Publications

Publication details [#50430]

Coufal, Kathy L., Mary J. Friehe, Melodee Landis and Kristine D. Swain. 2007. Evaluating Critical Thinking in Class and Online. Comparison of the Newman Method and the Facione Rubric. Communication Disorders Quarterly 28 (3) : 135–143.

Publication type

Article in journal

Publication language

English

Keywords

classroom conversation | discussion | evaluation | internet | research methods

Place, Publisher

SAGE Publications

Annotation

This study explores which method, the Newman or the Facione, most adequately evaluates students' critical thinking during in-class and online discussion, and how they compare in consistency and ease of use.