When do teachers gesture? Conditions affecting gesture production in video-mediated lexical explanations

Benjamin Holt
University of Lille

Video-mediated interaction is becoming increasingly common in foreign language education (O’Dowd, 2023), offering learners opportunities to develop oral skills through interaction with L1 speakers. Lexical explanation sequences are of particular interest in cognitive-interactionist research (Loewen & Sato, 2018) because they engage learners in focusing on both form and meaning (Long & Robinson, 1998).

Gestures play a key role in language learning in general (Stam & Tellier, 2022), and in lexical acquisition in particular (Macedonia et al., 2019), both in face-to-face (Tellier et al., 2021) and video-mediated contexts (Holt, 2020). However, webcam framing limits gesture visibility (Guichon & Wigham, 2016), forcing teachers to adapt. While some research has examined gesture production during teacher- or learner-initiated negotiation in face-to-face settings (Inceoglu & Loewen, 2022), little is known about this relationship in video-mediated contexts.

This study addresses that gap by analyzing 305 lexical explanation sequences from the ISMAEL corpus (Guichon & Tellier, 2017), focusing on the relationship between gesture production by pre-service teachers and the initiator of the sequence, the presence of visible incomprehension, the type of lexical difficulty (comprehension vs. production), and the grammatical category of the lexical item. Results show that gestures are significantly more likely when learners visibly display incomprehension, and when the difficulty is related to comprehension. These findings highlight the importance of gesture use during video-mediated teaching, especially during lexical explanation sequences and in response to signs of learner incomprehension.

Publication history
Table of contents

Foreign language teaching has taken place in video-mediated settings since the end of the 1990s, and has grown in importance and popularity ever since (O’Dowd, 2023). In parallel with this growth, researchers have increasingly investigated numerous pedagogical aspects involved in video-mediated interaction (Guichon & Tellier, 2017; Satar & Wigham, 2023). One critical aspect of teaching via videoconferencing platforms is making one’s gestures visible to the webcam (Guichon & Wigham, 2016; Holt, 2024a, 2024b). Previous studies have shown that teachers make their gestures visible to the webcam during lexical explanation sequences — in which a lexical item is discussed, defined, or explained — in order to manage the different phases involved in a sequence from opening to closing (Wigham, 2017), or to focus on specific aspects of a lexical item’s form, meaning, or usage, often while directly involving the learners in the explanation process (Holt, 2020, 2021). Some studies have attempted to determine a link between certain factors, such as the presence or absence of manifested incomprehension, or the initiator of the sequence (i.e., the teacher or the learner), and the presence of teacher-produced gestures. One of these exploratory studies suggested that the presence of manifested incomprehension did not lead to increased visible gesture production by teachers in a video-mediated learning environment (Holt et al., 2015). Another study conducted in a face-to-face classroom setting suggested that teachers are more likely to produce gestures when focus on form is initiated by a learner (Inceoglu, 2015). Inceoglu & Loewen (2022) pointed out that more studies are necessary in video-mediated settings to determine what factors might contribute to teacher gesture production during corrective feedback episodes. To our knowledge, no study has used inferential statistics to examine whether the initiator of a lexical explanation sequence — the teacher or the learner — affects gesture production in a video-mediated context. The current study aims to address this specific research gap by determining whether certain factors — such as the initiator of the sequence, the presence of manifested incomprehension, the type of incomprehension, and the type of lexical item — are associated with gesture production by pre-service French teachers during lexical explanation sequences that occur naturally during video-mediated task-based language teaching.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Belhiah, H.
(2013) Using the Hand to Choreograph Instruction: On the Functional Role of Gesture in Definition Talk. The Modern Language Journal, 97 (2), 417–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blake, R.
(2000) Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4 (1), 111–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Canals, L.
(2021) Multimodality and translanguaging in negotiation of meaning. Foreign Language Annals, 54 (3), 647–670. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, H.-I., Sevilla-Pavón, A., & de València, U.
(2023) Negotiation of meaning via virtual exchange in immersive virtual reality environments. Language Learning & Technology, 27 (2), 118–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conklin, K., Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Carrol, G.
(2018) Eye-tracking: A Guide for Applied Linguistics Research. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cosnier, J., & Develotte, C.
(2011) Le face à face en ligne, approche éthologique. In C. Develotte, R. Kern, & M.-N. Lamy (Eds.), Décrire la conversation en ligne, Le face à face distanciel (p. 27–50). ENS Éditions. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M.
(2006) Paralinguistic Focus on Form. TESOL Quarterly, 40 (4), 841. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Gaulmyn, M.-M.
(1991) Expliquer des explications. In U. Dausendschön-Gay, E. Gülich, & U. Krafft (Eds.), Linguistische Interaktionsanalysen (p. 279–314). Max Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Pietro, J.-F., Matthey, M., & Py, B.
(1989) Acquisition et contrat didactique: Les séquences potentiellement acquisitionnelles dans la conversation exolingue. Actes du troisième colloque régional de linguistique, 99–119. http://​mepa​.free​.fr​/STAGE​.MEPA​.II​/planning​_fichiers​/BIBLIO​.Actvite​_fichiers​/DE%20PIETRO%201989​.pdf
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V.
(1969) The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, and coding. Semiotica, 1 , 49–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A.
(1994) Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language learning, 44 (3), 449–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fasel Lauzon, V.
(2014) Comprendre et apprendre dans l’interaction: Les séquences d’explication en classe de français langue seconde. Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferguson, C.
(1975) Towards a characterization of English foreigner talk. Anthropological Linguistics, 17 (1), 1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galisson, R.
(1991) De la langue à la culture par les mots. CLE Internationale.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groot, P.
(2000) Computer assisted second language vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 4 (1), 60–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guichon, N., Bétrancourt, M., & Prié, Y.
(2012) Managing written and oral negative feedback in a synchronous online teaching situation. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 25 (2), 181–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guichon, N., & Tellier, M.
(Eds.) (2017) Enseigner l’oral en ligne: Une approche multimodale. Les Éditions Didier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guichon, N., & Wigham, C. R.
(2016) A semiotic perspective on webconferencing-supported language teaching. ReCALL, 28 (1), 62–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gülich, E.
(1990) L’approche ethnométhodologique dans l’analyse du français parlé. In M. Charolles, S. Fisher, & J. Jayez (Eds.), Le discours: Représentations et interprétations (p. 71–109). Presses Universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatch, E. M.
(1978) Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. M. Hatch (Éd.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (p. 401–435). Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holt, B.
(2018) Séquences d’explication lexicale dans l’enseignement du français par visioconférence: Une approche multimodale. Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020) Le rôle des gestes dans les explications lexicales par visioconférence. TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage, 36 . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021) Explaining different aspects of word knowledge: A multimodal analysis of lexical explanation sequences during online French tutoring sessions. Lexis, 18 . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024a) A comparison of gesture production in L1 and L2 during video-mediated task-based teletandem interaction. In A. Brown & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Multimodality across Epistemologies in Second Language Research (p. 153–169). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024b) Impact de la formation sur la visibilité des gestes lors de l’interaction exolingue par visioconférence: Une exploration méthodologique. Faits de Langues, 53 (2), 235–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holt, B., & Tellier, M.
(2017) Conduire des explications lexicales. In N. Guichon & M. Tellier (Eds.), Enseigner l’oral en ligne (p. 59–90). Didier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holt, B., Tellier, M., & Guichon, N.
(2015) The use of teaching gestures in an online multimodal environment: The case of incomprehension sequences. Gesture and Speech in Interaction 4th Edition, 149–154. https://​hal​.archives​-ouvertes​.fr​/hal​-01215770/
Inceoglu, S.
(2015) Teacher Gesture and Lexical Focus on Form in a Foreign Language Classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 71 (2), 130–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inceoglu, S., & Loewen, S.
(2022) Analyzing nonverbal corrective feedback. In G. Stam & K. Urbanski (Eds.), Gesture and Multimodality in Second Language Acquisition: A Research Guide (p. 26–47). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, S. D., McDevitt, T., & Esch, M.
(2009) Brief training with co-speech gesture lends a hand to word learning in a foreign language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24 (2), 313–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazaraton, A.
(2004) Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher: A microanalytic inquiry. Language learning, 54 (1), 79–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Little, D., & Brammerts, H.
(Eds.) (1996) A guide to language learning in tandem via the Internet. CLCS Occasional paper n° 46. Center for Language and Communication Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loewen, S., & Sato, M.
(2018) Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51 (3), 285–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M.
(1981) Input, interaction, and second-language acquisition. Native Language and Foreign Language Acquisition, 379 , 259–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1983) Linguistic and Conversational Adjustments to Non-Native Speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5 (02), 177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991) Focus on Form: A Design Feature in Language Teaching Methodology. In K. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective (p. 39–52). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. H., & Robinson, P.
(1998) Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lüdi, G.
(1991) Construire ensemble les mots pour le dire. A propos de l’origine discursive des connaissances lexicales. In U. Dausendschön-Gay, E. Gülich, & U. Krafft (Eds.), Linguistische Interaktionsanalysen (p. 193–224). Max Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macedonia, M.
(2014) Bringing back the body into the mind: Gestures enhance word learning in foreign language. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macedonia, M., & Klimesch, W.
(2014) Long-Term Effects of Gestures on Memory for Foreign Language Words Trained in the Classroom: Long-Term Effects of Gestures on Memory for Words. Mind, Brain, and Education, 8 (2), 74–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macedonia, M., Repetto, C., Ischebeck, A., & Mueller, K.
(2019) Depth of Encoding Through Observed Gestures in Foreign Language Word Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 10 . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macedonia, M., & von Kriegstein, K.
(2012) Gestures enhance foreign language learning. Biolinguistics, 6 , 393–416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, M.
(1991) Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonough, K., & Sunitham, W.
(2009) Collaborative dialogue between Thai EFL learners during self-access computer activities. TESOL quarterly, 43 (2), 231–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D.
(1992) Hand and Mind. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P.
(2013) Learning Vocabulary in Another Language, Second Edition (Cambridge University Press). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P., & Webb, S.
(2011) Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Heinle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicolaev, V.
(2010) Les négociations de sens dans un dispositif d’apprentissage des langues en ligne synchrone par visioconférence. Les Cahiers de l’Acedle, 7 (2), 169–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R.
(2023) Internationalising Higher Education and the Role of Virtual Exchange. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pica, T.
(1994) Research on Negotiation: What Does It Reveal About Second-Language Learning Conditions, Processes, and Outcomes? Language learning, 44 (3), 493–527. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C.
(1987) The impact of interaction on comprehension. Tesol Quarterly, 21 (4), 737–758. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinn-Allen, L.
(1995) The effects of emblematic gestures on the development and access of mental representations of French expressions. The Modern Language Journal, 79 (4), 521–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renner, J.
(2017) Negotiation of meaning and language-related episodes in synchronous, audio-based Chinese-German eTandem. Language Learning in Higher Education, 7 , 137–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
RStudio Team
(2020) RStudio: Integrated Development for R [Logiciel]. http://​www​.rstudio​.com
Satar, M., & Wigham, C.
(2023) Instruction Giving in Online Language Lessons: A Multimodal (Inter)action Analysis. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H.
(1977) The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation. Language, 53 (2), 361–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W.
(1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied linguistics, 11 (2), 129–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sindoni, M. G.
(2013) Spoken and Written Discourse in Online Interactions: A Multimodal Approach. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, B.
(2003) The use of communication strategies in computer-mediated communication. System, 31 (1), 29–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005) The Relationship Between Negotiated Interaction, Learner Uptake, and Lexical Acquisition in Task-Based Computer-Mediated Communication. Tesol Quarterly, 39 (1), 33–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stam, G., & McCafferty, S.
(2008) Gesture Studies and Second Language Acquisition: A Review. In S. McCafferty & G. Stam (Eds.), Gesture: Second Language Acquisition and Classroom Research (p. 3–24). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stam, G., & Tellier, M.
(2017) The sound of silence: The functions of gestures in pauses in native and non-native interaction. In R. B. Church, M. W. Alibali, & S. D. Kelly (Eds.), Gesture Studies (Vol. 7, p. 353–377). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022) Gesture Helps Second and Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. In A. Morgenstern & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Gesture in Language: Development Across the Lifespan (p. 335–363). APA/Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swain, M.
(1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (p. 235–252). Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In Principles and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H.G. Widdowson (p. 125–144). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tellier, M.
(2008a) Dire avec des gestes. Le français dans le monde. Recherche et applications, 44 , 40–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b) The effect of gestures on second language memorisation by young children. Gesture, 8 (2), 219–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014) Quelques orientations méthodologiques pour étudier la gestuelle dans des corpus spontanés et semi-contrôlés. Discours, 15 . http://​discours​.revues​.org​/8917
(2022) Saisir les potentialités pédagogiques de son corps: De l’enseignant novice à l’enseignant expérimenté. In H. Duval, C. Raymond, & D. Odier-Guedj (Eds.), Engager le corps pour enseigner et apprendre: Diversité de perspectives (p. 123–152). Presses de l’Université Laval. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tellier, M., & Cadet, L.
(2014) Le corps et la voix de l’enseignant: Théorie et pratique. Éditions Maison des Langues.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tellier, M., Stam, G., & Ghio, A.
(2021) Handling language: How future language teachers adapt their gestures to their interlocutor. Gesture, 20 (1), 30–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uskokovic, B., & Talehgani-Nikazm, C.
(2022) Talk and Embodied Conduct in Word Searches in Video-Mediated Interactions. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 5 (1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Zwaard, R., & Bannink, A.
(2019) Toward a comprehensive model of negotiated interaction in computer-mediated communication. Language Learning & Technology, 23 (3), 116–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S.
(1985) Non-native/Non-native Conversations: A Model for Negotiation of Meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6 (1), 71–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Y.
(2006) Negotiation of Meaning in Desktop Videoconferencing-Supported Distance Language Learning. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 18 (1), 122–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wigham, C. R.
(2017) A multimodal analysis of lexical explanation sequences in webconferencing-supported language teaching. Language Learning in Higher Education, 7 (1), 81–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A., & Sloetjes, H.
(2006) ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), 1556–1559. http://​pubman​.mpdl​.mpg​.de​/pubman​/item​/escidoc:60436:2​/component​/escidoc:60437​/LREC%202006​_Elan​_Wittenburg​.pdf
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-dark jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-light jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold prag Twitter_Logo_Blue