Publications
Hamo, Michal and Chaim Noy. 2019. Stance-taking and participation framework in museum commenting platforms: On subjects, objects, authors, and principals. Language in Society 48 (2) : 285–308. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Balve, Johannes. 2014. Authorship, plagiarism and cooperation in higher education: Conclusions from experiences with Asian cultures and learning environments. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 24 (1) : 81–93. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Panther, Klaus-Uwe and Shuguang Li. 2014. ‘Author (date)’ constructions in academic discourse. English Text Construction 7 (2) : 215–248. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lee, Tong King. 2013. Author manifestation and perceptions of self in Chinese academic discourse: Comparisons with English. Languages in Contrast 13 (1) : 90–112. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Ireland, Molly E. and James W. Pennebaker. 2011. Using literature to understand authors: The case for computerized text analysis. Scientific Study of Literature 1 (1) : 34–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lorés-Sanz, Rosa. 2011. The construction of the author's voice in academic writing: the interplay of cultural and disciplinary factors. Text & Talk 31 (2) : 173–193. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lorés-Sanz, Rosa. 2009. Different worlds, different audiences: A contrastive analysis of research article abstracts. In Suomela-Salmi, Eija, ed. Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse. (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 193). John Benjamins. pp. 187–198. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Vigouroux, Cécile B. 2009. The making of a scription: a case study on authority and authorship. Text & Talk 29 (5) : 615–637. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Grant, Tim. 2008. Approaching questions in forensic authorship analysis. In Gibbons, John and M.Teresa Turell, eds. Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics. (AILA Applied Linguistics Series 5). John Benjamins. pp. 215–229. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Herriman, Jennifer. 2008. The interpersonal function of clefts in English and Swedish. Languages in Contrast 8 (2) : 143–160. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hyland, ken. 2008. Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing. English Text Construction 1 (1) : 5–22. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Janssen, Anna and Tamar Murachver. 2005. Readers’ Perceptions of Author Gender and Literary Genre. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 24 (2) : 207–219. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kohrs Campbell, Karlyn. 2005. Agency: Promiscuous and Protean. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 2 (1) : 1–19. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Coulthard, M. 2004. Author Identification, Idiolect, and Linguistic Uniqueness. Applied Linguistics 25 (4) : 431–447. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Cover, Rob. 2004. New media theory: electronic games, democracy and reconfiguring the author-audience relationship. Social Semiotics 14 (2) : 173–191. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Goss, Brian Michael. 2004. Steven Soderbergh's The Limey: Implications for the Auteur Theory and Industry Structure. Popular Communication 2 (4) : 231–255. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kroll, Jeri. 2004. The Resurrected Author: Creative Writers in 21st-century Higher Education. New Writing 1 (2) : 89–102. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Tiersma, Peter and Lawrence M. Solan. 2004. Author Identification in American Courts. Applied Linguistics 25 (4) : 448–465. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Johnson, Susan, Patricia Linton and Robert Madigan. 1994. The role of internal standards in assessment of written discourse. Discourse Processes 18 (2) : 231–245. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Mey, Jacob L. 1994. Edifying Archie or: How to Fool the Reader. In Parret, Herman, ed. Pretending to Communicate. (Foundations of communication and cognition). Walter de Gruyter. pp. 154–172. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Duranti, Alessandro. 1993. Beyond Bakhtin or the dialogic imagination in academia. Pragmatics 3 (3) : 333–340. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)