Article published in:
Becoming and Being an Applied Linguist: The life histories of some applied linguists
Edited by Rod Ellis
[Not in series 203] 2016
► pp. 175212
References

References

Ammar, A., & Spada, N.
(2006) One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ammar, A., Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N.
(2010) Awareness of L1/L2 differences: Does it matter? Language Awareness, 19, 129–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L.
(1970) Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Hood, L., & Lightbown, P.M.
(1974) Imitation in language development: If, when, and why. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 380–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L., Lightbown, P.M., & Hood, L.
(1975) Structure and variation in child language (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development). Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Breen, M., & Candlin, C.
(1980) The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 89–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brumfit, C., & Johnson, K.
(1979) The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, V.P., & Thomas, W.P.
(2004) The astounding effectiveness of dual language education for all. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 2, 1–20.Google Scholar
Collins, L., & White, J.
(2011) An intensive look at intensity and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 106–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Closing the gap: Intensity and proficiency. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning (pp. 45–65). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Collins, L., Halter, R.H., Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N.
(1999) Time and the distribution of time in L2 instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 655–680. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, L., Trofimovich, P., White, J., & Horst, M., & Cardoso, W.
(2009) Some input on the easy/difficult grammar question. Modern Language Journal, 93, 336–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, L., White, J., Trofimovich, P., Cardoso, W. & Horst, M.
(2012) When comprehensible input is not comprehensive input: A multi-dimensional analysis of instructional input in intensive English as a foreign language. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning (pp. 66–87). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Corder, S.P.
(1967) The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crago, M.
(1992) Communicative interaction and second language acquisition: An Inuit example. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 487–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A., Criper, C., & Howatt, A.
(Eds.) (1984) Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C.
(2002) Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.Google Scholar
Fanselow, J.
(1987) Breaking rules: Generating and exploring alternatives in language teaching. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Forsyth, A.
(1990) Projet expérimental en anglais langue seconde à l’élémentaire au Nouveau-Brunswick. Education Canada, Summer, 23–29.Google Scholar
Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N.
(2005) Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on ACCESS to fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 325–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F.
(1987) Learning through two languages: Studies of immersion and bilingual education. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Krashen, S.D.
(1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Lambert, W.E., & Tucker, G.R.
(1972) The bilingual education of children. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.M.
(1977a) Consistency and variation in the acquisition of French. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
(1977b) French L2 learners: What they’re talking about . Language Learning, 27, 371–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1980) The acquisition and use of questions by French L2 learners. In S. Felix (Ed.), Second language development: Trends and issues (pp. 151–175). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
(1983a) Acquiring English L2 in Quebec classrooms. In S. Felix & H. Wode (Eds.), Language development at the crossroads (pp. 101–120). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
(1983b) Core ESL in Quebec: What results can we expect? Dialogue, 2 (1), 4–6 (Newsletter on ESL and FSL, published by the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada).Google Scholar
(1983c) Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences in L2 acquisition. In H. Seliger & M. Long (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research in language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1984) Input and acquisition in second language classrooms. TESL Canada Journal, 1, 55–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1985a) Can language acquisition be altered by instruction? In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 101–112). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1985b) Great expectations: Second language acquisition research and classroom teaching. Applied Linguistics, 6, 174–189.Google Scholar
(1986) ESL: Time to teach. SPEAQ-Out, 14, 1,3,7–9,11.Google Scholar
(1987) Classroom language as input to second language acquisition. In C. Pfaff (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1990) Process-product research on second language learning in classrooms. In B. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins, & M. Swain (Eds.), The development of second language proficiency (pp. 82–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991) What have we here? Some observations on the role of instruction in second language acquisition. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research: A commemorative volume for Claus Faerch, (pp. 197–212). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1992) Can they do it themselves? A comprehension-based ESL course for young children. In R. Courchêne, J. Glidden, J. St. John, & C. Therrien (Eds.), Comprehension-based second language teaching: Current trends (pp. 353–370). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Anniversary article: Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21, 431–462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Fair trade: Two-way bilingual education. ELIA: Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada, 7, 9–34.Google Scholar
(2008a) Easy as pie? Children learning languages. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–25.Google Scholar
(2008b) Transfer appropriate processing as a model for classroom second language acquisition. In Z. Han (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp. 27–44). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2012) Intensive L2 instruction in Canada: Why not immersion? In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Intensive exposure experiences in SL learning (pp. 25–44). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2014) Focus on content-based language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.M., & d’Anglejan, A.
(1985) Some input considerations for word order in French L1 and L2 acquisition. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.M., & Barkman, B.
(1978) Interactions among learners, teachers, texts. and methods of English as a second language. Report to the Department of the Secretary of State of Canada, ED 166981.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.M., & Libben, G.
(1984) The recognition and use of cognates by L2 learners. In R.W. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N.
(1978) Performance on an oral communication task by Francophone ESL learners. SPEAQ Journal, 2, 35–54.Google Scholar
(1990) Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429–448. (Reprinted in H.D. Brown & S. Gonzo (Eds.) (1995) Readings in Second Language Acquisition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P.M., & Spada. N.
(1991) Étude des effets à long terme de l’apprentissage intensif de l’anglais, langue seconde, au primaire. Canadian Modern Language Review, 48, 90–117.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N.
(1994) An innovative program for primary ESL in Quebec. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 563–579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Learning English as a second language in a special school in Quebec. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 315–355.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.M., Halter, R., White, J., & Horst, M.
(2002) Comprehension-based learning: The limits of “do it yourself”. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 427–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P.M., Spada, N., & White, L.
(Eds.) (1993)  The role of instruction in second language acquisition . [Thematic issue] Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2).Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.M., Minaya-Rowe, L., Benítez, A., & Mendía, P.
(2007) Just do it! Professional development in a dual language program. Workshop presented at TESOL (Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages). Seattle, March 24, 2007.
Long, M.H.
(1980) Inside the ‘Black Box’: Methodological issues in classroom research on language learning. Language Learning, 30, 1–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R.
(2007) Learning and teaching languages through content (Language Learning & Language Teaching 18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, W.F.
(1978) Cost-benefit quantification of language teaching behavior. Die Neueren Sprachen, 1, 2–32.Google Scholar
Meara, P.M., Lightbown, P.M., & Halter, R.H.
(1997) Classrooms as lexical environments. Language Teaching Research, 1, 28–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K.
(2004) Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32, 207–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C.
(Ed.) (2006) Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Nicholas, H., & Lightbown, P.M.
(2008) Defining child second language acquisition, defining roles for L2 instruction. In J. Philp, R. Oliver, & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language acquisition and the younger learner: Child’s play (Language Learning & Language Teaching 23) (pp. 27–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N.
(2001) Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719–758. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Lightbown, P.M.
(1999) Psycholinguistic approaches to SLA. In W. Grabe (Ed). Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 43–63Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH., & Coulthard, R.M.
(1975) Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spada, N.
(1987) Relationships between instructional differences and learning outcomes: A process-product study of communicative language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 8, 137–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M.
(1995) COLT: Communicative Orientation of Language Teaching observation scheme: Coding conventions and applications. Sydney, Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.Google Scholar
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P.M.
(1989) Intensive ESL programs in Quebec primary schools. TESL Canada Journal, 7, 11–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Instruction, L1 influence and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 83, 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) L1 and L2 in the education of Inuit children in northern Quebec: Abilities and perceptions. Language and Education, 16, 212–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., Lightbown, P.M., & White, J.L.
(2005) The importance of form/meaning mappings in explicit form-focussed instruction. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Current issues in instructed second language learning (pp. 199–234), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Lightbown, P.M., & Halter, R.H.
(2013) Are certain types of instruction better for certain learners? System, 41, 914–922. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Lightbown, P.M., Halter, R.H., & Song, H.
(2009.) Comprehension-based practice: The development of L2 pronunciation in a listening and reading program. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 609–639. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, J., & Lightbown, P.M.
(1984) Asking and answering in ESL classes. Canadian Modern Language Review 40, 228–44.Google Scholar
White, J., & Ranta, L.
(2002) Examining the interface between metalinguistic performance and oral production in a second language. Language Awareness, 11, 259–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, J., & Turner, C.
(2012) What language is promoted in intensive programs? Analyzing language generated from oral assessment tasks. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning (pp. 88–110). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P.M., & Ranta, L.
(1991) Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12, 416–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, D.A.
(1976) Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Ellis, Rod
2020. Task-based language teaching for beginner-level young learners. Language Teaching for Young Learners 2:1  pp. 4 ff. Crossref logo
Erlam, Rosemary
2019.  In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13],  pp. 229 ff. Crossref logo
Erlam, Rosemary & Rod Ellis
2018. Task-Based Language Teaching for Beginner-Level Learners of L2 French: An Exploratory Study. The Canadian Modern Language Review 74:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Sato, Masatoshi & Shawn Loewen
2019.  In Doing SLA Research with Implications for the Classroom [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 52],  pp. 31 ff. Crossref logo
Sato, Masatoshi & Shawn Loewen
2019. Do teachers care about research? The research–pedagogy dialogue. ELT Journal 73:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.