Publications

Found 20 recordsSort by Active filters:
Apel, Karl-Otto. 1979. Sprechakttheorie und Begründung ethischer Normen: J.R. Searle's Versuch einer Ableitung des Sollens aus dem Sein im Lichte einer transzendentale Sprachpragmatik. In Lorenz, Kuno, ed. Konstruktionen versus Positionen: Beiträge zur Diskussion um die konstruktive Wissenschaftstheorie. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 37–106.
Babic, Jovan. 1977. Searleova teorija govornih akata i 'jeste-treba' pitanje. Filozofske Studije 9 : 151–208.
Sikora, R.I. 1975. Facts, promising, and obligation. Philosophy 50 : 353–355.
Gewirth, Alan. 1974. The 'is-ought' problem resolved. Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association 47 : 34–61.
Jaggar, Alison. 1974. It does not matter whether we can derive 'ought' from 'is'. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 : 373–379.
Perry, Thomas D. 1974. A refutation of Searle's ammended 'is-ought' argument. Analysis 34 : 133–139.
Franklin, R.L. 1973. Recent work on ethical naturalism. American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series 7 : 55–95.
Genova, A.C. 1973. Searle's use of 'ought'. Philosophical Studies 24 : 183–191.
Nesbitt, Winston. 1973. Performatives and the gap between 'is' and 'ought'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 : 165–170.
Oppenheim, Felix E. 1973. Facts and values in politics: Are they separable? Political Theory 1 : 54–68.
Ghosh, Samir K. 1972. Toward a grammar of greetings. Proceedings of the International Congress of Linguists/Actes du Congrès International des Linguistes 11 (1) : 545–559.
Kolenda, Konstantin. 1972. Searle's 'institutional facts'. The Personalist 53 (2) : 188–192.
Genova, A.C. 1971. Assertion and evaluation in Searle's theory of speech acts. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 2 : 65–72.
Holborow, Les. 1971. The commitment fallacy. Noûs 5 : 385–394.
Zemach, Eddy H. 1971. Ought, is, and a game called 'promise'. The Philosophical Quarterly 21 : 61–63.
Genova, A.C. 1970. Institutional facts and brute values. Ethics 81 : 36–54.
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Ofstad, Harold and Lars Bergström. 1965. A note on John R. Searle's derivation of 'ought' from 'is'. Inquiry 8 : 309–314.
Black, Max. 1964. The gap between 'Is' and 'Should'. The Philosophical Review 73 : 165–181.
Searle, John R. 1964. How to derive 'ought' from 'is'. The Philosophical Review 73 : 43–58.