Publications

Publication details [#21680]

Eemeren, Frans H. Van, Rob Grootendorst, J.Anthony Blair and Charles A. Williard, eds. 1991. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation, organized by the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA) at the University of Amsterdam, June 19-22, 1990. SICSAT, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation. viii + 1252 pp.
Publication type
Book – edited volume
Publication language
English

Articles in this volume

Jasinski, James. Argument, judgment, and the problem of alienation. 189–201
Brandt, P.-Y., G. Quiroz and D. Apothéloz. Towards a formalization of argumentative negation. 218–225
May, J.D. Practical arguments. 259–266
Vignaux, Georges. A cognitive model of argumentation. 303–310
Morris, Anthony. Two conceptions of rule underlying speech act theory. 321–329
Grennan, Wayne. An unrecognized part of the informal logic program. 348–353
Snoeck-Henkemans, Francisca. The analysis of dialogical elements in argumentative texts. 364–370
Krabbe, Erik C.W. Subtypes of persuasion dialogue and dialectical shifts. 371–376
Baaske, Kevin T. Analogic argument in public discourse: A reconsideration of the nature and function of analogy. 411–415
Eemeren, Frans H. Van and Rob Grootendorst. Making the best of argumentative discourse. 431–440
Koetsenruijter, Willem M. A strategy for the dialectical reconstruction of the confrontation stage. 441–447
Verbiest, Agnes E.M. A new supply of argumentative indicators? 448–454
Houtlosser, Peter. Negative propositions and negative standpoints. 455–461
Bilmes, Jack. Toward a theory of argument in conversation: The preference for disagreement. 462–469
Wilson, Steven R., Heindrika Meischke and Min-Sun Kim. A revised analysis of directives and face: Implications for argument and negotiation. 470–480
Gerritsen, Susanne. Problems of unexpressed premisses in writing argumentative texts. 481–486
Talmage, Stephen. `Implicit premises' and subsentential inference. 487–494
Ilatova, Zinaida. Types of implicit starting-points of argumentation. 495–497
Slot, Pauline. Reconstructing indirect speech acts. 498–505
Tarnay, Laszlo. On vagueness, truth, and argumentation. 506–514
Zagar, Igor Z. How to do things with words: The polyphonic way. 515–523
Mendenhall, V. Argumentative relations as features of argumentative discourse: Elements for an argument grammar. 524–529
Cascio, V. Lo. Proposals for an argumentative grammar. 530–545
Brutian, Georg and Hranoush Markarian. The language of argumentation. 546–550
Allen, Mike, Nancy Burrell, Edward Mabry and Paul Mineo. Coercion and argumentation: A reappaisal. 551–558
Brutian, Lilit. On the types of argumentative discourse. 559–563
Gordon, Betsy, Cathy Bast and Claudia Hale. Logic and argument development within the context of a dispute mediation. 575–581
Morris, Anthony W., David R. Seibold and Renee A. Meyers. The influence of individual differences in message production on argumentation in decision-making groups: Theoretical developments and propositions. 582–590
Adelswärd, V. The use of formulations in the production of arguments: A study of interviews with conscientious objectors. 591–603
Shahin, K.N. and J.F. Kess. Opposition in the discourse of argument. 604–610
Fiordo, Richard. The pragmatics of clash: Arguing selectively in systems. 611–618
Ganer, P.M., K.J. Congalton and C.D. Olson. Excuse making as argument: The reliance on Ebmos. 619–624
Hirsch, Richard. Belief and interactive argumentation. 625–630
Lundquist, Lita. How and when are written texts argumentative? 639–646
Jungslager, F.S. Identifying argumentation. 647–652
Kunst-Gnamus, Olga. An attempt at conceptualizing the difference between pragmatic and rational argumentation. 653–662
Oostdam, R.J. and M.H. Eiting. The measurement of receptive argumentation skills: The identification of points of view in signle and multiple disputes. 663–671
Xu, Shi. Contradistinctive argumentation and its use in conversation. 696–708
Grindsted, Annette. Argumentative style in Spanish and Danish negation interaction. 725–733
Edwards, A.R. Communicative strategies in policy and planning situations: A theoretical framework based on the speech act theory. 828–833
Primatarova-Miltcheva, Antoinette and Mikhail Nedeltchev. Restraints on the development from totalitarian propaganda towards an argumentative discourse. 859–866
Grazia Forcella, Maria. How to do things (and lead people) with arguments: An analysis on communication in management from a semiotic hypothesis on argumentation. 890–895
Pander Maat, Henk L.W. Arguing unstated conclusions: Analyzing the place of argumentation in job applications. 896–906
Komlosi, L.I. The power and fallability of a paradigm in argumentation: A case study of subversive political discourse. 994–1005
Clark, J.E. Defining the intifada: Argumentation in media coverage. 1006–1012
Lucaites, John Louis and Celeste Michelle Condit. The rhetoric of `equality' and the expatriation of African-Americans, 1776-1826: A case study of the `rhetorical effect' of ideological argumentation. 1028–1035
Winebrenner, T.C. Assertions, assumptions, and impressions: A syntactic approach to teaching relevance. 1170–1177