Publications
Pecman, Mojca. 2012. Tentativeness in term formation: A study of neology as a rhetorical device in scientific papers. Terminology 18 (1) : 27–58.
Goldman, Susan R. and Jason L. G. Braasch. 2010. The Role of Prior Knowledge in Learning From Analogies in Science Texts. Discourse Processes 47 (6) : 447–449.
Nakao, Yukie, Lorraine Goeuriot and Béatrice Daille. 2010. Multilingual modalities for specialized languages. Terminology 16 (1) : 51–76.
Kim, Chul-Kyu and Geoff Thompson. 2010. Obligation and reader involvement in English and Korean science popularizations: a corpus-based cross-cultural text analysis. Text & Talk 30 (1) : 53–73.
Englander, Karen. 2009. Transformation of the Identities of Nonnative English-Speaking Scientists as a Consequence of the Social Construction of Revision. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 8 (1) : 35–53.
Stewart, Craig O. 2008. How a media controversy can influence a scientific publication: The case of Robert L. Spitzer’s “reparative therapy” study. In Johnstone, Barbara and Christopher Eisenhart, eds. Rhetoric in Detail. Discourse analyses of rhetorical talk and text. (Discourse approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 31). John Benjamins. pp. 255–278.
Coulmas, Florian. 2007. English monolingualism in scientific communication and progress in science, good or bad? AILA Review 20 : 5–13.
Flowerdew, John. 2007. The non-Anglophone scholar on the periphery of scholarly publication. AILA Review 20 : 14–27.
Hamel, Rainer Enrique. 2007. The dominance of English in the international scientific periodical literature and the future of language use in science. AILA Review 20 : 53–71.
Parijs, Philippe van. 2007. Tackling the Anglophones’ free ride: Fair linguistic cooperation with a global lingua franca. AILA Review 20 : 72–86.
Southwell, Brian and Alicia Torres. 2006. Connecting Interpersonal and Mass Communication: Science News Exposure, Perceived Ability to Understand Science, and Conversation. Communication Monographs 73 (3) : 334–350.
Fahkri, Ahmed. 2004. Rhetorical properties of Arabic research article introductions. Journal of Pragmatics 36 (6) : 1119–1138.
Haggan, Madeline. 2004. Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: dimensions of attraction. Journal of Pragmatics 36 (2) : 293–317.
Ciapuscio, Guiomar E. 2003. Formulation and reformulation procedures in verbal interactions between experts and (semi-)laypersons. Discourse Studies 5 (2) : 207–234.
Capozza, D., C. Volpato and R. Falvo. 2003. Scientific Communication and Stereotype Change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 33 (7) : 1501–²529.
Moirand, Sophie. 2003. Communicative and cognitive dimensions of discourse on science in the French mass media. Discourse Studies 5 (2) : 175–206.
Myers, Greg. 2003. Discourse studies of scientific popularization: questioning the boundaries. Discourse Studies 5 (2) : 265–279.
Wolf, Yuval and Joel Walters. 2001. Definite articles in the context of literacy and scientific writings. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (6) : 965–967.
Darian, Steven. 2000. The role of figurative language in introductory science texts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10 (2) : 163–186.
Jakobs, Eva-Maria. 1999. Textvernetzung in den Wissenschaften. Zitat und Verweis als Ergebnis rezeptiven, reproduktiven und produktiven Handelns. [Textual Networks in Scholarship and the Sciences. Citation and reference as the fruit of receptive, reproductive, and productive action.] (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 210). De Gruyter.
Atkinson, Dwight. 1996. The philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975. A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society : 333–371.