Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) of CLIL pedagogy and globalisation in Japan
ShigeruSasajima & BarryKavanagh
CLIL Institute for Teacher Education | Tohoku University
Abstract
The paper discusses the potential of CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) pedagogy in the current
practice of ELT (English Language Teaching) and the issues of global education from a viewpoint of DEI (diversity, equity, and
inclusion) in Japan. DEI into CLIL pedagogy ensures a variety of learning environments, appropriate CLIL learning, and a sense of
belonging. CLIL can also provide better ideas and resources to cultivate DEI. This paper therefore argues that CLIL pedagogy has
the potential to change and incorporate issues related to DEI. The Japan CLIL Pedagogy Association (J-CLIL) conducted a
questionnaire survey on CLIL and its sponsored events and activities in 2021. Results show that: (1) many teachers are not aware
of DEI; (2) their mindset can become gradually diverse; (3) current education lacks equity with respect to students; and (4)
inclusive education is still not satisfactory. Ensuring equity in DEI is crucial in the realm of CLIL teacher education.
Therefore, it is imperative for CLIL teacher education to be more attuned to DEI concerns to enhance the implementation of CLIL
practices effectively. The DEI process needs to be integrated into CLIL and globalisation within the Japanese context. For that
purpose, there needs to be more research and practice necessary to promote a CLIL type of languages-integrated learning, and this
paper argues that it can be done through the IMT (Integrated Multifunctional Teacher) development program in Japan.
All people in Japan ‘shall have the right to receive an equal education corresponding to their ability, as provided by law’
(Article 26 of the Constitution of Japan). However, exclusively teaching in Japanese as the national language in schools may result in
some children not having the opportunity to develop their own knowledge and skills, such as their heritage languages (cf. Montrul & Polinsky, 2022). Nevertheless, the Common European Framework of Reference for
Languages (CEFR) (2001) has exerted significant influence on Japan’s language policy, as well as that of other countries (e.g., Negishi, 2012; Nishimura-Sahi, 2020; Stew, 2018), gradually prompting changes in Japanese society’s approach to language learning
in terms of equality and equity. While globalisation or global education has been advanced through English language teaching (ELT)
(e.g., Kubota, 2015; Murata, 2019; Nakamura, 2016, 2017), the concepts of
plurilingualism and pluriculturalism (Council of Europe, 2001) have not been given adequate
consideration. In Japan, primary and secondary education have predominantly focused on providing Japanese as the national language and
English as a global language to students. This emphasis may suggest that global education in Japan lacks diverse perspectives,
equitable methodologies, and inclusive practices, particularly within the realm of language education. This paper, therefore, aims to
discuss the potential of CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) pedagogy within the current practice of ELT from a viewpoint
of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), which is equal in meaning to EDI (equity, diversity, and inclusion) or IDE (inclusion,
diversity, and equity) as outlined in this paper. DEI is defined as ‘the idea that all people should have equal rights and treatment
and be welcomed and included so that they do not experience any disadvantage because of belonging to a particular group, and that each
person should be given the same opportunities as others according to their needs’ (https://dictionary.cambridge.org). In order to better improve global education, we need to have a flexible mindset for it,
especially in the context of complicated global issues: e.g., conflicts and wars in many regions, such as Iraq, Syria, Sudan,
Afghanistan, Myanmar, and Ukraine. The redefinition of globalisation is essential, and global education should incorporate more
diverse viewpoints and a heightened commitment to fairness and justice, as well as inclusive attitudes and resilience. The landscape
of education is evolving into more intricate phases, prompting global education to embrace diverse, equitable, and inclusive
philosophies, along with a focus on comprehensive knowledge and skills in critical thinking. Consequently, when addressing global
education in Japan, it becomes imperative to factor in DEI principles, as well as CLIL.
References
Airey, J.
(2016) Content
and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) and English for Academic Purposes
(EAP). In K. Hyland. & P. Shaw (Eds.), Routledge
Handbook of English for Academic
Purposes (pp. 71–83). London: Routledge.
Azevedo, J. P., Wagner, D., Rogers, F. H., Cloutier, M. H., Chakroun, B., Chang, G. C., & Mizunoya, S.
(Eds.) (2020) The
Handbook of Asian Englishes. New York: John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.
Brown, H.
(2014) Contextual
factors driving the growth of undergraduate English-medium instruction programmes at universities in
Japan. The Asian Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 1(1), 50–63.
Bruner, J.
(1996) The
Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
Bruton, A.
(2013) CLIL:
Some of the Reasons Why … and Why
Not. System, 41, 587–597.
Bruton, A.
(2015) CLIL:
Detail Matters in the Whole Picture. More Than a Reply to J. Hüttner & U. Smit.
(2014). System, 53, 119–128.
Bruton, A.
(2019) Questions
About CLIL Which are Unfortunately Still not Outdated: A Reply to Pérez-Cañado. Applied
Linguistics
Review, 10 (4), 591–602.
Butler, Y. G.
(2007) Factors associated with the notion that native speakers are ideal language teachers: an examination of elementary school teachers in Japan. JALT journal, 29 (1). 7–40.
Carrió-Pastor, M. L.
(2021) CLIL
vs EMI: Different approaches or the same dog with a different
collar? In M. L. Carrió-Pastor & B. Bellés-Fortuño (Eds.), Teaching
language and content in multicultural and multilingual classrooms. Palgrave
Macmillan. 13–30.
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, G.
(2014) Critical
Analysis of CLIL Taking Stock and Looking Forward. Applied
Linguistics, 35 (3), 243–262.
(2001) Common European
Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching,
Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Coyle, D.
(1999) Supporting
students in content and language integrated learning contexts: Planning for effective
classrooms. In J. Masih (Ed.), Learning
through a Foreign Language: Models, Methods and
Outcomes (pp. 46–62). London: CILT.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D.
(2010) CLIL
Content and Language Integrated
Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Dafouz, E. & Smit, U.
(2016) Towards
a Dynamic Conceptual Framework for English-Medium Education in Multilingual University
Settings. Applied
Linguistics, 37(3), 397–415.
Dafouz, E., & Smit, U.
(2019) ROAD-MAPPING
English Medium Education in the Internationalised
University. Cham: Palgrave
Pivot.
Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2011) Content-and-language
integrated learning: from practice to principles?Annual Review of applied
linguistics, 31, 182–204.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F. & Nikula, T.
(2014) You
can stand under my umbrella. Immersion, CLIL and Bilingual Education. A response to Cenoz, Genesee & Gorter
(2013), Applied
Linguistics, 35(2), 213–218.
Davies, A.
(2003) The Native Speaker: Myth and Reality. London: Cromwell Press Ltd..
Fenton-Smith, B., Humphreys, P., & Walkinshaw, I.
(Eds.) (2017) English
Medium Instruction in Higher Education in
Asia-Pacific. Springer.
Garcia, O.
(2009) Bilingual
education in the 21st century: a global perspective. Oxford,
UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Gilanyi, L., Gao, X., & Wang, S.
(2023) EMI and CLIL in Asian schools: A scoping review of empirical research between 2015 and 2022. Heliyon, 9.
Global Education Monitoring Report
Team
(2023) Global education monitoring report, 2023: technology in education: a
tool on whose
terms?Paris: UNESCO.
Graddol, D.
(2006) English
Next: Why Global English May Mean the End of ‘English as a Foreign
Language’. UK: British
Council.
Holliday, A. R.
(2005) The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hughes, C.
(2021) Education
and
Elitism. London: Routledge.
Hüttner, J. & Smit, U.
(2014) CLIL
(content and language integrated learning): The bigger picture. A response to: A. Bruton. 2013. CLIL: Some of the reasons why…
and why
not. System41 (2013): 587–597. System, 44, 160–167.
(2019) The
Role of English Education in Japan. Memoirs of Learning Utility Center for Konan University
Students, 4. 21–31.
Kavanagh, B.
(2016) Native
speakerism and English language education in Japan. Bulletin of the Institute for Excellence in
Higher Education Tohoku
University, 2, 201–209.
Kavanagh, B.
(2023) A
CLIL Course on Karate and Japanese Culture: Developing Intercultural Awareness and Language
Learning. In T. Muller, J. Adamson, S. Herder, & P. S. Brown (Eds.), Re-Envisioning
EFL Education in
Asia. Sheridan (pp. 43–59). WY: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Kerr, K. & Ainscow, M.
(2017) Equity
in Education: Time to stop and think. A report on the state of equity in the English education
system. Manchester: The University of
Manchester.
Kirkpatrick, A.
(2017) Language
education policy among the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). European Journal of
Language Policy.
Kirkpatrick, A. & Lixun, W.
(Eds.) (2021) Is
English an Asian Language?Queensland, Hong
Kong: Cambridge University Press.
Kubota, R.
(2015) Globalization
and Language Education in Japan. In N.
Van Deusen-Scholl, & S. May (Eds.), Second
and Foreign Language Education. Encyclopedia of Language and
Education. Cham: Springer.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E.
(1991) Situated
learning. Legitimate peripheral
participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge
Press.
Lin, A. & Man, E.
(2009) Bilingual
Education: Southeast Asian Perspectives. Hong Kong: Hong
Kong University Press.
Llinares, A. & Cross, R.
(2022) New
challenges for CLIL research. AILA
Review, 35(2), 169–179.
Long, M. H.
(1981) Input,
interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native
language and foreign language
acquisition379 (pp. 259–278). New
York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Madrid, D., & Pérez
Cañado, M. L.
(2018) Innovations
and Challenges in Attending to Diversity Through CLIL. Theory Into
Practice, 57 (3), 241–249.
Maljers, A., Marsh, D., & Wolff, D.
(2007) Windows
on CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in the European Spotlight. The
Hague: European Platform for Dutch Education.
Marsh, D.
(2002) CLIL/EMILE
— the European dimension: actions, trends and foresight
potential. Brussels: European
Commission.
(2008) Uncovering
CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual
Education. Oxford: Macmillan
Education.
Mensel, L. V., Hiligsmann, P., Mettewie, L., & Galand, B.
(2020) CLIL,
an elitist language learning approach? A background analysis of English and Dutch CLIL pupils in French-speaking
Belgium. Language, Culture and
Curriculum, 33(1), 1–14.
Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K., & Ting, T.
(2015) A
pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning — mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction
and meaning-making. Language, Culture and
Curriculum, 28(1), 41–57.
Montrul, S. A. & Polinsky, M.
(Eds.) (2022) The
Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics. (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and
Linguistics). Cambridge University Press.
Murata, K.
(2019) The
realities of the use of English in the globalised world and the teaching of English: a
discrepancy?JACET Journal
2019. 63, 7–26.
Nakamura, Y.
(2016) Globalization
of English and English language teaching in Asia. The Hiyoshi review of natural science Keio
University. Language, culture, and
communication, 48, 117–127.
Nakamura, Y.
(2017) Fundamental
Issues on the Globalization of English and English Language Teaching in Japan. Educational
Studies 59 International Christian
University, 177–182.
Negishi, M.
(2012) The
development of the CEFR-J: Where we are, where we are going. Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research Research Project Report, 105–116.
Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinates, A., & Lorenzo, F.
(2016) More
than content and language: the complexity of integration in CLIL and multilingual
education. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising
Integration in CLIL and Multilingual
Education. (pp. 1–25). Bristol: Multilingual
Matters.
Nikula, T., Skinnari, K., & Mård-Miettinen, K.
(2022) Diversity in CLIL as experienced by Finnish CLIL teachers and students: matters of equality and equity, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 26,(9), 1066–1079.
Nishimura-Sahi, O.
(2020) Policy
borrowing of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) in Japan: An analysis of the interplay between
global education trends and national policymaking. Asian Pacific Journal of
Education, 42 (3), 574–587.
(2020b) TALIS 2018 Results (Volume
II): Teachers and School Leaders as Valued
Professionals. Paris: TALIS, OECD
Publishing.
Ohmori, A.
(2014) Exploring
the Potential of CLIL in English Language Teaching in Japanese Universities: An Innovation for the Development of Effective
Teaching and Global Awareness. The Journal of Rikkyo University Language
Center, 32, 39–51.
(2017) Stopping
the “pendulum effect” in CLIL research: Finding the balance between Pollyanna and
Scrooge. Applied Linguistics
Review. 8(1), 79–99.
Pérez
Cañado, M. L.
(2023) Guest
editorial. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism. 26(9). 1015–1021,
Rose, H., Sahan, K., & Zhou, S.
(2022) Global
English Medium Instruction: Perspectives at the crossroads of Global Englishes and EMI. Asian
Englishes, 24(2), 160–172.
Sakamoto, M.
(2012) Moving
towards effective English language teaching in Japan: issues and challenges. Journal of
Multilingual and Multicultural
Development, 33(4), 409–420.
Sasajima, S.
(2008) CLIL
and LSP. Otsuka
Forum. 26, 50–56.
Sasajima, S.
(2014) An
Exploratory Study of Japanese EFL Teachers’
Kokoro. Verlag: LAP LAMBERT Academic
Publishing.
Sasajima, S.
(2019) Teacher
Development: J-CLIL. In K. Tsuchiya & M. D. Perez-Murillo. (eds.). Content
and Language Integrated Learning in Spanish and Japanese Contexts: Policy, Practice and
Pedagogy. Cham: Palgrave, 287–312.
Sasajima, S., Yamano, Y., Isobe, S., Machida, J., Sakamoto, H., Takizawa, M., Gidoin, K., Takahashi, N., Matsuura, Y., Okio, R., Kanbara, J., Ichiyanagi, K., Miyata, K., Pakula, H. M., & Wewer, T.
(2019) Manabi
wo Tsunagu Shogakko Gaikokugo Kyoiku no CLIL
Jissen. Tokyo: Sanshusha.
Sasajima, S.
(2020) Kyoiku
toshiteno CLIL (CLIL Pedagogy in
Japan). Tokyo: Sanshusha.
Sasajima, S., Lin, A. M. Y. & He, P., Yang, W., Harada, T., Tsuchiya, K., & Ikeda, M.
(2020) Featured
Article: Collaboration of CLIL pedagogy in Asia. The Journal of the Japan CLIL Pedagogy
Association
(JJCLIL)2, 7–38.
(1998) Qualitative
data analysis. (originally published as Qualitative Data Analysis in The Ethnograph v5.0: A
Users Guide, Appendix E, 1998, Colorado Springs,
CO: Qualis Research.) http://www.qualisresearch.com/qda_paper.htm
Smit, U. & Dafouz, E.
(2012) Integrating
content and language in higher education: An introduction to English-medium policies, conceptual issues and research practices
across Europe. AILA
Review, 25(1), 1–12.
Stew, M.
(2018) The
CEFR and English Education in Japan. Journal of Policy
Studies56. 33–38.
Tsuchiya, K., & Pérez
Murillo, M. D.
(Eds.) (2019) Content
and language integrated learning in Spanish and Japanese contexts: Policy, practice and
pedagogy. London: Palgrave
Macmillan.
(1994) Arfarniad o ddulliau dysgu ac addysgu yng nghyd-destun addysguwchradd
ddwyieithog [An evaluation of teaching and learning methods in the context
of bilingual secondary education]. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation. Bangor, UK: University of
Wales.
Vickers, E. & Un, L.
(2019) Editorial
— Asian perspectives on diversity and its implications for education. Asia Pacific Journal of
Education, 39(2), 159–164,
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1978) Mind
in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Yamanaka, S., Suzuki, K. H.
(2020) Japanese
Education Reform Towards Twenty-First Century Education. In F. M. Reimers. (eds.). Audacious
Education
Purposes. Springer, Cham.
Yoshida, A.
(2017) Global
Human Resource Development’ and Japanese University Education: ‘Localism’ in Actor
Discussions. Educational Studies in Japan: International
Yearbook, 11. 83–99.
Zein, S. & Butler, Y. G.
(2022) English for Young Learners in Asia: Challenges and Directions for Teacher Education. London: Routledge.