Chapter published in:
“All families and genera”: Exploring the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts
Edited by Isabel Moskowich, Inés Lareo and Gonzalo Camiña
[Not in series 237] 2021
► pp. 148167
Works cited

Works cited

Anthony, Laurence
2018AntConc (Version 3.5.7) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved January 20, 2020, from http://​www​.laurenceanthony​.net​/software
Arakelyan, Rouzanna and Muradyan, Gevorg
2016Language as an Influential Tool for Persuasion. Armenian Folia Anglistika, 1/15: 39–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Argamon, Shlomo, Moshe Koppel; Fine, Jonathan and Shimoni, Anat Rachel
2003Gender, Genre, and Writing Style in Formal Written Texts. Text, 23/3: 321–346.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight
1999Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barsaglini-Castro, Anabella, Valcarce, Daniel
2020The Coruña Corpus Tool: Ten Years On. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 64: 13–19.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1997Genre-mixing in academic introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 16/3: 181–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Conrad, Susan
2001 “Register variation: A corpus approach”. In Schiffrin, Deborah; Tannen, Deborah and Hamilton, Heidi (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. 175–96.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas; Johansson, Stig; Leech, Geoffrey; Conrad, Susan and Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah
1992Feminism and Linguistic Theory. Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, McAlinden, Fiona and O’Leary, Kathy
1989 “Lakoff in context: the social and linguistic functions of tag questions”. In Cameron, Deborah. and Coates, Jennifer (eds.), Women in Their Speech Communities: new perspectives on language and sex. London; New York: Longman. 74–93.Google Scholar
Connor, Ulla. and Upton, Thomas
2003 “Linguistic Dimensions of Direct Mail Letters”. In Leystina, Pepi and Meyer, Charles F. (eds.), Corpus Analysis. Language Structure and Language Use. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 71–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crespo, Begoña
2016On writing Science in the Age of Reason. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses (RCEI), 72: 53–78.Google Scholar
2019 “How intimate was the tone of female history writing in the Modern period? Evidence from the Corpus of History English Texts”. In Moskowich, Isabel; Crespo, Begoña; Puente-Castelo, Luis and Monaco, Leida Maria (eds.), Writing history in Late Modern English: Explorations of the Coruña Corpus. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 186–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dillard, James Pryce
2014 “Language style and persuasion”. In Holtgraves, Thomas (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 177–187.Google Scholar
Gregory, Emily Lovira
1895Elements of Plant Anatomy. Boston, London: Published by Ginn & company.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
1988 “On the Language of Physical Science”. In Ghadessy, Mohsen (ed.), Registers of Written English: Situational Factors and Linguistic Features. (OLS). London: Pinter. 162–178.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2005Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7/2: 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
2015Genre, Discipline and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19: 32–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Dan
(ed.) 1986The Age of Science. The Scientific World-View in the Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1975Language and Women’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Lareo, Inés; Monaco, Leida Maria; Esteve-Ramos, María José and Moskowich, Isabel
(comps.) 2020The Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts (CELiST). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mischke, G. Elizabeth
2005Analysing involvement in distance-education study-guides: an appraisal-based approach. UNISA. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://​uir​.unisa​.ac​.za​/bitstream​/handle​/10500​/1864​/00front​.pdf​?sequence​=3
Moskowich, Isabel. and Crespo, Begoña
2014Stance is present in scientific writing, indeed. Evidence from the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. Token. A Journal of English Linguistics, 3: 91–114.Google Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel
2021 “The making of CELiST, a bunch of disciplines”. In Moskowich, Isabel; Lareo, Inés and Camiña, Gonzalo (eds.), “All families and genera”: Exploring the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel; Camiña-Riobóo, Gonzalo; Lareo, Inés and Crespo, Begoña
(comps.) 2018Corpus of English Philosophy Texts (CEPhiT). A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Keefe, Daniel J.
1990Current communication: An advanced text series, Vol. 2. Persuasion: Theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Perloff, Richard M.
2003The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communication and Attitudes in the Twenty-First Century. UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishing.Google Scholar
Pratt, Anne
1840Flowers and their Associations. London: Charles Knight and Co.Google Scholar
Prelli, Lawrence J.
1989The rhetorical construction of scientific ethos. In Simon, Herbert W. (ed.), Rhetoric in the human science. London: Sage. 87–104.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph; Greenbaum, Sidney; Leech, Geoffrey and Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Smellie, William
1790The philosophy of natural history. Vol. I. Dublin: printed by William Porter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, John
1990Genre Analysis English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma
1994 “On the Evolution of Scientific Writings between 1375 and 1675: Repertoire of Emotive Features”. In Fernández, Francisco et al. (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Valencia, Sept. 1992 Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 329–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1993 “The Relativity of Linguistic Strategies: Rethinking Power and Solidarity in Gender and Dominance”. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 165–188.Google Scholar
Wakefield, Priscilla
1816An introduction to the Natural History and Classification of Insects, in a series of familiar Letters. With Illustrative Engravings. London: printed for Darton, Harvey and Darton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar