Chapter published in:
Crossroads Semantics: Computation, experiment and grammar
Edited by Hilke Reckman, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Maarten Hijzelendoorn and Rint Sybesma
[Not in series 210] 2017
► pp. 107123
References

References

Beek, Leonoor van der, Gosse Bouma, Robert Malouf & Gertjan van Noord
2002The Alpino Dependency Treebank. In Tanja Gaustad (ed.), Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands 2001. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brants, Sabine, Stefanie Dipper, Peter Eisenberg, Silvia Hansen-Schirra, Esther König, Wolfgang Lezius, Christian Rohrer, George Smith & Hans Uszkoreit
2004TIGER: Linguistic Interpretation of a German Corpus. Research on Language and Computation 2. 597–620. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charniak, Eugene, Don Blaheta, Niyu Ge, Keith Hall, John Hale & Mark Johnson
2000BLLIP 1987–89 WSJ Corpus Release 1 LDC2000T43. DVD. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Drach, Erich
1937Grundgedanken der deutschen Satzlehre. Frankfurt am Main: Diesterweg. [Reprinted in 1963]Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
1995Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order. In Mickey Noonan & Pamela Downing (eds.), Word order in discourse, 105–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eerten, Laura van
2007Over het Corpus Gesproken Nederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 12. 194–215.Google Scholar
Fitz, Hartmut, Franklin Chang & Morten H. Christiansen
2011A connectionist account of the acquisition and processing of relative clauses. In Evan Kidd (ed.), The acquisition of relative clauses. Processing, typology and function, 39–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, John J., Eduard C. Holliman & Jane McDaniel
1992SWITCH-BOARD: Telephone speech corpus for research and development. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Audio, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP-92), 517–520.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2006Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42. 25–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert
2010Wie wurde Deutsch OV? Zur diachronen Dynamik eines Strukturparameters der germanischen Sprachen. In Arne Ziegler (ed.), Historische Textgrammatik und Historische Syntax des Deutschen – Traditionen, Innovationen, Perspektiven, 11–32. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N.
1986Der Begriff ‘Mittelfeld’: Anmerkungen über die Theorie der topologischen Felder. In Walter Weiss, Herbert E. Wiegand & Marga Reis (eds.), Akten des VII. Internationalen Germanistenkongresses, 329–340. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Heleen, Michael Moortgat, Ineke Schuurman & Ton van der Wouden
2001Syntactic annotation for the spoken Dutch corpus project (CGN). Language and Computers 37(1). 73–87.Google Scholar
Kempen, Gerard & Karin Harbusch
2016Verb-second word order after German weil ‘because’: Psycholinguistic theory from corpus-linguistic data. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 1(1). 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, Esther & Wolfgang Lezius
2003The TIGER language: A Description Language for Syntax Graphs, Formal Definition. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan
1975Dutch as an SOV Language. Linguistic analysis 1. 111–136.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Maryellen C., Jessica L. Montag & Silvia P. Gennari
2016Are there really syntactic complexity effects in sentence production? A reply to Scontras, et al. (2015) Cognitive Science, 40. 513–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noord, Gertjan van, Gosse Bouma, Frank van Eynde, Daniël de Kok, Jelmar van der Linde, Ineke Schuurman, Erik Tjong Kim Sang, & Vincent Vandeghinste
2013Large scale syntactic annotation of written Dutch: Lassy. In Peter Spyns & Jan Odijk (eds.), Essential Speech and Language Technology for Dutch, 147–164. Springer, Berlin. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oostdijk, Nelleke, Martin Reynaert, Véronique Hoste & Ineke Schuurman
2013The construction of a 500-million-word reference corpus of contemporary written Dutch. In Peter Spyns & Jan Odijk (eds.), Essential speech and language technology for Dutch, 219–247. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stegmann, Rosemary, Heike Telljohann & Erhard W. Hinrichs
2000Stylebook for the German Treebank in Verbmobil. Saarbrücken: DFKI Report 239.Google Scholar
Wahlster, Wolfgang
(ed.) 2000Verbmobil: Foundations of speech-to-speech translation. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kempen, Gerard & Karin Harbusch
2019. Mutual attraction between high-frequency verbs and clause types with finite verbs in early positions: corpus evidence from spoken English, Dutch, and German. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 34:9  pp. 1140 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.