Chapter published in:
Crossroads Semantics: Computation, experiment and grammar
Edited by Hilke Reckman, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Maarten Hijzelendoorn and Rint Sybesma
[Not in series 210] 2017
► pp. 155176
References

References

Adriaens, Leon M. H.
1991Ein Modell Deutscher Intonation. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven dissertation.Google Scholar
Auran, Cyril & Rudy Loock
2006Appositive relative clauses and their prosodic realization in spoken discourse: A corpus study of phonetic aspects in British English. In Candy Sidner, John Harpur, Anton Benz & Peter Kühnlein (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Constraints in Discourse, 117–124.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina
2002Headed relatives in generative syntax – Part 2. Glot International 6. 1–13.Google Scholar
Birkner, Karin
2008Relativ(satz)konstruktionen im gesprochenen Deutsch. Syntaktische, prosodische, semantische und pragmatische Aspekte. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
2008Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.0.43). http://​www​.praat​.org.
Brandt, Margareta
1990Weiterführende Nebensätze. Zu ihrer Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Chen, Aoju
2007Language-specificity in the perception of continuation intonation. In Carlos Gussenhoven & Tomas Riad (eds.), Tones and tunes II: Phonetic and behavioural studies in word and sentence prosody, 107–142. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, William E. & Jeanne Paccia-Cooper
1980Syntax and speech. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dirksen, Arthur & Ludmila Menert
1999Fluency Speech Editor (Version 1.3). Utrecht: Fluency Speech Technology. http://​www​.fluency​.nl.
Emmonds, Joseph E.
1976A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fon, Yee-Jean J.
2002A cross-linguistic study on syntactic and discourse boundary cues in spontaneous speech. Columbus OH: Ohio State University dissertation.Google Scholar
Garro, Luisa & Frank Parker
1982Some suprasegmental characteristics of relative clauses in English. Journal of Phonetics 10. 149–161.Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther
1998Comparative intonational phonology: English and German. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen dissertation.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos, Toni Rietveld, Joop Kerkhoff & Jacques Terken
2003ToDI: Transcription of Dutch Intonation. http://​todi​.let​.kun​.nl.
Haan, Judith
2001Speaking of questions. An exploration of Dutch question intonation (LOT dissertation series 52). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Hart, Johan ’t, René Collier & Antonie Cohen
1990A perceptual study of intonation, an experimental-phonetic approach to speech melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, Daniel
1993Peak, boundary and cohesion characteristics of prosodic grouping. Working Papers of Lund University 41. 32–37.Google Scholar
Holler, Anke
2005Weiterführende Relativsätze. Empirische und theoretische Aspekte. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Kager, René
1988Plaatsing van zinsaccenten en pauzes in spraak [Location of sentence accents and pauses in speech]. In Marcel P. R. van den Broecke (ed.), Ter sprake: Spraak als betekenisvol geluid in 36 hoofdstukken, 416–427. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kaland, Constantijn C. L. & Vincent J. van Heuven
2010The structure-prosody interface of restrictive and appositive relative clauses in Dutch and German. Chicago IL: Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010 100064, 1–4.Google Scholar
Kan, Seda
2009Prosodic domains and the syntax-prosody mapping in Turkish. Bebek/Istanbul: Boğaziçi University MA Thesis.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1984Der Relativsatz. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Moulines, Eric & Werner Verhelst
1995Time-domain and frequency-domain techniques for prosodic modification of speech. In W. Bastiaan Kleijn & Kuldip K. Paliwal (eds.), Speech coding and synthesis, 519–555. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Neijt, Anneke
1991Universele fonologie. Een inleiding in de klankleer [Universal phonology. An introduction to sound structure]. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel
1985Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, Sibout G., Brokx, Jan P. L. & Jacobus J. de Rooij
1978Contributions of prosody to speech perception. In Willem J. M. Levelt & Giovanni B. Flores d’Arcais (eds.), Studies in the perception of language, 75–107. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2003The logic of conventional implicatures. Los Angeles CA: University of California Los Angeles dissertation.Google Scholar
Rialland, Annie
2007Question prosody: an African perspective. In Carlos Gussenhoven & Tomas Riad (eds.), Tunes and Tones, Volume 1: Typological studies in word and sentence prosody, 35–62. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rijpma, Enneus. & Schuringa, Frans G.
1972Nederlandse spraakkunst. (24th ed.). Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Rooij, Jacobus J. de
1979Speech punctuation. Utrecht: Utrecht University dissertation.Google Scholar
Schaffranietz, Brigitte
1999Relativsätze in aufgabenorientierten Dialogen: Funktionale Aspekte ihrer Prosodie und Pragmatik in Sprachproduktion und Sprachrezeption. Bielefeld: Universität Bielefeld dissertation.Google Scholar
Schubö, Fabian, Anna Roth, Viviana Haase & Caroline Féry
2015Experimental investigations on the prosodic realization of restrictive and appositive relative clauses in German. Lingua 154. 65–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
2005Comments on Intonational Phrasing in English. In Sonia Frota, Marina Vigario & M. João Freitas (eds.), Prosodies: Selected papers from the Phonetics and Phonology in Iberia Conference 2003, 11–58. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
2005A short report on intonation phrase boundaries in German. Linguistische Berichte 203. 273–296.Google Scholar
Vries, Mark de
2000Appositive relative clauses. In Helen de Hoop & Ton van der Wouden (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2000 (Linguistics in the Netherlands 17), 221–231. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar