Publications

Found 25 recordsSort by Active filters:
Gries, Stefan Th. and Tobias Bernaisch. 2016. Exploring epicentres empirically. Focus on South Asian Englishes. English World-Wide 17 (1) : 1–25.
Smith, David A., Judith N. Biesen and Deborah E. Schooler. 2016. What a Difference a Pronoun Makes. I/We Versus You/Me and Worried Couples’ Perceptions of Their Interaction Quality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 35 (2) : 180–205.
Carta, Caterina. 2015. The swinging “we”. Framing the European Union international discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 14 (1) : 65–85.
Izutsu, Katsunobu and Mitsuko Narita Izutsu. 2012. Inclusivity and non-solidarity: Honorific pronominals in Ainu. Pragmatics and Society 3 (1) : 149–166.
Morgenstern, Aliyah. 2012. The self as other: Self words and pronominal reversals in language acquisition. In Lorda, Clara and Patrick Zabalbeascoa, eds. Spaces of Polyphony. (Dialogue Studies 15). John Benjamins. pp. 57–72.
Appiah Amfo, Nana Aba. 2010. Indefiniteness marking and Akan bi. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (7) : 1786–1798.
Cornish, Francis. 2007. Indirect pronominal anaphora in English and French: Marginal rarity, or unmarked norm? Some psycholinguistic evidence. In Schwarz-Friesel, Monika, Manfred Consten and Mareile Knees, eds. Anaphors in Text. Cognitive, formal and applied approaches to anaphoric reference. (Studies in Language Companion Series 86). John Benjamins. pp. 21–36.
Swain, Merrill, Sharon Lapkin and Monika Smith. 2002. Reformulation and the Learning of French Pronominal Verbs in a Canadian French Immersion Context. The Modern Language Journal 86 (4) : 485–507.
Jacquemet, Marco. 1994. T-offenses and metapragmatic attacks: strategies of interactional dominance. Discourse & Society 5 (3) : 297–319.
Lobeck, Anne. 1993. Strong agreement and identification: Evidence from ellipsis in English. Linguistics 31 (5) : 777–811.
Busemann, Stephan. 1984. Topicalization and pronominalization: Extending a natural language generation system.
MacWhinney, Brian. 1984. Grammatical devices for sharing points. In Schiefelbusch, Richard L. and Joanne Pickar, eds. The acquisition of communicative competence. University Park Press. pp. 323–374.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1979. Pronouns in discourse. In Givón, Talmy, ed. Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax. Academic Press. pp. 289–309.
Yule, George. 1979. Pragmatically controlled anaphora. Lingua 49 (2-3) : 127–135.
Bock, Michael and Johannes Engelkamp. 1978. Textstrukturen aus sprachpsychologischer Sicht. Folia Linguistica 12 (3-4) : 301–318.
Gundel, Jeanette Kohn. 1978. A universal constraint on deletion. Proceedings of the International Congress of Linguists/Actes du Congrès International des Linguistes 12 : 532–536.
Gundel, Jeanette Kohn. 1978. Stress, pronominalization and the given-new distinction. Working Papers in Linguistics 10 (2) : 1–13.
Hinds, John V. 1978. Anaphora in Japanese conversation. In Hinds, John V., ed. Anaphora in discourse. Linguistic Research. pp. 136–179.
MacWhinney, Brian and Elizabeth Bates. 1978. Sentential devices for conveying givenness and newness: A cross-cultural developmental study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17 (5) : 539–558.
Pléh, Csaba and Katalin Radics. 1978. Truncated sentence, pronominalization and the text. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 28 (1-2) : 91–113.
Braunmüller, Kurt. 1977. Referenz und Pronominalisierung: Zu den Deiktika und Proformen des Deutschen. M. Niemeyer.
Bily, Milan. 1976. 'Pronominalization rules' (coreference rules) described in terms of functional sentence perspective (FSP). Papers from the Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics 3 : 51–62.
Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Li, Charles N., ed. Subject and topic. Academic Press. pp. 149–188.
Bickerton, Derek. 1975. Some assertions about presuppositions about pronominalization. Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 11 (Parasession on functionalism) : 24–35.
Bickerton, Derek. 1975. Two levels of logical presupposition. Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 11 : 48–59.