Publications
Gao, Hua. 2019. Devices of alignment. Suoyi- and Danshi-prefaced questions in Mandarin Chinese TV news interviews. Chinese Language and Discourse 10 (1) : 36–60. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Gao, Hua. 2019. Devices of alignment. Suoyi- and Danshi-prefaced questions in Mandarin Chinese TV news interviews. Chinese Language and Discourse 10 (1). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
McArthur, Amanda. 2019. Pain and the collision of expertise in primary care physical exams. Discourse Studies 21 (5) : 522–539. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lehtinen, Esa and Piia Mikkola. 2019. Drawing conclusions about what co-participants know: Knowledge-probing question–answer sequences in new employee orientation lectures. Discourse & Communication 13 (5) : 516–538. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Schepen, Nynke van. 2019. Political transparency matters: Citizens challenging officials via ‘have you planned X’-type questions. Discourse & Society 30 (5) : 521–535. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Nadeu, Marianna and Frances Blanchette. 2018. Prosody and the meanings of English negative indefinites. Journal of Pragmatics 129 : 123–139. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Walker, Traci, Alison Channon and Paul Foulkes. 2018. ‘But what is the reason why you know such things?’: Question and response patterns in the LADO interview. Journal of Pragmatics 129 : 154–172. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Garcia, Angela Cora. 2018. Presidential campaign talk: Question-answering in ‘Neutral Informational Interviews’. Discourse & Society 29 (3) : 256–278. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Heritage, John. 2018. The ubiquity of epistemics: A rebuttal to the ‘epistemics of epistemics’ group. Discourse Studies 20 (1) : 14–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Matoesian, Gregory M. 2018. This is not a course in trial practice: Multimodal participation in objections. Journal of Pragmatics 129 : 199–219. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Varela Suárez, Ana. 2018. The question‐answer adjacency pair in dementia discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28 (1) : 86–101. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Ishino, Mika. 2017. Subversive questions for classroom turn-taking traffic management. Journal of Pragmatics 117 : 41–57. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Sierra, Sylvia. 2017. “Buffy sings to Cody”: A multimodal analysis of mother and pre-lingual-infant question–response sequences. Journal of Pragmatics 110 : 50–62. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Sugiura, Hideyuki. 2017. Expressing an alternative view from second position: Reversed polarity questions in everyday Japanese conversation. Discourse Studies 19 (3) : 291–313. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Alfahad, Abdulrahman. 2016. Equivocation in Arabic News Interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 35 (2) : 206–223. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bolden, Galina B. 2016. A simple da?: Affirming responses to polar questions in Russian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 100 : 40–45. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bangerter, Adrian, Eric Mayor and Julie Brosy. 2016. Disfluent Responses to Job Interview Questions and What They Entail. Discourse Processes 53 (5,6) : 371–391. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Clementson, David E. 2016. Why Do We Think Politicians Are So Evasive? Insight From Theories of Equivocation and Deception, With a Content Analysis of U.S. Presidential Debates, 1996-2012. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 35 (3) : 247–267. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)