By looking at both apologies made in everyday conversation and those made by politicians in public, this paper aims to provide a full set of felicity conditions for the speech act of apology. It also discusses how refinements to previously proposed categories of apology strategies are needed to accurately describe how (British) politicians apologise. The study endeavours to show that with these refinements, the speech act approach to apologies is applicable to those of a political nature, as well as those in everyday conversation. Using these developments, the paper analyses how Members of the U.K. Parliament apologise for a variety of offences. This analysis shows that MPs make more fulsome apologies than the apologies found in everyday conversation. The type of offence has an effect on how an MP apologises, with apologies for financial irregularities being the more detailed and making use of more conventional strategies than other apologies.