Publications
Publication details [#56091]
Koike, Dale April and J. César Félix-Brasdefer, eds. 2012. Pragmatic Variation in First and Second Language Contexts. Methodological issues. (IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society 31). John Benjamins.
Publication type
Book – edited volume
Publication language
English
Annotation
Departing from Schneider and Barron (2008), representing the emerging field of Variational Pragmatics, this volume examines pragmatic variation focusing on methods utilized to collect and analyze data in a variety of first (L1) and second (L2) language contexts. The objectives are to: (1) examine variation in such areas of pragmatics as speech acts, conventional expressions, metapragmatics, stance, frames, mitigation, communicative action, (im)politeness, and implicature; and (2) critically review central methodological concerns relevant for research in pragmatic variation, such as coding, ethical issues, qualitative and quantitative methods, and individual variation. Theoretical frameworks vary from variationist and interactional sociolinguistics, to variational pragmatics. This collection contains eleven papers by leading scholars, including two state-of-the art peapers on key methodological issues of pragmatic variation study.
Articles in this volume
Boxer, Diana and Weihua Zhu. Disagreement and sociolinguistic variables. English as a Lingua Franca of Practice in China.
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César. Pragmatic variation by gender in market service encounters in Mexico. 17–48
Blyth, Carl S. Cross-cultural stances in online discussions. Pragmatic variation in French and American ways of expressing opinions. 49–80
Flores-Ferrán, Nydia. Pragmatic variation in therapeutic discourse. An examination of mitigating devices employed by Dominican female clients and a Cuban American therapist. 81–112
Koike, Dale April. Variation in NS-learner interactions. Frames and expectations in pragmatic coconstruction. 175–208
Woodfield, Helen. Pragmatic variation in learner perception. The role of retrospective verbal report in L2 speech act research. 209–238