A featural analysis of the Modern Roman Alphabet

Beatrice Primus | University of Cologne

The present article shows that the letters of the Modern Roman Alphabet have an internal structure that is highly systematic in both inner-graphematic and functional-phonological terms. The framework of analysis is Optimality Theory. This approach is congenial for the data at issue as many apparently unmotivated exceptions are optimal choices among competing candidates that are evaluated by violable ranked constraints. The results of the present investigation corroborate a branching correspondence model in which general modality-independent constraints such as dependency, compositionality, markedness and iconism are shown to have independent modality-specific instantiations in speech and writing with bidirectional correspondences serving as functional links across modalities.

Published online: 22 March 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.2.06pri

Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

Baroni, Antonio

2013. Eye dialect and casual speech spelling: Orthographic variation in OT. Writing Systems Research 5:1 ► pp. 24 ff.

Berg, Kristian

2010. Review of Bredel (2008): Die Interpunktion des Deutschen. Ein kompositionelles System zur Online-Steuerung des Lesens. Written Language & Literacy 13:2 ► pp. 290 ff.

Berg, Kristian

2013. Graphemic alternations in English as a reflex of morphological structure. Morphology 23:4 ► pp. 387 ff.

Domahs, Frank, Katharina Blessing, Christina Kauschke & Ulrike Domahs

2016. Bono Bo and Fla Mingo: Reflections of Speech Prosody in German Second Graders’ Writing to Dictation. Frontiers in Psychology 7

Eisenberg, Peter & Nanna Fuhrhop

2007. Schulorthographie und Graphematik. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 26:spec ► pp. 15 ff.

Evertz, Martin & Beatrice Primus

2013. The graphematic foot in English and German. Writing Systems Research 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Evertz, Martin & Beatrice Primus

2017. Rhythmic constraints in handwriting. A review of Pagliarini et al. (2017). Written Language & Literacy 20:2 ► pp. 252 ff.

Fischer, Jean-Paul

2013. Digit reversal in children’s writing: A simple theory and its empirical validation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 115:2 ► pp. 356 ff.

Fuhrhop, Nanna, Rebecca Carroll, Catharina Drews & Esther Ruigendijk

2016. Sind die Buchstabenformen eine Lesehilfe?. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Germanistenverbandes 63:2 ► pp. 119 ff.

Grainger, Jonathan & Thomas Hannagan

2014. What is special about orthographic processing?. Written Language & Literacy 17:2 ► pp. 225 ff.

Meletis, Dimitrios

2019. The grapheme as a universal basic unit of writing. Writing Systems Research 11:1 ► pp. 26 ff.

Portex, Marine, Carolane Hélin, Corinne Ponce & Jean-Noël Foulin

2018. Dynamics of mirror writing compared to conventional writing in typical preliterate children. Reading and Writing 31:6 ► pp. 1435 ff.

Schmidt, Karsten

2014. Morphophonographic regularities in German: the graphematic syllable boundary. Written Language & Literacy 17:2 ► pp. 253 ff.

Si-Teak Yu

2016. Absolute Ungrammatikalität: Distributionelle Beschränkungen des Dehnungs - 'h' im Stamm. Zeitschrift f？r Deutsche Sprache und Literatur null:74 ► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.