Publications

Found 64 recordsSort by Active filters:
Sanders, Ted, Gerdineke van Silfhout and Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul. 2015. Connectives as Processing Signals: How Students Benefit in Processing Narrative and Expository Texts. Discourse Processes 52 (1).
Molder, Hedwig F.M. te and Wyke Stommel. 2015. Counseling Online and Over the Phone: When Preclosing Questions Fail as a Closing Device. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (3) : 281–300.
Wallace, Derek. 2012. Bringing people with us: legislative writing as political rhetoric. Text & Talk 32 (1) : 83–101.
Mashal, N. and Miriam Faust. 2010. The Effects of Metaphoricity and Presentation Style on Brain Activation During Text Comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol 25 (1) : 19–33.
Albl-Mikasa, Michaela. 2008. (Non-)Sense in note-taking for consecutive interpreting. Interpreting 10 (2) : 197–231.
Broek, Paul van den and Yasmine L. Konheim-Kalkstein. 2008. The Effect of Incentives on Cognitive Processing of Text. Discourse Processes 45 (2) : 180–194.
Hannon, Brenda, Meredyth Daneman and Christine Burton. 2006. Are There Age-Related Differences in Shallow Semantic Processing of Text? Evidence From Eye Movements. Discourse Processes 42 (2) : 177–203.
Holland, Robert. 2006. Language(s) in the global news: Translation, audience design and discourse (mis)representation. Target 18 (2) : 229–259.
O'Brien, Edward J. and Richard Gerrig. 2005. The Scope of Memory-Based Processing. Discourse Processes 39 (2/3) : 225–242.
Long, Debra L. and R. Brooke Lea. 2005. Have We Been Searching for Meaning in All the Wrong Places? Defining the "Search After Meaning" Principle in Comprehension. Discourse Processes 39 (2/3) : 279–298.
Hannon, Brenda and Meredyth Daneman. 2004. Shallow Semantic Processing of Text: An Individual-Differences Account. Discourse Processes 37 (3) : 187–204.
Kapsalis, George. 2004. Discussion during text processing in Modern Greek Language. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature 4 (1) : 203–220.
Liddicoat, A.J. 2004. Grammar as a Feature of Text Construction: Time and Rhetorical Function in French Journal Articles in Biology. Written Communication 21 (4) : 316–343.
Sanders, Ted J.M. and Morton Ann Gernsbacher. 2004. Accessibility in Text and Discourse Processing. Discourse Processes 37 (2) : 79–89.
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann and Ted J.M. Sanders, eds. 2004. Accessibility in Text and Discourse Processing. A Special Issue of Discourse Processes. Routledge.
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, Paul van den Broek, Rachel R. W. Robertson, Tracy Linderholm, Lana Neninde and Brian Sundermier. 2004. Suppression of Story Character Goals During Reading. Discourse Processes 37 (1) : 67–78.
Obana, Yasuko. 2003. Anaphoric choices in Japanese fictional novels: The discourse arrangement of noun phrases, zero and third person pronouns. Text 23 (3) : 405–443.
Kaakinen, Johanna K., Jukka Hyönä and Janice M. Keenan. 2002. Perspective effects on online text processing. Discourse Processes 33 (2) : 159–173.
Dixon, Peter and Marisa Bortolussi. 2001. Text is Not Communication: A Challenge to a Common Assumption. Discourse Processes 31 (1) : 1–25.
Gerrig, Richard J. and William S. Horton. 2001. Of Texts and Toggles: Categorical Versus Continuous Views of Communication. Discourse Processes 32 (1) : 81–87.
Rouet, Jean-François, Eduardo Vidal-Abarca, Alain Bert Erboul and Victor Millogo. 2001. Effects of Information Search Tasks on the Comprehension of Instructional Text. Discourse Processes 31 (2) : 163–186.
Sanders, Ted J.M., Joost Schilperoord and Wilbert Spooren, eds. 2001. Text Representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. (Human Cognitive Processing 8). John Benjamins.
Horiba, Yukie. 2000. Reader Control In Reading: Effects of Language Competence, Text Type, and Task. Discourse Processes 29 (3) : 223–267.
Sanders, Ted J.M. and Leo G.M. Noordman. 2000. The Role of Coherence Relations and Their Linguistic Markers in Text Processing. Discourse Processes 29 (1) : 37–60.
Albrecht, Jason E. and Jerome L. Myers. 1998. Accessing Distant Text Information During Reading: Effects of Contextual Cues. Discourse Processes 26 (2) : 87–107.