Article published in:
The Acquisition of the Present
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Not in series 196] 2015
► pp. 215252
References
Andersen, R.W
1990Verbal virtuosity and speakers’ purposes. In Variability in Second Language Acquisition: Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the Second Language Research Forum , H. Burmeister & P.L. Rounds (eds), 1–24. Eugene OR: University of Oregon.
1991Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In Crosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 2], T. Huebner & C.A. Ferguson (eds), 305–324. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994The insider’s advantage. Italiano: Lingua seconda/lingua straniera (Italian: Second language/foreign language), A. Giacalone Ramat & M. Vedovelli (eds), 1–26. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Andersen, R.W. & Shirai, Y
1994Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 133–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin/creole connection. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds), 527–570. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Antinucci, F. & Miller, R
1976How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language 3: 169–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ayoun, D. & Salaberry, M. R
2008acquisition of English tense–aspect morphology by advanced French instructed learners. Language Learning 58: 555–595. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K
1998Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 471–508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Bergström, A
1996The acquisition of tense and aspect in SLA and FLL: A study of learner narratives in English (SL) and French (FL). Canadian Modern Language Review 52: 308–330.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Reynolds, D.W
1995The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly 29: 107–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D
1981Roots of Language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lifter, K. & Hafitz, J
1980The semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflections in child language. Language 56: 386–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J. & Swift, M
2004Event realization and default aspect. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 263–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bronckart, J.-P. & Sinclair, H
1973Time, tense, and aspect. Cognition 2: 107–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R
1973A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J
1994The grammaticization of zero. In Perspectives on Grammaticalization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109], W. Pagliuca (ed.), 235–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J. & Shirai, Y
2010The development of aspectual marking in Mandarin Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics 31: 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, L
2002The roles of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning 52: 43–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishida, K
2007Developing understanding of how the desu/masu and plain forms express one’s stance. In Selected Papers from the Conference of Pragmatics in the CJK Classroom, 5-7 June 2006, D.R. Yoshimi & H. Wang (eds), 97–120. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Ishida, M
2004Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form -te i-(ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning 54: 311–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izquierdo, J. & Collins, L
2008The facilitative role of L1 influence in tense–aspect marking: A comparison of Hispanophone and Anglophone learners of French. The Modern Language Journal 92: 350–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koyama, S
2003Nihongo no tensu-asupekuto no syuutoku ni okeru huhensei to kobetusei: bogo no yakuwari to eikyoo o tyuusin ni (Universality and variability in the acquisition of Japanese tense-aspect: focusing on the role and effect of L1). In Gengo to Kyooiku: Nihongo o Taisyoo ni (Language and Education: The Case of Japanese), S. Koyama, M. Nohara & K. Otomo (eds), 415–436. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Lee, E.-J
2001Interlanguage development by two Korean speakers of English with a focus on temporality. Language Learning 51: 591–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. & Shirai, Y
2000The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, P., Maher, S., Newmark, E. & Hurley, J
2001The role of parental input in the acquisition of aspect. Journal of Cognitive Science 2: 119–143.Google Scholar
Martin, S.E
1988A Reference Grammar of Japanese. Rutland VT: Charles E. Tuttle.Google Scholar
Maynard, S.K
1991Pragmatics of discourse modality: A case of da and desu/masu forms in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 551–582. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mourelatos, A.P.D
1981Events, processes, and states. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol 14: Tense and Aspect, P.J. Tedeschi & A. Zaenen (eds), 191–212. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Okuda, Y
1978Asupekuto no kenkyuu o megutte (zyoo) (On the study of aspect (1)). Kyooiku Kokugo (Language Education) 53: 33–44.Google Scholar
Rohde, A
1996The Aspect Hypothesis and emergence of tense distinctions in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Linguistics 34: 1115–1137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Tense and aspect in naturalistic L2 acquisition. In Psycholinguistics on the Threshold of the Year 2000: Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of the International Society of Applied Linguistics, M. de Graca Pinto, J. Veloso & B. Maia (eds), 359–363. Porto: University of Portugal.Google Scholar
Robison, R.E
1990The primacy of aspect: aspectual marking in English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 315–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995The Aspect Hypothesis revisited: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect marking in interlanguage. Applied Linguistics 16: 344–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryu, J., Horie, K. & Shirai, Y
In press. The L2 Acquisition of the Korean imperfective aspect markers -ko iss- and -a iss- by Japanese learners: A multiple-factor account. Language Learning.
Salaberry, M.R
1999The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish. Applied Linguistics 20: 151–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibata, M
1998The use of tense-aspect markers in a Brazilian worker’s Japanese. Bulletin of the Institute for Area Studies of Okinawa University 11: 45–63.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M
1990The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y
1991Primacy of Aspect in Language Acquisition: Simplified Input and Prototype. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
1993Inherent aspect and the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology in Japanese. In Argument Structure: Its Syntax and Acquisition, H. Nakajima & Y. Otsu (eds), 185–211. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
1994On the overgeneralization of progressive marking on stative verbs: Bioprogram or input? First Language 14: 67–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998aThe emergence of tense-aspect morphology in Japanese: Universal predisposition? First Language 18: 281–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998bWhere the progressive and the resultative meet: Imperfective aspect in Japanese, Korean, Chinese and English. Studies in Language 22: 661–692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000The semantics of the Japanese imperfective -teiru: An integrative approach. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 327–361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Temporality in first and second language acquisition. In The Expression of Time, W. Klein & P. Li (eds), 167–193. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011Lexical and grammatical aspect in language acquisition, processing, and disorders. In Studies in Language Sciences, S. Arita, Y.G. Butler, K. Horie, E. Hauser, Y. Shirai, R. Mazuka & J. Tsubakita (eds), 41–57. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2012Second language acquisition research and Japanese language teaching: A functionalist approach. Japanese Studies 32: 317–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Andersen, R. W
1995The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language 71: 743–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Kurono, A
1998The acquisition of tense-aspect marking in Japanese as a second language. Language Learning 48: 245–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Nishi, Y
2002Lexicalization of aspectual structures in English and Japanese. In Typology and Second Language Acquisition, A. Giacalone Ramat (ed.), 267–290. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005How what we mean impacts how we talk: The Japanese imperfective aspect marker -teiru in conversation. In The Power of Context in Language Learning and Teaching, J. Frodesen & C. Holten (eds), 39–48. Boston MA: Thomson Heinle.Google Scholar
Smith, C.S
1997The Parameter of Aspect, 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sugaya, N
2003Nihongo gakusyuusya no asupekuto syuutoku ni kansuru zyuudan kenkyuu: doosa no zizoku to kekka no zyootai no -te i-ru o tyuusin ni (A longitudinal study on the acquisition of imperfective aspect morphology by L2 learners of Japanese: focusing on the progressive and the resultative state use of -te i-ru). Nihongo Kyooiku (Journal of Japanese Language Teaching) 119: 65–74.Google Scholar
2005Nihongo no asupekuto syuutoku ni kansuru kenkyuu no doukou (An overview of the acquisition of the aspect morphology in Japanese as a second language). Gengo bunka to Nihongo kyouiku 11 gatu tokushuugou ( Language Culture and Japanese Education, November special issue ), 39–67.Google Scholar
Sugaya, N. & Shirai, Y
2007The acquisition of progressive and resultative meanings of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese: Universals, transfer, or multiple factors? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29: 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sugaya N. & Shirai, Y
2009Can L2 learners productively use Japanese tense-aspect markers? A usage-based approach. In Formulaic Language, Vol. 2: Acquisition, Loss, Psychological Reality, and Functional Explanations [Typological Studies in Language 82], R. Corrigan, E.A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali & K. Wheatley (eds), 423–444. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z
1957Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66: 143–160 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, H. J
1972The Compositional Nature of the Aspects [Foundations of Language Supplementary Series 15]. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wu, R.J
2002Discourse-pragmatic principles for temporal reference in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Studies in Language 26: 513–541. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoshikawa, T
1976Gendai Nihongo doosi no asupekuto no kenkyuu (Research on the aspect of verbs in Modern Japanese). In Nihongo doosi no asupekuto ( Aspects of Japanese Verbs ), H. Kindaichi (ed.), 155–327. Tokyo: Mugi Shobo.Google Scholar