurlow2002003-paper.html
Thurlow, Crispin & Michele Poff
(2013) Text
messaging. In Susan Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds.), Pragmatics
of computer-mediated
communication, 163–190. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
Ting-Toomey, Stella & Atsuko Kurogi
(1998) Facework
competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal
of Intercultural
Relations 22(2): 187–225.
Urban Dictionary. “1337
speak.”
(cited 13 March
2017). Retrieved from http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=1337%20speak
Vandekerckhove, Reinhild & Dominiek Sandra
(2016) De
potentiële impact van informele online communicatie op de spellingpraktijk van Vlaamse tieners in
schoolcontext. Tijdschrift voor
Taalbeheersing 38(3): 201–234.
Varnhagen, Connie
K., G.
Peggy McFall, Nicole Pugh, Lisa Routledge, Heather Sumida-MacDonald & Trudy
E. Kwong
(2010) lol:
New language and spelling in instant messaging. Reading and
Writing 23(6): 719–733.
Veer, Neil van der, Steven Boekee, Hans Hoekstra & Oscar Peters
(2018, January 29). Nationale Social Media Onderzoek 2018. Newcom Research & Consultancy. https://www.bindinc.nl/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Newcom-Nationale-Social-Media-Onderzoek-2018-3.pdf
Verheijen, Lieke
(2013) The
effects of text messaging and instant messaging on literacy. English
Studies 94(5): 582–602.
(2015) Out-of-the-ordinary
orthography: the use of textisms in Dutch youngsters’ written computer-mediated
communication. York Papers in Linguistics, special issue, PARLAY
Proceedings 2: 127–142.
Verheijen, Lieke, & Wessel Stoop
(2016) Collecting
Facebook posts and WhatsApp chats: corpus compilation of private social media
messages. In P. Sojka et al. (eds.), Text,
Speech and Dialogue: 19th International Conference, TSD 2016, LNAI
9924, 249–258. Springer.
Werry, Christopher
C.
(1996) Linguistic and interactional
features of Internet Relay Chat. In Susan
C. Herring (ed.), Computer-mediated
communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural
perspectives, 47–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Winzker, Kristy, Frenette Southwood & Kate Huddlestone
(2009) Investigating
the impact of SMS speak on the written work of English first language and English second language high school
learners. Per
Linguam 25(2): 1–16.
Zappavigna, Michele
(ed.) (2012) Discourse
of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the Web. New York: Continuum.