Article published in:
Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity
Edited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa
[Not in series 186] 2014
► pp. 271–294

Establishing joint orientation towards commercial objects in a self-service store

How practices of categorisation matter

| KU Leuven
This chapter investigates how persons shopping together initiate orientation towards commercial objects that populate self-service stores. Drawing on the methods developed in conversation analysis, it discusses the actions that shoppers accomplish when introducing a ‘new’ object into their interaction. In the supermarket setting, objects are available resources: as customers navigate through the aisles of the store, they use (commercial) objects as landmarks, as resources allowing them to organise their overall shopping activity, to initiate buying decisions, to engage in topic talk, etc. This study furthermore discusses the multimodal resources that shoppers employ when establishing a joint focus of attention and analyses the categorisation work that they accomplish when orienting towards objects that are on sale.
Published online: 12 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.12ste
References
Appadurai, A.
(Ed.) (1986) The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aston, G.
(Ed.) (1988) Negotiating service: Studies in the discourse of bookshop encounters. Bologna: Clueb.Google Scholar
Bartoletti, R.
(2002) La narrazione delle cose: Analisi socio-comunicativa degli oggetti [The narration of things: A socio-communicative analysis of objects]. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Bilmes, J.
(2009) Taxonomies are for talking: Reanalyzing a Sacks classic. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1600–1610. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, R.D., Miniard, P.W., & Engel, J.F.
(2006) Consumer behavior. Mason: South-Western(10th ed.).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
(1979) La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement [Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste]. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Clark, C., & Pinch, T.
(2010) Some major organisational consequences of some ‘minor’, organised conduct: Evidence from a video analysis of pre-verbal service encounters in a showroom retail store. In N. Llewellyn, & J. Hindmarsh (Eds.), Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 140–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E.
(2011) Grammaticalization and conversation. In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 424–437). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Stefani, E.
(2010) Reference as an interactively and multimodally accomplished practice: Organizing spatial reorientation in guided tours. In M. Pettorino, A. Giannini, I. Chiari, & F.M. Dovetto (Eds.), Spoken communication (pp. 137–170). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
(2011). “Ah petta ecco, io prendo questi che mi piacciono”. Agire come coppia al supermercato: Un approccio conversazionale e multimodale allo studio dei processi decisionali [Doing being a couple at the supermarket: A conversational and multimodal approach to decision-making processes]. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
(2013) The collaborative organisation of next actions in a semiotically rich environment: Shopping as a couple. In P. Haddington, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Interaction and mobility: Language and the body in motion (pp. 123–151). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B.
(1979) The world as goods: Towards an anthropology of consumption. London: Allen Lane. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A., & Ochs, E.
(1979) Left-dislocation in Italian conversation. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics. Vol 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 377–416). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, N., & Stivers, T.
(Eds.) (2007) Person reference in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H., & Wieder, D.L.
(1992) Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson, & R.M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 175–205). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Geluykens, R.
(1992) From discourse process to grammatical construction: On left-dislocation in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J.J.
(1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A.
(1992) Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti, & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 1–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M.H.
(1996) Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In Y. Engeström, & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 61–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haakana, M., & Sorjonen, M.-L.
(2011) Invoking another context: Playfulness in buying lottery tickets at convenience stores. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(5), 1288–1302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G.
(2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C.
(2000) Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24(5), 523–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G.H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P.
(2006) The mystery of the missing referent: Objects, procedures, and the problem of the instruction follower. CSCW ’06 Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work . New York, ACM, 373–382. Crossref
Lambrecht, K.
(2001) Dislocation. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Österreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook (pp. 1050–1078).Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Lamoureux, E.L.
(1985) An analysis of conversation in service encounters. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Lave, J.
(1988) Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, B.
(1922) Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: George Routledge.Google Scholar
Mauss, M.
(1923/1924) Essai sur le don: Forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés primitives [An essay on the gift: The form and reason of exchange in archaic societies]. Année Sociologique, 1, 30–186.Google Scholar
Merritt, M.W.
(1976) Resources for saying in service encounters. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Miller, D.
(1987) Mass consumption and material culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T.F.
(1957) The language of buying and selling in Cyrenaica: A situational statement. Hespéris, 44, 31–71.Google Scholar
Monzoni, C.
(2005) The use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-party conversation. In A. Hakulinen, & M. Selting (Eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction (pp. 129–157). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevile, M.
(2013) Collaboration in crisis: Pursuing perception through multiple descriptions (how friendly vehicles became damn rocket launchers). In A. De Rycker, & Z. Mohd Don (Eds.), Discourse and crisis: Critical perspectives (pp. 159–183). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nishizaka, A.
(2000) Seeing what one sees: Perception, emotion, and activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 105–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D.A.
(1988) The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ochs, E.
(1979) Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs, & B.B. Schiefflen (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43–72). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1992) Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E.A.
(1979) Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A.
(1972) Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
(1996) Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In B.A. Fox (Ed.), Studies in anaphora (pp. 437–485). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semprini, A.
(Ed.) (1999) Il senso delle cose. I significati sociali e culturali degli oggetti quotidiani [The sense of things: The social and cultural meanings of everyday objects]. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Stukenbrock, A., & Birkner, K.
(2010) Multimodale Ressourcen für Stadtführungen [Multimodal resources for guided city tours]. In M. Costa, & B. Müller-Jacquier (Eds.), Deutschland als fremde Kultur: Vermittlungsverfahren in Stadtführungen [Germany as a foreign culture: Mediation procedures in guided city tours] (pp. 214–243). München: Iudicium.Google Scholar
vom Lehn, D.
(2013) Withdrawing from exhibits: The interactional organisation of museum visits. In P. Haddington, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Interaction and mobility: Language and the body in motion (pp. 65–90). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

No author info given
2015.  In Time and Emergence in Grammar [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 28], Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.